Author Topic: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted  (Read 12254 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #75 on: August 31, 2014, 02:04:53 am »

Did this wallet lose all of the 75K BTSX here? Is that 50K sent to UNKNOWN what went to margin call, or supposed to be returned?


Think you slipped a decimal on that 2.5k  ;)

Offline yiminh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #76 on: August 31, 2014, 02:12:18 am »
take a wild guess, I think the programmer did not commit enough or commited the wrong detail of the transactions and short positions to the blockchain, now they have no way to reconstruct the wallet with just a private key, we will have to manually print out transactions to get our balance right and our money back:( I'll send 3i my transactions, hopefully they will sent my missing balance back.

Offline HackFisher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 883
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #77 on: August 31, 2014, 02:24:40 am »
Maybe you can try in Release mode.
I compiled a Windows version and while reindexing the blockchain it says this Assertion failed: _valid, file C:\bitshares\bitsharesx\libraries\fc\include\fc/optional.hpp 197

msvcr120d.dll!_NMSG_WRITE(int rterrnum) Line 226   C
    msvcr120d.dll!abort() Line 62   C
    msvcr120d.dll!_wassert(const wchar_t * expr, const wchar_t * filename, unsigned int lineno) Line 156   C
    bitshares_client.exe!fc::optional<bts::blockchain::market_order>::operator->() Line 197   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::market_engine::execute(fc::signed_int quote_id, fc::signed_int base_id, const fc::time_point_sec & timestamp) Line 154   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::execute_markets(const fc::time_point_sec & timestamp, const std::shared_ptr<bts::blockchain::pending_chain_state> & pending_state) Line 786   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::extend_chain(const bts::blockchain::full_block & block_data) Line 847   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::detail::chain_database_impl::switch_to_fork(const fc::ripemd160 & block_id) Line 532   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::chain_database::push_block(const bts::blockchain::full_block & block_data) Line 1366   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::blockchain::chain_database::open(const fc::path & data_dir, fc::optional<fc::path> genesis_file, std::function<void __cdecl(unsigned int)> reindex_status_callback) Line 1070   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::client::client::open(const fc::path & data_dir, fc::optional<fc::path> genesis_file_path, std::function<void __cdecl(unsigned int)> reindex_status_callback) Line 1640   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!bts::client::client::configure_from_command_line(int argc, char * * argv) Line 2412   C++
    bitshares_client.exe!main(int argc, char * * argv) Line 32   C++
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline ionx

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #78 on: August 31, 2014, 02:29:15 am »
For the devs:

Code: [Select]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
Core was generated by `./BitSharesX'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x00007f84cce730db in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007f84cce730db in std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string(std::string const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0x0000000000a74ac4 in operator()<std::basic_string<char>&> (
    var=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0x7f8473e8>,
    key="", this=0x7f8423afb200)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant_object.hpp:176
#2  fc::log_context::to_variant ([email protected]=0x7f84740607e0)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/log/log_message.cpp:167
#3  0x0000000000a759b3 in fc::to_variant (l=..., v=...)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/log/log_message.cpp:94
#4  0x0000000000a75b99 in variant<fc::log_context> (val=...,
    this=0x7f8423afb440)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant.hpp:421
#5  mutable_variant_object<fc::log_context&> (val=...,
    key="(\353\342t\204\177\000\000\224!\242\000\000\000\000\000\340y\212t\204\177\000\000 xDt\204\177\000\000\210\263\204t\204\177\000\000 +\315t\204\177\000\000X\320Wt\204\177\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\000 xDt\204\177\000\000#\350\242\000\000\000\000\000Д\340t\204\177\000\000\300\264\257#\204\177", '\000' <repeats 18 times>, "\200\265\257#\204\177\000\000 xDt\204\177\000\000\200\265\257#\204\177\000\000 \000\000t\204\177\000\000\020\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\360\265\257#\204\177\000\000д\257#\204\177\000\000\070Ret\204\177\000\000\360\265\257#\204\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\[email protected] {t\204\177\000\000"...,
    this=0x7f8423afb3f0)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant_object.hpp:197
#6  fc::log_message::to_variant (this=<optimized out>)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/log/log_message.cpp:201
#7  0x0000000000a762b3 in fc::to_variant (m=..., v=...)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/log/log_message.cpp:108
#8  0x0000000000a2b514 in variant<fc::log_message> (val=...,
    this=0x7f8423afb4d0)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant.hpp:421
Python Exception <type 'exceptions.TypeError'> instance has no next() method:
#9  fc::to_variant<fc::log_message> (t=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1,
    v=...) at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant.hpp:394
Python Exception <type 'exceptions.TypeError'> instance has no next() method:
#10 0x0000000000a27f2c in variant<std::vector<fc::log_message> > (
    val=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1, this=0x7f8423afb5f0)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant.hpp:421
Python Exception <type 'exceptions.TypeError'> instance has no next() method:
#11 operator()<const std::vector<fc::log_message>&> (
    var=std::vector of length 1, capacity 1,
    key="\350lCt\204\177\000\000 \000\000t\204\177\000\000\032\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\237\266\257#\204\177\000\000\220\224Jt\204\177\000\000\030i\000T\204\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\260\361V̄\177", '\000' <repeats 18 times>, "X!\247\001\000\000\000\000 \000\000t\204\177\000\000 \271\257#\204\177\000\000\060\271\257#\204\177\000\000`\303Nt\204\177\000\000\033\257h\000\000\000\000\000x\t\000t\204\177\000\000\260\361V̄\177\000\000\237\266\257#\204\177\000\000\030", '\000' <repeats 23 times>, " \271\257#\204\177\000\000\060\271\257#\204\177\000\000\360\270\257#\204\177\000\000"..., this=0x7f8423afb580)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant_object.hpp:176
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#12 fc::to_variant (e=..., v=...)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/exception.cpp:114
#13 0x000000000068af1b in variant<fc::exception> (val=..., this=0x7f8423afb650)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant.hpp:421
#14 fc::mutable_variant_object::operator()<fc::exception const&> (
    this=0x7f8423afb920, key="e", var=...)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/variant_object.hpp:176
#15 0x0000000000b9e56a in bts::net::peer_connection::destroy (
    [email protected]=0x7f8474e094d0)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:105
#16 0x0000000000b9f80b in bts::net::peer_connection::~peer_connection (
    [email protected]=0x7f8474e094d0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:116
#17 0x0000000000ba5661 in ~peer_connection (this=0x7f8474e094d0,
    __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:117
#18 std::_Sp_counted_ptr<bts::net::peer_connection*, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose (this=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:373
#19 0x0000000000b4b62a in _M_release (this=0x7f8474e28830)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:149
#20 ~__shared_count (this=0x7f84748d73c8, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:666
#21 ~__shared_ptr (this=0x7f84748d73c0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:914
#22 ~shared_ptr (this=0x7f84748d73c0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/shared_ptr.h:93
#23 ~_List_node (this=0x7f84748d73b0, __in_chrg=<optimized out>)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_list.h:106
#24 destroy<std::_List_node<std::shared_ptr<bts::net::peer_connection> > > (
    this=<optimized out>, __p=0x7f84748d73b0)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/ext/new_allocator.h:124
#25 std::_List_base<std::shared_ptr<bts::net::peer_connection>, std::allocator<std::shared_ptr<bts::net::peer_connection> > >::_M_clear (
    [email protected]=0x7f84744160d8) at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/list.tcc:75
#26 0x0000000000b063f8 in clear (this=0x7f84744160d8)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_list.h:1304
#27 bts::net::detail::node_impl::delayed_peer_deletion_task (
    this=0x7f8474415ca0) at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:1319
#28 0x0000000000b068dc in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/net/node.cpp:1355
#29 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::detail::node_impl::schedule_peer_for_deletion(const peer_connection_ptr&)::<lambda()> >::run(void *, void *) (
    functor=<optimized out>, prom=0x7f8474a74e70)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:83
#30 0x0000000000a36675 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=0x7f8474a74e80)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:43
#31 0x0000000000a35113 in run_next_task (this=<optimized out>)
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:398
#32 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=0x7f84740008c0)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:422
#33 0x0000000000a35381 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (
    my=140206858569920)
    at /home/deleted/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:378
#34 0x0000000000db20fe in make_fcontext ()
#35 0x00007f84740008c0 in ?? ()
#36 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Offline yiminh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #79 on: August 31, 2014, 02:34:43 am »
I think the balance fix will take at least two weeks, if ever.

