Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gamey

Pages: 1 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151
2206
DAC PLAY / Re: Blockchain RNG with DPOS
« on: April 19, 2014, 06:54:57 pm »
I believe refusing to reveal should be punished very harshly.  There could be huge economic gain here.  If you are playing a game with a 50/50 proposition and wager 10 BTC.  If I am a delegate and do this when it will be my turn to reveal then my 10 BTC which had 0 expectation, now has 5 BTC expectation (at cost of refusing to reveal punishment).  This can be done in multiple small wagers.  This type of ability will attract nefarious delegates if the barrier to entry is low.

On the other hand if my delegate server goes down during the wrong time I don't want to be kicked off my position as a delegate..  Is there some way a delegate could give their S to another delegate to avoid the situation where they are removed from being a delegate due to network/server fault ?  Some form of redundancy?  I'd hate to lose all the investment towards being a delegate due to at technical glitch. (Possibly server redundancy?)

This also opens up a counter-exploit where someone can be DDOS'd into preventing their S revelation. How can the network decide intent !?

This last revealer aspect may have some underlying truth/law where you basically can not make RNG 100% fair.  I have thought about this stuff before and it always seems to come down to some variation on the problem.

EDIT -

There is another thought I had.  It might very well be that the volume of RNG relying transactions on any given block could be measured.  This volume could be weighed in the punishment phase.  If i refuse to reveal and there was a 10x spike in wagers, then well...  that looks a lot worse than if the volume of transactions relying on the RNG is typical.  Using this sort of technology you could use game-theory type stuff in the punishment phase and might have an alternative workable solution.


2207
So the idea that investors somehow could be hurt by a pump and dump doesn't make much sense. The only group of people who I could see who might get hurt are day traders who don't even think to find out what Bitshares is at all and who don't even download the client. These sorts of speculators can blame themselves for not learning what Bitshares is because if they understand what it is they could start speculating and day trading from within the client which is what we should want.

I don't even know where to start, so I'm not going to try hard. 

This is not productive for anyone.

Go look up zero sum game if you have no idea why someone could be hurt by a pump and dump.  (Although I am not sure markets are zero sum, I am under this impression at least)

You are going too much out of your way to be insulting and misrepresenting what I am saying.  Telling me I am confused, "finally numbers", etc.  Lol.  I don't think I did that to you, or at least i attempted to avoid as much. 

You write pages without specifics. You may not like my responses, but at least I read your posts.

Your problem is I believe that you actually use different definitions of things depending on what you are trying to accomplish. instead -  stick with trying to be better at conveying any ideas of merit you have.

For example, if I understand correctly, by your definitions you airdrop to people of note, but you form strategic alliances when you snapshot other's blockchains.  Just seems confusing and backwards to politely put it.

Anyway, keep working at getting the multipool on BTS.  I think it is a good idea.


edit -
Quote
This is a point which I expected to be obvious but I'll make it obvious. The Blackcoin community would benefit a lot from having BitAssets like BitUSD, BitBTC, and Bitshares in general.

It is obvious to me that BitAssets/Bitshares ecosystem would benefit all communities.  Why are you so stuck on Blackcoin ?  <scratches head>

2208

I can go show you other POS mining pools that aren't near as busy as blackcoinpool.  A wager would incentivize me to further the issue with you.

In the end, the guys with a lot of capital in mining etc are not going to mess with that stuff.  They'll just find the best BTC payout and buy BC when the market drops like any sharp player will.  blackcoipool has 7 mhash.  Wafflepool has over 30.  Why do you come to such conclusions that blackcoinpool type places are the future of mining ?

I find it a bit strange you lecturing me about learning about business.  I was suggesting same thing as you are, but with BTC.  You didn't want BTC, because you kept going on and on about how they have thieves in their mist, and centralization of power.  Reasons not really related to our business.

I will sum up your most interesting idea and I think what you've been getting at.

Blackcoin is full of pumpers.  To pump you need cheap and signficant shares and at a low price.  Snapshot airdropping to blackcoin would accomplish this bring these people in the fold for future DACs.

