Author Topic: AMD OpenCL Momentum miner  (Read 143839 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline crazycoin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #450 on: February 19, 2014, 06:31:37 pm »
Forget about my plea. I have used wrong command.

Offline unsoindovo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2014, 06:39:27 pm »
hi NaN!

we know difficult for protoshares is rised to 0.017247.
just a simple question.
When difficult rise, with same config, cpm go down?
or when difficult rise the cpm remain the same, but i get minus shares/hour?

thank you for the answer!

Offline luigi1111

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #452 on: February 19, 2014, 06:45:39 pm »
hi NaN!

we know difficult for protoshares is rised to 0.017247.
just a simple question.
When difficult rise, with same config, cpm go down?
or when difficult rise the cpm remain the same, but i get minus shares/hour?

thank you for the answer!

CPM will stay the same at all difficulties. Share difficulty is defined by the pool and will also stay the same. What will change is how hard it is to get a block.

Offline Alec246

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #453 on: February 20, 2014, 12:00:30 am »
Estimated difficulty: 0.02345569 and rising everyday. I guess in 5 days PTS will loose it's profitability with a single R9 280X :/ Those ridiculous 10X R9 290X Litecoin Rigs probably have figured this is the best coin right now.

Offline luigi1111

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #454 on: February 20, 2014, 12:07:03 am »
Estimated difficulty: 0.02345569 and rising everyday. I guess in 5 days PTS will loose it's profitability with a single R9 280X :/ Those ridiculous 10X R9 290X Litecoin Rigs probably have figured this is the best coin right now.

Heh, how about the guys with 100 290s? They're loving the 2+ BTC per day.

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #455 on: February 20, 2014, 12:13:49 am »
It's all for the best of PTS.. get the chain done... =)

Offline tengattack

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #456 on: February 20, 2014, 12:15:32 am »
but now the price of PTS also go rise :)

Offline marcolecorse

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #457 on: February 20, 2014, 12:32:05 am »
Hello

3 R9 290 Sapphire

collisions/min: 8486.8750 Shares total: 110
Share found! (Blockheight: 53586)

-a 1 -t 0.0,1,1,2,2

Good ???

Offline montecristo83

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #458 on: February 20, 2014, 01:55:51 am »
Hello

3 R9 290 Sapphire

collisions/min: 8486.8750 Shares total: 110
Share found! (Blockheight: 53586)

-a 1 -t 0.0,1,1,2,2

Good ???

With the latest version? No. I get more with 3x 280X. People in this thread have reported speeds of close to 4000 CPM for each card.

Read the last 10 pages and try the various settings and configurations they've posted. Also, in your commandline there is a . instead of , between 0 and 0. By the looks of it, most 290 users get better performance with -a 0 or -a 2.

Try this instead: -t 0,0,1,1,2,2     (try with AND without -a 1, -a 2 and -a 3)
« Last Edit: February 20, 2014, 01:57:29 am by montecristo83 »

Offline battleaxe

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #459 on: February 20, 2014, 03:01:25 am »
What Catalyst drivers are you guys using for Linux?

Offline luigi1111

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #460 on: February 20, 2014, 03:20:03 am »
Hello

3 R9 290 Sapphire

collisions/min: 8486.8750 Shares total: 110
Share found! (Blockheight: 53586)

-a 1 -t 0.0,1,1,2,2

Good ???

With the latest version? No. I get more with 3x 280X. People in this thread have reported speeds of close to 4000 CPM for each card.

Read the last 10 pages and try the various settings and configurations they've posted. Also, in your commandline there is a . instead of , between 0 and 0. By the looks of it, most 290 users get better performance with -a 0 or -a 2.

Try this instead: -t 0,0,1,1,2,2     (try with AND without -a 1, -a 2 and -a 3)

If on Windows, you'll probably get around what he's getting.

Offline maddi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #461 on: February 20, 2014, 03:48:04 am »
can anyone please help me to set up? i want to start pts mining using x3 sapphire r9 280x dual . i downloaded clpts-v0.1.4_win_x86 ... what config do i need to use? how can i know if my gpu is working? and can i run 3 bat file ? or only 1 bat file will do? please help me..im confused!

Offline NaN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #462 on: February 20, 2014, 03:50:55 am »
Please read the README. But I guess that one .bat file with clpts_x86 <your-address> -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1 will do the job.

Offline visterln

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #463 on: February 20, 2014, 04:41:21 am »
Please read the README. But I guess that one .bat file with clpts_x86 <your-address> -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1 will do the job.

Recently, in the further optimization of it? AMD graphics cards has increased dramatically speed also can do?

Offline marcolecorse

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #464 on: February 20, 2014, 06:50:53 am »
Hello

3 R9 290 Sapphire

collisions/min: 8486.8750 Shares total: 110
Share found! (Blockheight: 53586)

-a 1 -t 0.0,1,1,2,2

Good ???

With the latest version? No. I get more with 3x 280X. People in this thread have reported speeds of close to 4000 CPM for each card.

Read the last 10 pages and try the various settings and configurations they've posted. Also, in your commandline there is a . instead of , between 0 and 0. By the looks of it, most 290 users get better performance with -a 0 or -a 2.

Try this instead: -t 0,0,1,1,2,2     (try with AND without -a 1, -a 2 and -a 3)

Hello Thx reply

Yes Windows 7 64 bits , Drivers 13.12