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #80 on: August 31, 2014, 02:37:25 am »
I think the balance fix will take at least two weeks, if ever.


On what is this time estimate based? Hopefully it won't be that long. It's really the only serious glitch left.

Offline Method-X

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
  • VIRAL
    • View Profile
    • Learn to code
  • BitShares: methodx
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #81 on: August 31, 2014, 02:49:11 am »
I think the balance fix will take at least two weeks, if ever.

My balance is now showing as 0.00 -- I have a JSON backup. Am I ok? Did I just lose all of my investment?

Offline yiminh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #82 on: August 31, 2014, 02:50:57 am »
I think the balance fix will take at least two weeks, if ever.


On what is this time estimate based? Hopefully it won't be that long. It's really the only serious glitch left.

because I think they messed up the blochchian somehow

Offline Empirical1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 884
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #83 on: August 31, 2014, 02:53:35 am »
I think the balance fix will take at least two weeks, if ever.

My balance is now showing as 0.00 -- I have a JSON backup. Am I ok? Did I just lose all of my investment?

your funds are safe because your private keys are safe and eventually all bugs will be worked out.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7823.0

Offline yiminh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #84 on: August 31, 2014, 02:54:13 am »
0.4.10 is no worse nor better than 0.4.9, waiting for 0.5.0 hehe

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #85 on: August 31, 2014, 02:56:05 am »
My balance is now showing as 0.00 -- I have a JSON backup. Am I ok? Did I just lose all of my investment?


Have you done wallet_backup_restore <.json file> <wallet_name> ?

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #86 on: August 31, 2014, 03:02:50 am »

Successfully installed 0.4.10 on win 7/32bit with single account registered today. (Already huge improvement over 0.4.9/a - this was never achieved on my system through the GUI on 0.4.9(a)).

Trying Ubuntu now (yes, 0.4.9/a  the GUI mainly was crashing on it too, granted not so severely).
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline cryptkeeper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #87 on: August 31, 2014, 03:04:07 am »
installment was a success no crashes at all on my end.

Offline Method-X

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
  • VIRAL
    • View Profile
    • Learn to code
  • BitShares: methodx
Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #88 on: August 31, 2014, 03:04:22 am »
My balance is now showing as 0.00 -- I have a JSON backup. Am I ok? Did I just lose all of my investment?


Have you done wallet_backup_restore <.json file> <wallet_name> ?

Is that basically the same as File > Import Wallet ?

Offline Riverhead

Re: 0.4.10 Testers Wanted
« Reply #89 on: August 31, 2014, 03:09:00 am »
My balance is now showing as 0.00 -- I have a JSON backup. Am I ok? Did I just lose all of my investment?


Have you done wallet_backup_restore <.json file> <wallet_name> ?

Is that basically the same as File > Import Wallet ?


Yes I think so.