Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - roelandp

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
1
General Discussion / Re: To switch to feed real market price in CNY market?
« on: December 26, 2018, 10:56:12 pm »
Quote from: finn-bts on December 26, 2018, 10:55:05 am
Quote from: bitcrab on December 26, 2018, 08:33:55 am
proxy bitcrab will vote these witnesses out tomorrow morning if they do not change, give them some time to response.
I think we should also try to contact witnesses who offer too low a price and ask them to provide an accurate price.

:) would have loved to hear something, but have to blame myself for not shutting of BSIP42 earlier. Have done so earlier today. Wishing you all a good New Year's Eve (for the western's)

2
中文(Chinese) / Re: mssr不逐渐改成100bts的稳定币永远不可能稳定
« on: December 26, 2018, 09:24:30 pm »
FYI sorry for my slow reply. I have adjusted my pricefeeds to go non-bsip42, so will again publish real market price if revoted.

Thank you for understanding and sorry I have missed these messages.

Looking forward to implementing other BSIPs should they gain enough votes and consensus.

非常感謝你。 祝你今天愉快。roelandp

3
General Discussion / Re: To switch to feed real market price in CNY market?
« on: December 26, 2018, 02:15:13 pm »
I have removed bsip42 - will write a script to monitor the voting poll asap. I was in Xmas mode a bit too much. Thank you for considering revoting me @bitcrab @alt @xeroc. :humblebow:

4
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] OpenSource Bitshares Mobile App Proposal
« on: December 07, 2018, 09:39:56 pm »
looks good will vote asap.

please make the language files available so the community can help translate your app.

great work!

5
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 31, 2018, 10:30:52 pm »
Update: Winners have been announced on steemit.com/@bitshares-at-sf , first tickets have been issued. I've added another ticket for Bitshares.fdn (next to Ms Dirkes her colleague will join).
Bitshares stickers have been shipped to Kraków straight from the printer. Will share some pictures from SteemFest and logo outings / bitshares presence afterwards.

SteemFest is upcoming week, it would be great to see you there:  https://steemfest.com

6
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 12, 2018, 11:46:45 pm »
Update: Bitshares elected spokesperson, Annemieke Dirkes from Bitshares Blockchain Foundation, will present a Bitshares related slot on SteemFest3 in Kraków!
If you can't make it, we will livestream the whole event via https://steemit.com/@steemfest
8 & 9 november conference days. Annemieke will talk on 8 November.

7
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 12, 2018, 11:45:23 pm »
Update: designer made the Bitshares banner (part of the sponsorship):


click for original
Click here for the original PDF design, which you can also use to print your own copy

8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 10, 2018, 08:41:15 pm »
Hey yeah I also have that design, but I generally don't like "white background" stickers to be honest. The one I found is a nice cutout rounded-rectangle and this one looks pretty nice. I'm happy to order the other color's set too btw :)

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 09, 2018, 09:19:29 pm »
update:

designed sticker for bitshares today which will be handed out in the goodiebag to all attendees.

preview:


- sticker will be finished on a cutout with rounded corners
- sticker will be printed on vinyl / outdoor durable quality
- i can print 1000 for 5 euro extra (vs 500) so I can bring some home / distribute on future events / snail mail you if you want (after SteemFest !)

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 07, 2018, 10:43:00 pm »
Update

- as the worker progressed and is still voted in (still with a tiny percentage, but hey life is all about risks :P) we've commenced with announcing the ticket-raffles for BTS and seeing quite some participations:
https://steemit.com/steemfest/@bitshares-at-sf/bitshares-sponsors-steemfest3-in-krakow-and-gives-away-5-full-conference-tickets

- the "bitshares sponsors steemfest" announcement had then also received a paragraph in the official weekly SteemFest announcement:
https://steemit.com/steemfest/@roelandp/steemfest3-updates-new-ticket-giveaway-updates-new-names-added-8-and-our-very-own-hardfork

- and was announced in a newsletter to about 900 people in the weekly SteemFest newsletter:
https://mailchi.mp/abe8ba203174/steemfest-3-update-7-its-a-girl

The logo of Bitshares has been added to the site, newsletter layout, weekly announcements and all digital ticket pdfs issued from last week onwards. Examples of the (non digital) on-site / reallife presence of Bitshares will be shared as Steemfest is happening / when arriving in Kraków.

11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: October 03, 2018, 09:53:47 pm »
Update.

Currently the worker is voted in, but it is still open for voting obviously. The worker has been receiving some funds. Thank you for your trust!

Step 1 of the milestones has completed and the "risk-leap" has been taken to officially grant Bitshares the sponsorship to SteemFest.

- Currently the Bitshares logo / link is being included on all tickets, newsletters and on the SteemFest website and forthcoming official Steemfest announcements on Steem chain.
- This week the first give-away SteemFest tickets competitions via "Bitshares at SteemFest" will be starting following the OP's / worker proposals setup.
- A dedicated Steem account bitshares-at-sf has been registered and will be used for this purpose only.