Is it good to airdrop to "marketing geniuses" aka guys who sit around and manipulate altcoin markets all day?  I can't say, but there is something there to consider.  I am not sure I want DAC shares inflated because I think it also leads to artificial crashes hurting people not in the game.  Pumpers play a zero sum game where the less sophisticated lose out repeatedly.

Blackcoin keeps going up. It'll be interesting to see if it sticks and for how long.

2209
Quote
The point is that Proof of Stake coins can only be marketed through virtual mining. That is the only way proven to work and Blackcoin is the first coin to successfully market a Proof of Stake coin and take on the Proof of Work titans. Blackcoin is in a position to threaten Litecoin now and it's Proof of Stake.

Blackcoin and Litecoin are fighting for the same demographics. They want the biggest investors, the most brilliant marketers, and the hashrate from the miners.

The reason Blackcoin is in a position to replace Litecoin is because Litecoin is about to transition into Scrypt ASICs. When this happens the advantage goes to Blackcoin who will now become the favorite among miners as Litecoin starts to develop it's mining cartel.

So I would not be surprised if we see Blackcoin going for $2-3 this year whether it goes through pump and dump cycles to reach it or not. I would like Bitshares to be up there along with Blackcoin in the #2 or #3 spot, but this is never going to be possible if we aren't measuring success based on market cap, daily volume, and other methods.

If you're measuring success on the technical merit of the Bitshares DPOS then I can say that Bitshares is technologically the most sophisticated and probably the best out there. But I measure success not just on technical merit but also on market cap, daily volume, and other factors.

If I judge by the success of Protoshares then I can say that while Protoshares held it's own with little to no grassroots marketing it never threatened Litecoin, it got dogged by Dogecoin, etc. Additionally most of us are already invested so unless we are planning on buying a whole of Bitshares all summer we are going to have to create buy support else you can expect a summer of low prices as people dump their Bitshares which they got for pennies each.


Proof of Stake coins can only be marketed through virtual mining?  How so ?

Every coin is fighting for that same demographic.

Blackcoin is not the first POS stake coin to be successfully marketed.  You missed NXT and Peercoin.

Quote
The reason Blackcoin is in a position to replace Litecoin is because Litecoin is about to transition into Scrypt ASICs. When this happens the advantage goes to Blackcoin who will now become the favorite among miners as Litecoin starts to develop it's mining cartel.

This argument could be said for a lot of coins.  I am pretty sure you are wrong about blackcoin (which you can't mine), becoming the favorite among miners.   The size of the blackcoin pool is still  small relatively speaking.  Other similar pools with similar purposes don't even touch blackcoinpool's size. You should also point out the altcoin paying multipools that are so small to not even have a measurable effect on the coin's marketcap.  Look at hashrate.org.  Why doesn't it work ?

No one here is against marketing/pumping.  I just don't understand why you think Blackcoin is a hive if marketing geniuses.  I don't understand what we can we get from "strategic partnerships" with them?  A pool that pays out 50/50 bc/bts ?  Well go talk to the guy who runs blackcoinpool and ask him what he'd charge for such a thing ?

 If you could price BTS really low, then sell it off to the right people, then maybe we could emulate Blackcoin because the right people would have incentives.  That isn't going to happen, so I just don't get why blackcoin.  Yes, they've grown.  Yes, we need to grow.

Instead of writing pages of this stuff where you give us questionable cause/effect, I would suggest heading to twitter and other forum's and pumping BTS.   IMO thats the only "genius" going on beyond that 1 week mining which created a shallow distribution.

I've suggested before that I3 makes a fund for people to go out there and support BTS.  People need incentives to do this.  Those incentives work better with shallow distributions if you want it to happen organically.  Otherwise people need other incentives....

I also don't understand "strategic partnerships" with blackcoin.  I do understand taking their best ideas and mulling them over to see if they fit.  A BTS paying pool is not a bad idea in any way, but thats not a strategic partnership.

In another thread, 4 people back to back questioned what was special about blackcoin.  No one questions whether emulating their multipool is a bad thing.  If you'd just stick with that, everyone would agree with you.  Instead you talk of "marketing geniuses" and "strategic partnerships" and I suspect a lot of us just sit back scratching our heads.

