Author Topic: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted  (Read 12703 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline king

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2014, 06:35:20 pm »

{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "1a1810e494b7216dbe504e4de536cd70f860376b",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "18 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "47 hours ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 31 2014 at 02:27:59"
}

--- there are now 13 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 14 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 13 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 14 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 13 active connections to the p2p network

Maintain 10+ connections, runs well
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 06:39:01 pm by king »
BTSX Account: mister
BTSX Delegate :sun.delegate.service,moon.delegate.service

Offline sfinder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
  • 4 Cores CPU+100GB SSD+anti-DDoS Pro
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #31 on: August 30, 2014, 06:47:30 pm »

delegate id:  help.chinese

17 connections

Quote
info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 357191,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "5 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-30T18:46:20",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "99.02 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "291,141.94140 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "2.40692 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,925,911.52970 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 46,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 8 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-30T18:54:00",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "1b024eeae18c9573cb263c6a7b067a74d7ffcd91",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/daniel/.BitSharesX",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 17,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-30T18:46:25",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.003166,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "3 years 2 months in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "2017-10-31T04:25:26",
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": "2014-08-30T18:24:30",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "? %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
微博:星在飘我在找|BTS X 受托人delegate ID:baidu
中国教育书店合作将20%收入捐献给贫困山区学生。
Cooperating with China Education Bookstore and will donate 20% of delegate income to the poor students

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #32 on: August 30, 2014, 06:49:19 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup. 

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2014, 06:52:05 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup.
Have you issued a rescan?

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2014, 06:53:32 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup.
Have you issued a rescan?

Code: [Select]
wallet_recover_accounts <accounts_to_recover> [maximum_number_of_attempts]                         
wallet_recover_transaction <transaction_id_prefix> [recipient_account]
 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2014, 06:57:37 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup.
Have you issued a rescan?

First thing I tried after fully syncing.

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #36 on: August 30, 2014, 07:03:11 pm »
Code: [Select]
--- there are now 51 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>>
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x000000000065f160 in exception_impl (
    this=0x333f2780)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:28
#2  fc::exception::exception (this=0x35f660e0, c=...)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:98
#3  0x000000000074ff35 in bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to_task (this=0x236dcb0, new_peer=...,
    remote_endpoint=...)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:3167
#4  0x0000000000750036 in operator() (
    __closure=<optimized out>)                       -
09  at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:34---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#5  fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to(const fc::ip::endpoint&)::__lambda19>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>,
    prom=0x2dd63b10)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:83
#6  0x00000000006725a3 in fc::task_base::run_impl (
    [email protected]=0x2dd63b38)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:43
#7  0x0000000000672c55 in fc::task_base::run (
    [email protected]=0x2dd63b38)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:32
#8  0x0000000000670cdb in run_next_task (
    this=0x1848690)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/-
#9  fc::thread_d::process_tasks (q <return> to quit---
    [email protected]=0x1848690)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:422
#10 0x0000000000670f66 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25462416)
    at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:378
#11 0x0000000000d58d4e in make_fcontext ()
#12 0x0000000001848690 in ?? ()
#13 0x00007fffc586ec60 in ?? ()
#14 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
p2p log
Code: [Select]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rpzoi37iqshget6/p2p.log.20140830T180000?dl=0
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #37 on: August 30, 2014, 07:03:39 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup.
Have you issued a rescan?

Code: [Select]
wallet_recover_accounts <accounts_to_recover> [maximum_number_of_attempts]                         
wallet_recover_transaction <transaction_id_prefix> [recipient_account]


Ran those after the rescan, neither seemed to do anything (unless I am using them incorrectly).

I only have one registered account and placed 3 orders in the BitUSD market so what would be the correct values for accounts_to_recover and max attempts?

When I run wallet_recover_transaction on all the transactions that I can see, I get this output:

Code: [Select]
wallet_recover_transaction 289de77a ionx

10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
has_deposit:
    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3018 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3099 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:1667 wallet_recover_transaction

    {"command":"wallet_recover_transaction"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:481 execute_command

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #38 on: August 30, 2014, 07:07:13 pm »
Sycned and scanned for transactions OK.

Most transactions show up, recipient is shown as "UNKNOWN" for BitUSD orders.

Missing BitUSD balance (shows zero). Also missing BTSX from an ask order.

Wallet was restored from JSON backup.
Have you issued a rescan?

Code: [Select]
wallet_recover_accounts <accounts_to_recover> [maximum_number_of_attempts]                         
wallet_recover_transaction <transaction_id_prefix> [recipient_account]


Ran those after the rescan, neither seemed to do anything (unless I am using them incorrectly).

I only have one registered account and placed 3 orders in the BitUSD market so what would be the correct values for accounts_to_recover and max attempts?

