106
General Discussion / Re: Proposal: If the supply is about to go below 2bn, save up for a dividend instead
« on: November 22, 2014, 06:35:50 pm »
Great concept. Great to market that. I have no clue about the economics of it.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If I understand this correctly than this is a scenario you'd like to see:
I run a node at 100% pay but only keep enough of it for a bit of income for myself, expenses to run the node, and the rest I pay out the people that would provide non technical work like Vato and MeTHoDx. This would save them from the chore of having to run a node and it would save me doing a crappy job at what they are good at. We'd agree on a percentage cut of the node, or as things grow a salary.
There isn't any reason such a person couldn't work for multiple nodes. Or, put another way, I could coordinate with say Xeroc and GaltReport to fund MeTHoDx.
- I'm ready to buy! PM'ed you.right back at you
Sure, let people do what they want. It's a partly-free country ( )...but keeping the same name would be dishonest IMHO because it is not the same "coin" and doesn't represent the same value proposition.
What's different about the value proposition? It grants holders a 10% stake in new DACs. How is that different from the old PTS?
Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
It's not backed by the development nor funding of the AGS fund.