2210

I believe a lot of the pumping is done by pump and dumpers.

I am not sure about the cause/effect going on here that you are so certain.

I think that innovative, useful, and fun applications is what will drive users of Bitshares ecosystem more so than market cap.

You still haven't answered what is innovative about Blackcoin itself outside multipool ?

Usually for these pumps to work, the market has to be a bit ripe for manipulation.  Not sure if that'd ever work for Bitshares.  That might be why you see so many "marketing geniuses".  Blackcoin's 1 week only mining aspect is probably the most genius.  It is sorta like a premine, but will never be called one. 

Having a multipool that pays in Bitshares would be a good thing.  I support the idea in getting one.  Have a bounty put up once BTS are on an exchange. 

Just not sure how it all ties into Blackcoin so strongly, except that had the idea first ?

2211
Read the latest blog posting from the Blackcoin developers.

Legion Development Group
Excerpt
Quote
http://blackcoinpool.com/news/an-update-from-the-dev-team/
We have spoken with many crypto industry people, and everyone is very excited about the pool and the BlackCoin experiment. We are talking with industry leaders and are considering partnerships that would benefit our community and give us an additional competitive edge against other multipools.

We have also learned our lessons from the mayhem of this weekend, and have realized that we need a solution to mitigate or at least make it less lucrative for whales to dump.

Over the next few iterations we will be introducing the Alpha stages of our BlackCoin whale dumping mitigation strategy.

Soon it will be possible to donate a portion of your shares towards the Black Shield Defense fund. This is an address that we will publicly available and can be monitored through the blockchain. It's purpose is to erect buy walls on a predetermined exchange, the buy walls will be publicly listed, and can be seen by everyone.

These guys are brilliant. I don't think the success is an accident. The Bitshares community should learn from this and I can't wait to see a Bitsharespool.org site.

Brilliant in that wolong sort of way ? 

Why would you donate your money so that the "whales" can dump and get maximum value via the "buy wall" ?  Very centralized. 

You despise the BTC community so much, but I have yet to see what is special about blackcoin.  Critical pump levels ?

The mining of POS coins is now done by other pools.  Blackcoinpool has done the best job of that, but how can you separate the effects of everything else from the pool ?  Maybe success of the pool was driven by the success of the pumps ?  What else has blackcoin done besides pump their coin?  What innovation do they have ? 




2212
How did they solve the RNG problem?

https://github.com/dennismckinnon/Ethereum-Contracts/blob/master/Dennys%20Lotto/Lottery.lsp

Code: [Select]
[0x20] (prevhash)
[0x40] (coinbase)
[0x60] (SHA3 0x20 0x40) ;Random lottery
[0x80] (MOD @0x3 @@0x2) ;DRAW!

From explanation of the demo and code, it seems being use hash of (block info  and prevhash) to resolve the RNG.

I've enclosed this thread's link to Dennis, he perhaps can give more info on that if he come here.

I listened to his youtube on and off.   What I recall is that the "forum" thought hashing the block timestamp was a good idea, but Denny was against that. (for good reason..  the time stamp can be selected within a certain window.)  So he ended up using previous block + current block hashes.

2213
General Discussion / Re: Reaching out to the Left
« on: April 16, 2014, 01:26:41 am »

There is actually a good deal of overlap between the Occupy movement and the Tea Party.  This shared sentiment dovetails into themes of decentralization IMO.

2214

I haven't used mumble.  I am having a problem figuring out how to broadcast ?

It is hierarchical, with "BeyondBitcoin" at the top.  I do not know if I send messages to BeyondBitcoin if they are broadcast to everyone etc ?

All those rooms add to the confusion of it a bit.

I can hear bytemaster, but I do not know what room to type in for the meeting aspect ?  I can send him messages directly, but that defeats the purpose.

2215
Any idea why I cant get to the web address?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It requires that you download the mumble program.  It is not a web/html service.

If this doesn't help, you need to tell us what address isn't working.