When I run wallet_recover_transaction on all the transactions that I can see, I get this output:

Code: [Select]
wallet_recover_transaction 289de77a ionx

10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
has_deposit:
    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3018 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3099 recover_transaction

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:1667 wallet_recover_transaction

    {"command":"wallet_recover_transaction"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:481 execute_command

It looks like the recover transaction only works for transfers and not bids/asks.   I am looking to add something to recover bids/asks. 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #39 on: August 30, 2014, 08:35:02 pm »
Just got home. Do you still need someone to test this?
I've seen an announcement from DACSUNlimited stating they are going to release soon.

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #40 on: August 30, 2014, 08:38:39 pm »
Just got home. Do you still need someone to test this?
I've seen an announcement from DACSUNlimited stating they are going to release soon.

Any testing prior to their release is good. 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline ripplexiaoshan

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2299
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: jademont
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #41 on: August 30, 2014, 09:11:44 pm »
Just got home. Do you still need someone to test this?
I've seen an announcement from DACSUNlimited stating they are going to release soon.

Any testing prior to their release is good.

Thanks for the high efficiency. +5%   
I updated the linux version, everything seems fine as always, but usually WIN version is more buggy. Do you consider testing WIN version in future before official release?
BTS committee member:jademont

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #42 on: August 30, 2014, 09:15:36 pm »
--- there are now 14 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)

This is on my first attempt.
UPDATE:
This happened while synchronizating
28M Aug 31 00:12 default.log

After restart this was the console:
Code: [Select]
--- there are now 5 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 6 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 253175,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "13 days old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-18T07:44:50",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "0.09 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 2,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "128,843.25205 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.06517 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,952,698.70823 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 32,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 5 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-30T21:24:00",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "8ec22d46a6e4647264f29983bafa529d391080e9",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 6,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-30T21:18:49",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.0021410000000000001,
  "wallet_open": false,
  "wallet_unlocked": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_scan_progress": null,
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}

It was synchronizing with about 1000 blocks/sec. And I increased desired_connections to 40 minute before the crash.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 09:21:02 pm by emski »

Offline bytemaster

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #43 on: August 30, 2014, 09:20:35 pm »
--- there are now 14 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)

This is on my first attempt.
UPDATE:
This happened while synchronizating
28M Aug 31 00:12 default.log

After restart this was the console:
Code: [Select]
--- there are now 5 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 6 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 253175,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "13 days old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-18T07:44:50",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "0.09 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 2,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "128,843.25205 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.06517 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,952,698.70823 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 32,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 5 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-30T21:24:00",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "8ec22d46a6e4647264f29983bafa529d391080e9",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 6,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-30T21:18:49",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.0021410000000000001,
  "wallet_open": false,
  "wallet_unlocked": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_scan_progress": null,
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}

Stack trace?   
Make sure to pull the latest master we have fixed a few crash issues we discovered while testing.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline bitcoinerS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #44 on: August 30, 2014, 09:25:19 pm »
Code: [Select]
default (unlocked) >>> about
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "1a1810e494b7216dbe504e4de536cd70f860376b",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "21 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "50 hours ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 30 2014 at 20:06:36"
}

Code: [Select]
>>> get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 358126,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "5 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-30T21:24:40",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "97.12 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "289,266.37678 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "2.39142 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,925,610.19498 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 20,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 3 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-30T21:28:00",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "bbdbf0ca55a7bebfbd24da4bebce58f0c80c3f68",
  "client_data_dir": "/root/.BitSharesX",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 7,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-30T21:24:45",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.019466000000000001,
  "wallet_open": false,
  "wallet_unlocked": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": null,
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_scan_progress": null,
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null


Code: [Select]
--- there are now 15 active connections to the p2p network
default (unlocked) >>>
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x000000000065f160 in exception_impl (this=0x16b97ca0) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:28
#2  fc::exception::exception (this=0x3310abc0, c=...) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:98
#3  0x000000000074ff35 in bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to_task (this=0x2343370, new_peer=..., remote_endpoint=...) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:3167
#4  0x0000000000750036 in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:3409
#5  fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to(const fc::ip::endpoint&)::__lambda19>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0x33931740) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:83
#6  0x00000000006725a3 in fc::task_base::run_impl ([email protected]=0x33931768) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:43
#7  0x0000000000672c55 in fc::task_base::run ([email protected]=0x33931768) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:32
#8  0x0000000000670cdb in run_next_task (this=0x1848690) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:398
#9  fc::thread_d::process_tasks ([email protected]=0x1848690) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:422
#10 0x0000000000670f66 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25462416) at /root/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:378
#11 0x0000000000d58d4e in make_fcontext ()
#12 0x0000000001848690 in ?? ()
#13 0x00007fffcfb55c60 in ?? ()
#14 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
« Last Edit: August 30, 2014, 09:27:55 pm by bitcoinerS »
>>> approve bitcoiners