Author Topic: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted  (Read 9703 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #60 on: August 30, 2014, 10:38:47 pm »
It didnt crash with 40/40 on first attempt but when it synchronized it lost a lot of connections:

Code: [Select]
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 22 active connections to the p2p network
--- syncing with p2p network, our last block is 36 hours old
--- currently syncing at 685 blocks/sec, 18 seconds remaining
--- there are now 3 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 4 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 5 active connections to the p2p network
--- syncing with p2p network, our last block is 28 hours old
--- currently syncing at 533 blocks/sec, 18 seconds remaining
--- there are now 6 active connections to the p2p network
--- syncing with p2p network, our last block is 11 hours old
--- currently syncing at 406 blocks/sec, 9 seconds remaining
--- there are now 7 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 6 active connections to the p2p network

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #61 on: August 30, 2014, 10:47:23 pm »
2nd attempt

network_set_advanced_node_parameters { "maximum_number_of_connections": 40 }
network_set_advanced_node_parameters {  "desired_number_of_connections": 40 }

Code: [Select]
--- there are now 26 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 27 active connections to the p2p network
--- there are now 26 active connections to the p2p network
(wallet closed) >>>
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x00007ffff6f5c5c8 in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x000000000065f4e0 in exception_impl (this=0x21742930) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:28
#2  fc::exception::exception (this=0x1f5326f0, c=...) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:98
#3  0x0000000000750225 in bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to_task (this=0x1e20f50, new_peer=..., remote_endpoint=...) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:3167
#4  0x0000000000750326 in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:3409
#5  fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::detail::node_impl::connect_to(const fc::ip::endpoint&)::__lambda19>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0x154ff890)
    at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:83
#6  0x0000000000672923 in fc::task_base::run_impl ([email protected]=0x154ff8b8) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:43
#7  0x0000000000672fd5 in fc::task_base::run ([email protected]=0x154ff8b8) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:32
#8  0x000000000067105b in run_next_task (this=0x184c690) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:398
#9  fc::thread_d::process_tasks ([email protected]=0x184c690) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:422
#10 0x00000000006712e6 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25478800) at /home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:378
#11 0x0000000000d5c3fe in make_fcontext ()
#12 0x000000000184c690 in ?? ()
#13 0x00007fffc8d78c60 in ?? ()
#14 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Need these p2p too ?

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #62 on: August 30, 2014, 11:21:19 pm »
Its 2:00 (AM) here, so I'll be testing my pillow for the next 6-8 hours.

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #63 on: August 30, 2014, 11:49:06 pm »
Looking good!

wallet_regenerate_keys got my balances back to where they should be.

This is reassuring and proves the keys for all transactions are deterministic as claimed (I'm using an old backup).

Offline crazybit

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #64 on: August 30, 2014, 11:56:08 pm »
DAC Sun,

Suppose most of the delegates do not use the binary of the new version your provided but use git to pull the change,so please provide the following infor after you announce the new version, such that the delegates could confirm they have upgraded to the correct version.

btw,my delegates node have been upgrade to 0.4.10


crazybit (unlocked) >>> about
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "1ed1a6b07153e3ce5916be46f859302a1b50a4b0",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "2 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "53 hours ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 31 2014 at 08:12:26"
}
« Last Edit: August 31, 2014, 12:23:19 am by crazybit »

Offline Method-X

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
  • VIRAL
    • View Profile
    • Learn to code
  • BitShares: methodx
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #65 on: August 31, 2014, 01:10:20 am »
My balance is showing 0.00 in version 0.4.10

Offline JA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 650
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #66 on: August 31, 2014, 01:17:22 am »
 My Windows Client is working fine  :)

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #67 on: August 31, 2014, 01:40:05 am »
Just noticed that the transfer page is blank (white background, no fields/buttons).

