Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GaltReport

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 46
106
Great concept.  Great to market that.  I have no clue about the economics of it.

107
General Discussion / Re: Invite only community marketing forum.
« on: November 21, 2014, 04:09:29 pm »
Registered.

108
 +5% - Looks Great!

109
General Discussion / Re: The new BitShares.org site is coming soon!
« on: November 20, 2014, 02:18:23 am »
 +5% Very nice work!

110
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Warning For Delegates Producing Price Feeds
« on: November 13, 2014, 10:21:29 pm »
Okay, thanks.  Got it to work.  Nice little patch!

111
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Warning For Delegates Producing Price Feeds
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:48:40 pm »
Thanks for the heads up.  Where is your patch?  I don't see it on github.

112
General Discussion / Re: My preferred solution for delegates
« on: November 12, 2014, 12:56:39 am »
If I understand this correctly than this is a scenario you'd like to see:

I run a node at 100% pay but only keep enough of it for a bit of income for myself, expenses to run the node, and the rest I pay out the people that would provide non technical work like Vato and MeTHoDx. This would save them from the chore of having to run a node and it would save me doing a crappy job at what they are good at. We'd agree on a percentage cut of the node, or as things grow a salary.

There isn't any reason such a person couldn't work for multiple nodes. Or, put another way, I could coordinate with say Xeroc and GaltReport to fund MeTHoDx.

I'm down for that if BM approves.

113
+5% - I'm ready to buy!  PM'ed you.
right back at you ;D

 +5% - Thanks, that was super fast and worked great!  Just a few clicks and I had it applied to my amazon account.


114
 +5% - I'm ready to buy!  PM'ed you.

115
Sure, let people do what they want.  It's a partly-free country ( :( )...but keeping the same name would be dishonest IMHO because it is not the same "coin" and doesn't represent the same value proposition.

What's different about the value proposition? It grants holders a 10% stake in new DACs. How is that different from the old PTS?

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

It's not backed by the development nor funding of the AGS fund.

Yeah, mainly doesn't convey the promise of future BM/I3 DAC sharedrops.

116
General Discussion / Re: Should we kill the DACronym?
« on: November 10, 2014, 04:55:35 pm »
 +5% for Decentralized Application Platform (DAP).

117
Sure, let people do what they want.  It's a partly-free country ( :( )...but keeping the same name would be dishonest IMHO because it is not the same "coin" and doesn't represent the same value proposition.

118
Random Discussion / Re: What happens when you're the first black president?
« on: November 09, 2014, 09:04:26 pm »
Whether you are a wolf or a wolf in sheep's clothing...you are still a wolf.  Either way you get the same results.  Just different wedge issues to divide people by and create the illusion of choice.

119
The confusion is that we were told that PTS was being mergred into BTS which implies it won't exist anymore.  Then some people got upset about this so we were told it is really a "sharedrop" to PTS rather than a "merge".  This implies the possibility of continued existence of PTS.  This idea was further advance by saying that "future DACs" could still snapshot PTS (which PTS?  The "final" PTS snapshot or some continued existing PTS?).

I think this is what happens when you try to please everyone.

120
IDentabit / Re: John Underwood Visit
« on: November 08, 2014, 07:23:02 pm »
Nice! My wife is from Philippines and thus we have a lot of friends/relatives there as well.  It seems all of them are sending $$$ back to PI.  It would be cool if they could start sending BitUSD!!  Maybe get point-of-sale systems in some of the Filipino stores that cater to the expat community here.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 46