1
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« on: May 20, 2014, 01:55:50 pm »
Why different memory usage and floating gpu load? (94-98%) 2 7870 card.
4295cpm its good? 8sh/min
4295cpm its good? 8sh/min
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Vendor of used platform (#2 / 2): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Name of device #1 / 2 (deviceID 0): Pitcairn
Name of device #2 / 2 (deviceID 1): Pitcairn
[MASTER] | Spawning 10 worker threads
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER3] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER8] Hello, World![WORKER2] Hello, World!
[WORKER5] Hello, World![WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER9] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER1] Hello, World!
Try to login with oldpioner.old1
connected to ypool.net:8083
xpt: Logged in with oldpioner.old1
[MASTER] @ 20:30:22 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
crashSun Mar 02 23:02:02 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:11 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:12 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:13 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:15 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM
164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM 164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:02:17 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:19 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:23 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:27 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM
164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM 164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM
165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM 165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM
165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM 165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:03:01 2014 Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m
) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 HPM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Total CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 H
PM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:49 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:55 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM
166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM 166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:03:58 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:03 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM
166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM 166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:04:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:26 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM
167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM 167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM
167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM 167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:04:44 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:50 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:54 2014 Share accepted
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 428.5714 Shares total: 1
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.3000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 592.0000 Shares total: 6
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 532.1739 Shares total: 7
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 592.2581 Shares total: 9
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 566.1538 Shares total: 9
collisions/min: 546.3830 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 519.2727 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 520.0000 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 508.7324 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 505.8228 Shares total: 10
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 525.5172 Shares total: 11
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
collisions/min: 538.1053 Shares total: 11
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 534.7573 Shares total: 12
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 540.5405 Shares total: 12
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 554.6218 Shares total: 13
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 553.7008 Shares total: 14
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 553.7778 Shares total: 15
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 556.3636 Shares total: 15
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
collisions/min: 0.0000 Shares total: 16
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 648.0000 Shares total: 16
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 606.6667 Shares total: 17
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 572.3077 Shares total: 17
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 564.7059 Shares total: 18
pts1gh 24 shares per 3 min =8/1minDoes it really has that fee on 1gh? Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:
PtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):
MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf0
1. Supports to AMD display card added.
2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.
3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.
Net performance list for AMD cards:
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.
HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB: 100-110 collisions/minute.
This code is based on the pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 release and inherits
its command line interface and options.
-a, --algo=ALGO specify the algorithm to use (default is scrypt)
scrypt scrypt Salsa20/8(1024, 1, 1), PBKDF2(SHA2)
scrypt:N scrypt Salsa20/8(N, 1, 1), PBKDF2(SHA2)
scrypt-jane scrypt Chacha20/8(N, 1, 1), PBKDF2(Keccak)
scrypt-jane:Coin
Coin must be one of the supported coins.
scrypt-jane:Nfactor
scrypt-chacha20/8(2*2^Nfactor, 1, 1)
scrypt-jane:StartTime,Nfmin,Nfmax
like above nFactor derived from Unix time.
sha256d SHA-256d (don't use this! No GPU acceleration)
keccak Keccak256 as used in MaxCoin
We have introduced minimal deposit limit since Jan5.
And the system will not process PTS deposit before they accumulate to 0.5. I am afraid your issue is due to too small transaction.
Please not, if you deposit PTS less than the minimal amount each time, your last deposit will not show even when you reach the 0.5 Limit. It will show next time you reach 0.5 limit
768M actually, but OS needs some for its own needs too. Like, to show windows on the screen etc.And if the second card, 500 MB is not enough too?
Seems min 800mb,why should they make people use a different pool than their own... strange idea ^^That's because the algorithm needs full 512M just for hashes, and then some to search for solutions. Host-device memory transfers are quite expensive in OpenCL, if the job cannot be done in just VRAM, it is going to be real slow.
neeeeed a 512mb vram version tho :S (why not accept parameters like other miners??)