Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - old_pioner

Pages: [1] 2
1
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« on: May 20, 2014, 01:55:50 pm »
Why different memory usage and floating gpu load? (94-98%) 2 7870 card.

4295cpm its good? 8sh/min

2
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: April 25, 2014, 04:39:33 pm »
Code: [Select]
Vendor of used platform (#2 / 2): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
        Name of device #1 / 2 (deviceID 0): Pitcairn
        Name of device #2 / 2 (deviceID 1): Pitcairn


[MASTER] | Spawning 10 worker threads
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER3] Hello, World!
[WORKER4] Hello, World!
[WORKER8] Hello, World![WORKER2] Hello, World!

[WORKER5] Hello, World![WORKER7] Hello, World!
[WORKER9] Hello, World!
[WORKER6] Hello, World!
[WORKER1] Hello, World!

Try to login with oldpioner.old1
connected to ypool.net:8083
xpt: Logged in with oldpioner.old1
[MASTER] @ 20:30:22 | work received | sharetarget 0x0080000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000
crash
how to run?
clpts_x86-64 -o 6 PZqTZmi1ZaRc1pfEvHiDHeXCjCJCRGuy7L -u oldpioner.old1 -p 4444 -a 1
pause

3
OK, i did compare 1gh vs gpuz0.4c
Code: [Select]
Sun Mar 02 23:02:02 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:11 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:12 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:13 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:15 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM
 164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 460.00 HPM (15m) 164.67 | CPM 458.96 HPM 164.30 | A/R 10/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:02:17 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:19 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:23 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:02:27 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM
 164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 469.71 HPM (15m) 165.14 | CPM 468.81 HPM 164.82 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM
 165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 482.00 HPM (15m) 165.50 | CPM 481.19 HPM 165.22 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM
 165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 488.89 HPM (15m) 165.78 | CPM 488.15 HPM 165.53 | A/R 14/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:03:01 2014 Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m
) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 HPM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)
Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014  Total CPM (15m) 493.60 HPM (15m) 166.00 | CPM 492.93 H
PM 165.78 | A/R 14/0 (0.00% rej)Share accepted

Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:41 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:49 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:03:55 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM
 166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 560.00 HPM (15m) 193.09 | CPM 483.18 HPM 166.60 | A/R 20/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:03:58 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:03 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM
 166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 558.00 HPM (15m) 191.00 | CPM 487.02 HPM 166.70 | A/R 22/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:04:14 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:26 2014 Share accepted
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM
 167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 557.54 HPM (15m) 189.54 | CPM 491.42 HPM 167.06 | A/R 24/0 (0.00
% rej)
Worker 0-0 GeForce GTX 650 Ti CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM
 167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00% rej)
Total CPM (15m) 554.86 HPM (15m) 188.00 | CPM 493.24 HPM 167.12 | A/R 24/0 (0.00
% rej)
Sun Mar 02 23:04:44 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:50 2014 Share accepted
Sun Mar 02 23:04:54 2014 Share accepted
Code: [Select]
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 428.5714 Shares total: 1
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.3000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 592.0000 Shares total: 6
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 532.1739 Shares total: 7
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 592.2581 Shares total: 9
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 566.1538 Shares total: 9
collisions/min: 546.3830 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 519.2727 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 520.0000 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 508.7324 Shares total: 9
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 505.8228 Shares total: 10
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 525.5172 Shares total: 11
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
collisions/min: 538.1053 Shares total: 11
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
collisions/min: 534.7573 Shares total: 12
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 540.5405 Shares total: 12
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 554.6218 Shares total: 13
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 553.7008 Shares total: 14
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 553.7778 Shares total: 15
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 556.3636 Shares total: 15
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.7000
New block data - height: 57956 tx count: 28
collisions/min: 0.0000 Shares total: 16
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 648.0000 Shares total: 16
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 606.6667 Shares total: 17
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
collisions/min: 572.3077 Shares total: 17
Rounds per second for Nvidia GPU 0: 2.8000
Share found! (BlockHeight: 57956)
Invalid share
Reason: unknown-work
collisions/min: 564.7059 Shares total: 18
pts1gh 24 shares per 3 min =8/1min
gpuz0.4c good start (11 shares in first minute) and bad finish, only rejects, total shares 18/3min = 6/1min.
Good joob, Reorder!  :)
Forget, fee 1?% vs 5%

4
Написал им, транзакции выложил туда, но заметил, что адрес кошелька поменялся на бтер, видимо в начале февраля, выходит они меняют адреса депозита периодически, получается ушло в никуда :)
Точно, блокэсплорер пишет Not a valid address. Так что это неверное предположение, что не ушло, ушло и не вернулось на локальный кошель.

