Author Topic: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model  (Read 3381 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline blockchained

Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2020, 01:11:53 pm »
blockchained mistakenly wrote alt instead of abit.
Yes, I was mistaken

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1895
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2020, 05:45:30 am »
Mark ATM:

1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model                483,504,455
1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                              483,019,167
1.14.261   Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model     136,235,999

Offline blockchained

Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2020, 04:36:10 pm »
Mark ATM:

1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model                483,504,455
1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                              483,019,167
1.14.261   Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model     136,235,999

bitCNY, [01.06.20 10:17] in telegram
What is the purpose on a threshold on bitshares if you just lower the threshold when wanting to get something getting voted in.
It makes the threshold irrelevant and doubling the votes from proxies who want to get a BAIP voted in.


bitCNY, [01.06.20 10:17] in telegram
That voting system makes no sense as it doesn't have a real threshold it is basicly desinged in favour of big proxies


that's why we need to reconsider this system at least count negative vote when we look for threshold

for example

VOTE.YES - VOTE.NO = X
if X less than threshold baip/bsip didn't pas 

somehow even if we have a negative vote but we count only positive ones
« Last Edit: June 01, 2020, 04:45:58 pm by blockchained »

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2020, 09:08:50 pm »
Mark ATM:

1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                                489,243,582
1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model                488,422,933

Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1895
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2020, 10:40:34 am »
Mark ATM:

1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model               488,278,404
1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                               488,269,458

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2020, 02:17:51 pm »
Mark ATM:


1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                               488,436,685
1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model               488,273,693


Offline bitcrab

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1895
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcrab
  • GitHub: bitcrab
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #21 on: June 03, 2020, 01:07:15 pm »
Mark ATM:

1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model.               488,629,650   
1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                                485,310,353
1.14.261   Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model.    140,189,259

Offline binggo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #22 on: June 03, 2020, 01:30:42 pm »
Mark ATM:

1.14.260   Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model.               488,629,650   
1.14.236   BAIP-Threshold                                                                485,310,353
1.14.261   Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model.    140,189,259

hongcaibao111

so, this is the your and cn-vote's little trick?

Why cn-vote didn't remove the vote from the BAIP-Threshold directly?

So rediculous mechanism of this BAIP-Threshold!

这就是你们的小伎俩?!

那cn-vote直接把票从BAIP-Threshold不更好吗?!

傻逼一样的BAIP-Threshold投票机制巨蟹你还在玩的很开心是吧?

何必这样既要当婊子又要立牌坊呢?像个爷们一样的做事情不好吗?!

早就料到你们会出这种下三滥的手段,果真不出所料,品行一致!


几个BTS的理事,做出这种投票Threshold机制,脸上害不害臊?理事还偷偷的玩这种伎俩,丢人不丢人? 

bts社区脏成这样,也算是开眼了!


« Last Edit: June 03, 2020, 02:08:41 pm by binggo »

Offline btstodamoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #23 on: June 03, 2020, 03:04:05 pm »
🦐bb什么?不是投票了吗?你不服,买币投票啊?把票干下去,巨蟹在群里拉了2天票,你在干嘛?投不上去你bb,投上去了,你还bb。

Offline binggo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #24 on: June 03, 2020, 03:22:28 pm »
🦐bb什么?不是投票了吗?你不服,买币投票啊?把票干下去,巨蟹在群里拉了2天票,你在干嘛?投不上去你bb,投上去了,你还bb。

不懂就少说话。

做事情别天天既想当婊子又想立牌坊。

这些钱花不花对我来说无所谓,但是我就是看不惯这种脏!
« Last Edit: June 03, 2020, 03:26:31 pm by binggo »

Offline btstodamoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #25 on: June 03, 2020, 03:26:42 pm »
我还就真不懂,我就知道dpos是钱说了算,你觉得不公平,买币投下去,我叫你爸爸

Offline binggo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #26 on: June 03, 2020, 03:28:17 pm »
我还就真不懂,我就知道dpos是钱说了算,你觉得不公平,买币投下去,我叫你爸爸

所以说你不懂就少说话。

Offline btstodamoon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #27 on: June 03, 2020, 03:32:38 pm »
有本事3天内买币投下去

Offline binggo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #28 on: June 03, 2020, 03:34:15 pm »
有本事3天内买币投下去

不懂别说话,没人当你哑巴!

Offline Thul3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
Re: [Poll] BAIP6: BTS-DEX economic model
« Reply #29 on: June 03, 2020, 08:43:29 pm »
BAIP threshold can't be considered any significant with all the manipulations happening.There is no threshold at all.

CN-Vote not removing their vote for BAIP threshold directly as it would put the threshold on 200 million votes which would clearly show bitassets are a clear joke now in the hands of a single entity.

I just waited to see that happening to show how they destroyed any valid voting system and trust into bitassets
You are just destroying more and more confidence into bitassets.

@Abit you support it ?

You keeping destroying bitassets confidence this way ?
Funny you claim in telegram something else but support these kind of cheats.
You really belive the MM will bring bitshares more benefit than the damage you are creating with endless cheating to bitassets ?
Who is going to hold bitassets with such a BAIP threshold joke

« Last Edit: June 03, 2020, 09:34:55 pm by Thul3 »