2216
General Discussion / Re: Airdrop Ideas
« on: April 15, 2014, 08:07:16 pm »
Here are even more ideas people have not listed about snapshot airdrops.

You could make the airdrop expire in some manner.  Say 365 days worth of blocks later, the network churns through addresses and finds all wallets with no transfer.  Although that becomes hard to work in with the "can not transfer until X time" feature to prevent dumping.  This however removes all the dead/inefficient shares.  Which is the same thing the "claim" procedure does.

Airdrop/snapshot wallets can have random amounts.  The downside here is that you miss out on some customers who might have ended up being quality contributors to the market.  The upside is that the random amounts put in wallets add as an incentive for people to go look.  Maybe you had .0001 BTC but you might have $50 in USD equity after snapshot/airdrop.  I think it would add to the tweets, although a lot of people will be let down.  It does let you get substantial amounts to some % of people.  What it does do is add a sense of fun.  Instead of claiming your $.50, you look in your wallet to see if you have more.  It is something akin to airdropping scratch off tickets.

You could put up a few rather substantial winners so that the odds are it would take time for all grand winners to be claimed.  In that way you may possibly start a vibe going about trying to find who hasn't redeemed their shares.  It would be like a lotto, where it is known someone has won a fortune but no one yet knows who has won.

If you have a gaming DAC, perhaps you could write it so that the shares can only be transacted with the game server itself.  In effect, a freeplay type coupon like you might see at a casino.  This might work with other DACs too.

THis is why seeding btc owners etc useful for certain types of markets.  You're going to have a hard sell getting people who aren't already in the cryptoworld to buy in.  When a person has any existing crypto wallet, they're already customers of the greater crypto-system.  The fit is natural.

2217

There are a lot of ideas being floated that are being called airdrops.  I assume airdrop is an analogy to leaflets being dropped over an area.  An even distribution.  Then on bitshares.org the term was used with blockchains.

Now you guys talk about other things which no longer seem to even fit the analogy of airdrop.  This creates problems because the discussion of the merits of the blockchain airdrop are lost and it isn't even at odds with other suggested marketing ploys.  You're muddying the discussion and it doesn't help the 2 things to be discussed in a productive manner.

Personally, I'd like to see a group of guys who are passionate and read a lot of crypto-currency media (reddit..  everything)  and are willing to take the side of Bitshares.  I'd like to see someone who is in charge of a small pool of money to tip these people.  I see the competitor mentioned all too often and no Bitshares in sight.  This seems like it could be fixed and cheaply by finding the right guys in the community.

2218
DAC PLAY / Re: Need for a responsive RNG server
« on: April 13, 2014, 09:03:19 am »
Yes, 10 second interval is what I was thinking.  10-15 seconds as max time.  Even with modern internet gaming systems there are usually delays in action.  10-15 seconds is far better than 30 seconds +.
I think if you can get a RNG available within 10-15 seconds of request that meets all requirements you have a working solution given what I think to be needed.

I had read your paper before.  Section 8 is the part I am really interested in.  If you looking at which part to improve next, then go with # 8.

I'm still wrapping my head around everything in the lotto thread.  I don't quite understand all of it, but my early impression is that..

1) Do not rely heavily on which range of random numbers means a win.  This can vary hugely in any game.   If you put your lotto #s into your game-theory type calculations for possible exploits, it will hurt your solution for those who wish to use a more general case.
2) Relying on a singular trustee is no more or less centralized than my solution, but my solution can provide responsiveness by not having random number requests broadcast.

(I don't quite get who watches the trustee... If someone can explain that.. ??)

I like your responsiveness :) and willingness to exchange ideas.  I am not sure if this will attract any other devs, but the lotto case is a special case that avoids a lot of problems your typical gaming application might require.  I am just trying to push you guys into providing blockchain API type stuff that fits a more generalized gaming platform.

2219
BitShares AGS / Re: AGSExplorer Not accessible
« on: April 13, 2014, 06:40:07 am »
It is up for me.

2220
DAC PLAY / Re: Need for a responsive RNG generator.
« on: April 13, 2014, 03:16:57 am »
Where is lotto subforum ?

Pages: 1 ... 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151