Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Just let me publish a feed for all the entries on coinmarketcap...
Its a simple formula, really:
BTS = 10*(BTC = 100*(XRP = 1000*(LTC = ...
What are "high risk merchants"?
Marijuana dealers in Colorado, adult industry, some subscription services, and merchants who are at a "high risk" for charge backs.
If we can find 1,000,000 people (Just 0.3% of US population) to each buy $100 worth of BTS then we will generate $100 million dollars worth of buying demand which directly helps fund the development of the tools of freedom.
Remember Ethercoin?
Same thing happened - reason is because market cap calculation takes the top price off the book and multiplies by the supply, which doesn't consider actual demand for the coin.
Full explanation:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11514.0
The problem with shorting these scams is, you have to asses how high they can go. Otherwise your margin could get called.Looks like it is centralized by "USD reserves":
Proof Of Reserve
PayCoin™ is backed by a fiat-based reserve of USD that shields early adopters from risk and increases acceptance by large institutions.
It's moments like these when I wish I could easily short these pump and dump coins.
Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
Yes, I really wish there was a way to short scam coins. BTS should eventually trade altcoins at some point, right?
I think right now people just really need to support the BTS price by buying BTS, rather than continuing to take all of the value in BTS, and throw it at every other thing in the bitshares ecosystem.
Unless I'm mistaken, any delegate not claiming 100% is burning the difference. So, I don't see it's controversial to put that difference for certain delegates into DVS.
I wonder if all the BTS not claimed by a delegate could automatically be thrown at DVS.. expecting that must make sense relative to the balance of transactions and the fees miners accept. That would then keep DVS floating at a point relative to BTS and the delegate average payrate. Given that most delegates are only getting 3%, that should be quite a lift to the value of DVS. That would give an incentive to those of us hosting devshares clients.. but perhaps that would be too much?.. Perhaps then 20% of what is not claimed by BTS delegates??
Basically you are saying that we should inflate BTS more, sell the BTS on the market, resulting in thousnads of BTS per day, per delegate that does this of extra selling pressure, in order to prop up the price of devshares.
To which I respond: HELL FUCKING NO, if we ever want our flagship product BTS to break out of this downtrend, we need to be buying it, not dumping more of it on the market to suppress the price.
It seems that Bitshares supporters are just really really good at coming up with every possible way to hurt the price of BTS. Its almost like you want it to fail.
Hi graffenwalder,
Are you certain that you exported the private key for that bitcoin address into Bitshares and that it was for an uncompressed WIF key?
I believe the bitcoin address for BTS7iENuLaQpFicLqv41MPWn1czM1SbGNGYDhQHDygffuNxJjifTG should be, 13e1RxUvGR9CTnfPXxXn8g9p3rsHtt5nnx
Can you run,
> wallet_account_list_public_keys graffenwalder
And check?
