Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - rgcrypto

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 38
256
General Discussion / VOAT - Bitshares? Graphene? Smartcoin?
« on: June 14, 2015, 02:32:39 am »
After reddit started censoring subreddits, the free market is moving liberty minded people to http://voat.co which is a promising new platform and so far welcoming to crypto-currencies in general.

Now which sub-category do you think we should use? Bitshares(/v/bitshares)? Graphene or Smartcoin(/v/smartcoin)

They are probably hungry for funding their developments...any ideas we could pitch to them to integrate bitshares 2.0 has a way to fund their operations?

257
Technical Support / Re: A Different Type of Workers Contract
« on: June 13, 2015, 09:03:57 pm »
The question is: what would we do if 2 different parties solves a problem simultaneously?

How do we reach the consensus to release the funds? (or if the objectives has been attained?)

258
wait until they find out about bitshares

259
I don't know if the team has to address newmine specifically, since he has a tendency to sound a bit too aggressive (entertaining as it is), but the community's brewing concerns should definitely be addressed as it looks like the investor's interests and the interests of the development team may be diverging.

As things stand, Cryptonomex' hypothetical corporate gig could be actually worth more - and be far more liquid - than their entire BTS stake. Hell, it could be bigger than the entire BTS market cap.

As I understand it, the original investors were promised a stake in I3's future projects and Graphine is certainly the result of a two-year trial&error experimentation between  developers, investors, traders and the market realities. Now, that is not to say that the shareholders "own" Daniel Larimer and everything he does for the rest of his life. But it starts to look like Cryptonomex is becoming a competitor to Bitshares as it's corporate shares may be a better deal than BTS. That perception of project's self-cannibalization cannot be in Daniel's own interest either.

All those concerns about the future of Bitshares support and BTS value can be alleviated with a sharedrop - a decisive realigning of incentives between developers and investors.

Later on in the process of building bitshares,  BM clarified that these promises were not legally binding and that our ags donations and pts stake were not investnents...but more like crowdfunding donations. 

This is why I've stated two things:
1) the community's unwillingness to provide devs with living wages  might end up costing us significantly and
2) We should, as a community, try to come up with ways to remediate the situation

And the SEC sees that these 'donations' are now 'shares' in a company... OUUU GOODY.. we got another one of these crypto-tard bitcoin thingies we can nail to the wall for SEC violation in selling unregistered securities. Good-bye BitShares.

Seriously, think big picture and understand that Dan et all are doing their best to lead us forward.

I am not going to participate in any kind of hangout where someone else is going to discuss how to dictate to someone else how they are going to run their company without even the directors of said company being present. This is turning into mob FUD and it should end right here.

Have a hangout about features in BitShares 2.0 and ways it can work better, I will gladly participate. Not how we are entitled to tell someone else how to run their business.


The force is strong within you young padawan.

260

No because I'm not getting distracted from the good work the devs have done this week to winge about the cost of keeping them here to innovate for us.

Couldn't have said it better.

261
I am sure you've learned a ton from this experience. You had great design and great execution but the offer to market match wasn't completely align. It happens!
.
Anyhow, I'm glad you are in our community

262
I wish you can own those bitassets once privatized and make a fortune! :)

263
Technical Support / A Different Type of Workers Contract
« on: June 13, 2015, 02:26:44 pm »
Quote
Sounds like we need a smart contract that pays out on milestones rather than time
- Riverhead

Will there be different types of contracts for workers?
Could there be a type contract that is only released upon completion?

This way, we may have "bounties" that anyone in the community could jump on and get rewarded for.

ei: Find a new fiat gateway, connect our mumble into the let's talk bitcoin (like SAFE did), etc.


264
we give this guy far too much attention.
amen

265
yah man! Thanks

266
I think I peed a little...

267
Technical Support / Re: lost funds?
« on: June 12, 2015, 06:30:21 pm »
Thanks for the support. going back 22000 actually worked.

268
Technical Support / How to test the new bitshares 2.0?
« on: June 12, 2015, 03:14:11 pm »
Is it possible to test bitshares 2.0 right now or only look at the code?

269
General Discussion / Re: New bitshares.org Feedback
« on: June 12, 2015, 03:11:54 pm »
I really like it. It's clean and professional and you capture emails.

2 thumbs up and  +5%

270
Technical Support / Re: lost funds?
« on: June 12, 2015, 05:16:53 am »
thanks roadscape

I've stepped it up to wallet_regenerate_keys ACCOUNT-NAME 22000

the other commands didn't work

Will see in 24h after the download :(


Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 38