5
26-го, 27-го на бтер отправлял монеты, не появились, кошель вчера вообще не пахал, когда слал, не помню работал он или нет. Как их вернуть теперь после ребрендинга этого?

6
Does it really has that fee on 1gh? ;) Because this is the part of protocol we decided to ignore, does not feel fair.
Not 1gh get fee. Look dev. readme:
Quote
PtsGPUz v0.4 (2014-01-28):
MD5 of PtsGPUz0.4.exe: 766a4dd7a1babfff176df3855c70caf0
1. Supports to AMD display card added.
2. Fee rate reduced to 5%.
3. SM (Shader Model) 3.5 code generation added for Nvidia card like GeForce GTX 780Ti.
Net performance list for AMD cards:
HD7850, 1024SP, 256bit, 2GB: 470-500 collisions/minute.
HD6670, 480SP, 128bit, 1GB:  100-110 collisions/minute.

7
Lol _PtsGPUz0.4 - 5% fee, and he is not fast, cudaminer better but did not work here, maybe have not kernel for pts.
Quote
This code is based on the pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 release and inherits
its command line interface and options.

  -a, --algo=ALGO       specify the algorithm to use (default is scrypt)
                          scrypt       scrypt Salsa20/8(1024, 1, 1), PBKDF2(SHA2)
                          scrypt:N     scrypt Salsa20/8(N, 1, 1), PBKDF2(SHA2)
                          scrypt-jane  scrypt Chacha20/8(N, 1, 1), PBKDF2(Keccak)
                          scrypt-jane:Coin
                                       Coin must be one of the supported coins.
                          scrypt-jane:Nfactor
                                       scrypt-chacha20/8(2*2^Nfactor, 1, 1)
                          scrypt-jane:StartTime,Nfmin,Nfmax
                                       like above nFactor derived from Unix time.
                          sha256d      SHA-256d (don't use this! No GPU acceleration)
                          keccak       Keccak256 as used in MaxCoin

8
too many idiotts on the pool, no profit. :o

9
They wrote:
Quote
We have introduced minimal deposit limit since Jan5.
And the system will not process PTS deposit before they accumulate to 0.5. I am afraid your issue is due to too small transaction.
Please not, if you deposit PTS less than the minimal amount each time, your last deposit will not show even when you reach the 0.5 Limit. It will show next time you reach 0.5 limit

10
Found:
 0.10909446 PTS PbFmDH5TqZViVm4TR2e4p9H4DqDYpUKdnN

        N: 11
        Required sigs: 1
        Type: pubkeyhash
        Script pub key (ASM): OP_DUP OP_HASH160 247f819a62f494174688c825977736841d5efc17 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
        Script pub key (hex): 76a914247f819a62f494174688c825977736841d5efc1788ac
And what now?

11
And coins disappear: 26    2014-01-16 02:55:51 (15 hours ago)    0.10909446    685c25cb614ef564c52cbf362b4f85bd5e0e02ac67bde4759a3b1fd512d99a4b
 went to the bter and nothing came.

12
For example GTX 780 he writes a maximum of 24 warp, but in fact their for her 48
App for check it: http://a0.sderni.ru/d/558165/deviceQuery.exe

13
Did u used cuda optimisation like here? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.0
But developer used only 50% cuda kit.

14
768M actually, but OS needs some for its own needs too. Like, to show windows on the screen etc.
And if the second card, 500 MB is not enough too?

15
why should they make people use a different pool than their own... strange idea ^^

neeeeed a 512mb vram version tho :S (why not accept parameters like other miners??)
That's because the algorithm needs full 512M just for hashes, and then some to search for solutions. Host-device memory transfers are quite expensive in OpenCL, if the job cannot be done in just VRAM, it is going to be real slow.
Seems min 800mb,     

but the memory controller loaded little, can there be provision for an upgrade?

Pages: [1] 2