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: September 28, 2018, 02:43:22 pm »
Quote from: clockwork on September 28, 2018, 01:43:52 pm
Quote from: roelandp on September 28, 2018, 11:34:45 am
Quote from: oxarbitrage on September 27, 2018, 11:04:47 pm
voted for this one as i think is definitely a good idea to have bitshares exposed in this event.

thanks!

update: at the moment the worker is funded, but barely. If Openledger sells some BTS it's out again.
Any votes really help to lock this in. If the coming time I get 1/2 more votes, I will progress with the deal and start setting up the bitshares @ steemfest - give away campaigns on Steem.

voted a while back...just saying :)

thank you too @clockworkgr ! have a nice weekend!

13
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal 1.14.123 - SteemFest³ Sponsorship by Bitshares
« on: September 28, 2018, 11:34:45 am »
Quote from: oxarbitrage on September 27, 2018, 11:04:47 pm
voted for this one as i think is definitely a good idea to have bitshares exposed in this event.

thanks!

update: at the moment the worker is funded, but barely. If Openledger sells some BTS it's out again.
Any votes really help to lock this in. If the coming time I get 1/2 more votes, I will progress with the deal and start setting up the bitshares @ steemfest - give away campaigns on Steem.

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP42: adjust price feed dynamically
« on: September 24, 2018, 08:20:14 am »
Quote from: bitcrab on September 23, 2018, 07:55:37 pm
Quote from: roelandp on September 22, 2018, 01:22:44 pm
@abit I'm walking around here on Bitfest and we've been discussing the BSIP42. If we are looking into updating the software with a future hardfork or major release, irregardless of whether to continue the BSIP 42 or it might get voted out we could move and seperate the "pricefeed"-data and the "premium" (modifier) data into a new variable set by witnesses publishing this 'modifier/premium'.

What I would propose is for

- transparency
- useability of the actual market reflecting pricefeeds

to have next to the  quote/base data per asset also a new variable, namely a 'premium' or 'modifier / premium / feedback'-float to be set per asset. This modifier/premium can then be set irregardless of the pricefeed publishing (or together, but ideally also seperate `publish_modifier`) and can be a 'median of medians' .

1. This would mean that witnesses can continue to publish pricefeeds according to the old "market reflecting" data as sampled from all sources.
2. The pricefeed data reflects "true" reflection of the market and can continue to be used as trusted source for input for other projects whatever they may be.
3. Then inside the new software version code the final price to be calculated could be as simple as "pricefeed median * 'modifier median".

- If BSIP42 gets voted out it could be as simple as everyone publishing a "1.0"-value as "modifier".
- If BSIP42 stays active it is way easier to see witnesses' premiums/modifiers and the pricefeeds can stay usefull for other projects beyond and inside the Bitshares realm.

actually I think one other solution may be better: keep feed price as the "real market price" as before, and let witnesses adjust MCR based on the premium/discount get from market. this will give same impact to the the market as BSIP42 and can lead to pegging accuracy.

this need not to add more variables, but need to overcome some technical problem/fix some bugs as @abit has mentioned.

however I think either solution need a long time(several months?) to fix bugs or even do hard fork,  I don't think we should just wait for the solution come, we can just push BSIP42 at current time to make smartcoins better, until the "transparent" solution come.

Yes indeed changing the MCR would be the best solution, but if it would be technically unfeasible or to much demanding for the chain the suggested solution might at least be a good alternative i think, especially since I think that it might be easier to integrate with the current software instead of changing much to the Smart Assets code.

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP42: adjust price feed dynamically
« on: September 22, 2018, 01:22:44 pm »
@abit I'm walking around here on Bitfest and we've been discussing the BSIP42. If we are looking into updating the software with a future hardfork or major release, irregardless of whether to continue the BSIP 42 or it might get voted out we could move and seperate the "pricefeed"-data and the "premium" (modifier) data into a new variable set by witnesses publishing this 'modifier/premium'.

What I would propose is for

- transparency
- useability of the actual market reflecting pricefeeds

to have next to the  quote/base data per asset also a new variable, namely a 'premium' or 'modifier / premium / feedback'-float to be set per asset. This modifier/premium can then be set irregardless of the pricefeed publishing (or together, but ideally also seperate `publish_modifier`) and can be a 'median of medians' .

1. This would mean that witnesses can continue to publish pricefeeds according to the old "market reflecting" data as sampled from all sources.
2. The pricefeed data reflects "true" reflection of the market and can continue to be used as trusted source for input for other projects whatever they may be.
3. Then inside the new software version code the final price to be calculated could be as simple as "pricefeed median * 'modifier median".

- If BSIP42 gets voted out it could be as simple as everyone publishing a "1.0"-value as "modifier".
- If BSIP42 stays active it is way easier to see witnesses' premiums/modifiers and the pricefeeds can stay usefull for other projects beyond and inside the Bitshares realm.


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6