Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Yea I'm talking about getting there.
is a trillion dollar market cap reasonable say even 20 years into the future, considering the vast sums of wealth contained in these markets??No, you are too conservative.
Am I delusional??
XAU is correct, however, nearly impossible to market to average folks.
bitGOLD and bitSILVER should be implemented before a mainstream marketing push.
QuoteI expected the price to rise sometime in probably the next few months, not necessarily real soon...the goal of the proposal is to avoid such free lunch an incentive traders to make more short/medium term predictions.
BTSX looks to me like its just starting another parabolic move. It looks just like the DOGE chart a week ago when DOGE was in the 60s. I just panic bought as much as I could!
We have a strategy for getting there that no coin, not even Bitcoin, can compete with.... it is still secret though
I have no idea how I can help. One thing that I think would help would be rewriting the entire wikipage to get rid of all the superfulous terminology and recast the idea in terms that people are already familiar with. And then redesign the client UI to hide nearly everything behind an "advanced user" interface (e.g. the typical user definitely does not need to see options for shorting, market depth charts, etc). But I doubt the community wants either of those, which is unfortunate since they are major stumbling blocks.
I'm trying to conceive a scenario in which some entity scoops BitsharesX, releases a knock-off and screws AGS/PTS/Community.
Can't come up with one that is viable.
At this point in time I can't see another group of devs jumping in and doing a better job at developing/marketing the platform, ie. winning the race.
In the future, once the platform is mature, I can't see another group of devs copying and adding enough gee-whiz to lure the community while simultaneously screwing the community.
In between, I can't see an attack or flaw that the devs/delegates could not fix/fork themselves.
Unless I'm missing something obvious this risk seems to be an armchair issue rather than something investors (myself included) need to worry about.
And finally... if someone rips off the code, what could they possibly call their knock-off that would compete with the Bitshares branding (CitiBank? Wells Fargo? BOA?).
I'm becoming convinced. Is it true that the community would view any new DAC designed to function as a currency as a competitor to BitShares X and thus will not launch such a DAC (at least not with broad community support)?
It makes it sound like bitsharesX is just a one particular set of DACs, but that the core developers and perhaps the community are not committed to working towards bitsharesX becoming the main way of moving money around, making mobile retail payments, etc.
I am curious how did you get to that conclusion?
-Was it from the fact that the whole dev team is working well more than 8h a day on it, and in my observation 6 (and quite likely 7) days a week.
-Was it from to fact that some of that team have promising DAC's of their own, that are left for later, while BTSX is rapidly developed.
-Is it due to versions coming every 2 to 4 days.
-was it due to the fact that new features (and significantly new) are coming at least once a week.
