Most current Crypto Currencies are very difficult, if not impossible to change, especially if their inflation rate, or the amount of the currency that is put into production at any point in time is hard coded. We consider all such as dumb currencies. The smartest coins are coins that are most able to rapidly and decisively act with significant improvements and well timed changes in the market place. We believe the smartest coins will, in the long run, vastly out compete all dumb coins. We predict that people supporting dumb coins will do so, till the market proves to them the superiority of smart coins, and after they have lost significant capital betting on losing flash in the pan dumb coins.

Most current Crypto Currencies are very difficult, if not impossible to change, especially if their inflation rate, or the amount of the currency that is put into production at any point in time is hard coded. We consider all such as dumb currencies.

Quote from: zonda on July 25, 2014, 10:54:54 pm

When will they increase the withdraw limit?

I just asked this question to bter support today, but no answer yet........a 5k withdraw limit on a token that cost's 0.0000154, is nothing short of just stupid.....

Just a thought on penalizing people who don't vote...Keeping mind that I am no expert on this stuff by any means. I barely get it in many ways....BUT i would say that I think someone needs to focus a lot on the usability of the system for it's intended purpose by it's intended USERS

How much thought, time, energy do the expected USERS of the system want to put into VOTING?  Is that why they are using the system so they can spend time evaluating DELEGATES and voting for them?  I don't think so.  Sometimes we can get so caught up in the myriad of interesting and sometimes marginally more beneficial ways to do something and forget about how we encourage adoption and continued use of the system. 

Speaking for myself, I am for the Keep It Simple System as much as possible.  I don't want to spend much if any time voting for delegates....but I do want the system to be safe and secure.

2) The default wallet can hard-code the developers own account as the default recommendation

I barely get it in many ways....

Lol @ me being example bad guy.  How'd people figure it out ?!

Quote from: Empirical1 on July 25, 2014, 03:55:17 am

Ok I can see the need for something like this now that I'm thinking of voting myself.

I like to keep a portion of my stuff in cold storage & I don't want to have to access my funds just to change my vote every few weeks. Voting for a few people I really trust that maintain good slates passes the burden to my favourite delegates to actively police the system and as a result I'd only have to get involved in an ermegency. (Also it's unlikely an avg. shareholder can be expected to form an opinion on more than +-15 candidates I would guess.)

Though I agree with Gamey that from a marketing perspective it 'feels' like a negative. (Also enjoying reading your thoughts Gamey on how it could change the incentives.)

Personally I'd like to be able to actively change votes of BTSX I have in cold storage but it doesn't seem like that would be technically possible.

Empirical, you are not understanding the proposal.  You still can't change your votes without making a transaction.  You vote for a particular slate but if the person whose slate you chose changes their preferred slate, the slate you voted for does not automatically update.  You would have to vote again.

If the proposal allowed you to just defer your voting to someone else and let them vote on your behalf it would be an even worse idea than it is already.

I think @bytemaster may pack the openssl dll with the install file. maybe it can slove the problem.