And transfer from console gives this result:


Code: [Select]
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
oacct.valid(): expecting an account to existing at this point
    {}
    bitshares  wallet_db.cpp:381 store_key

    {"real_amount_to_transfer":removed,"amount_to_transfer_symbol":"removed","paying_account_name":"removed","from_account_name":"removed","to_account_name":"removed","memo_message":"removed"}
    bitshares  wallet.cpp:3664 transfer_asset

    {}
    bitshares  common_api_client.cpp:1027 wallet_transfer_from

    {"command":"wallet_transfer_from"}
    bitshares  cli.cpp:481 execute_command

Offline cass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4311
  • /(┬.┬)\
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #68 on: August 31, 2014, 01:45:25 am »
My 0.4.10 client doesn't sync. / osx 10.5.8

edit: restarted client, works now.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2014, 01:50:43 am by cass »
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #69 on: August 31, 2014, 01:46:15 am »
Windows and Linux GUI's working fine here.

Offline bitmeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #70 on: August 31, 2014, 01:46:28 am »


Now wallet import works, however:

Did this wallet lose all of the 75K BTSX here? Is that 50K sent to UNKNOWN what went to margin call, or supposed to be returned?

Offline yiminh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #71 on: August 31, 2014, 01:51:45 am »
0.4.10 exe still have a lot of UNKNOWNs with messed up balance, I'm start to think the programmers are incompetent

Offline bitmeat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #72 on: August 31, 2014, 02:00:17 am »
0.4.10 exe still have a lot of UNKNOWNs with messed up balance, I'm start to think the programmers are incompetent

Actually it's the cost of privacy - if you lose the transaction details, you can't recover them, but the balance should be safe.

So, backup your wallet often if you care about transaction details.

Also, if you don't like risk, wait until all the bugs are sorted out. You think Bitcoin was stable when it was $0.10?

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #73 on: August 31, 2014, 02:02:06 am »
0.4.10 exe still have a lot of UNKNOWNs with messed up balance, I'm start to think the programmers are incompetent


It's a complicated piece of software that's been out for a few weeks. The bugs are being worked out. We're not even on a 1.0 release yet.


I'm not sure about incompetent but they seem to be able to go days and days without sleep  :o
« Last Edit: August 31, 2014, 02:03:49 am by Riverhead »

Offline gamey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #74 on: August 31, 2014, 02:04:15 am »
I compiled a Windows version and while reindexing the blockchain it says this Assertion failed: _valid, file C:\bitshares\bitsharesx\libraries\fc\include\fc/optional.hpp 197

msvcr120d.dll!_NMSG_WRITE(int rterrnum) Line 226   C
    msvcr120d.dll!abort() Line 62   C
    msvcr120d.dll!_wassert(const wchar_t * expr, const wchar_t * filename, unsigned int lineno) Line 156   C
    bitshares_client.exe!fc::optional<bts::blockchain::market_order>::operator->() Line 197   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::market_engine::execute(fc::signed_int quote_id, fc::signed_int base_id, const fc::time_point_sec & timestamp) Line 154   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::execute_markets(const fc::time_point_sec & timestamp, const std::shared_ptr<bts::blockchain::pending_chain_state> & pending_state) Line 786   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::extend_chain(const bts::blockchain::full_block & block_data) Line 847   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::switch_to_fork(const fc::ripemd160 & block_id) Line 532   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::chain_database::push_block(const bts::blockchain::full_block & block_data) Line 1366   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::chain_database::open(const fc::path & data_dir, fc::optional<fc::path> genesis_file, std::function<void __cdecl(unsigned int)> reindex_status_callback) Line 1070   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::client::client::open(const fc::path & data_dir, fc::optional<fc::path> genesis_file_path, std::function<void __cdecl(unsigned int)> reindex_status_callback) Line 1640   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::client::client::configure_from_command_line(int argc, char * * argv) Line 2412   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!main(int argc, char * * argv) Line 32   C++
I speak for myself and only myself.