@Permie thank you for your good words..

The idea of Construction was indeed a real world application but unfortunately the community didn't see much value in this..Out of the $10,000 max amount to raise with min target $1,000 I have raised the incredibly amount of $25 from one person who I returned to him $30 for his trust (if I remember correctly). Since then the token is no longer for real application but only donation (such as Brownies.PTS) with no obligation from my side what so ever.

Since it was launched as a donation token, 2,000 construction have been sold for 100,000 bts. Yesterday I bought them back for 110,000 bts so those who bought them made a 10% profit in bts and in $ terms within 2 months.

The market can be seen http://cryptofresh.com/a/CONSTRUCTION_USD

Anyone who donates and changes his mind, I will buy back within 1 month at the same price. Those who donate and do not expect anything will see the rewards of trust. Having said that I want to stress again that there are no strings attached from my behalf and this should be considered a donation.

Thank you for the interest!

 

That is the spirit!! If everyone could follow your example bts would be worth x20 more than what it is..

@kenCode no idea what you just said..lol..

The reason I am asking is because I find it unbelievable that people and corporations continue to share private data via dropbox and wetransfer etc after all these hacks..It would make much more sense to be able to do this in a decentralized, more private way and cryptocurrencies can also give the right incentive as well by obliging people that want to use this to buy the underlying token. I am sure that this can be done with graphene but i was wondering whether someone will do this from the graphene or bitshares team or whether someone else will do it before using ethereum or something else..

wow..thanks @JonnyBitcoin

I guess now we will soon start OTC trades with escrow to avoid OL fees..lol..

I wanted to bump this and let you know what I intend to do in order to be fair and be able to meet my promises.

2 months ago someone donated 100,000 bts in exchange for 2,000 construction tokens. at this time bts was worth $0.004. That implied a usd price for each construction token of 0.2 bitusd. In order for me to be able to keep track and be able to buy back at a better price those who decide to donate in the construction token I have decided to put the remaining 8,000 construction tokens for sale at $0.2 price and not in terms of bts price. You can see the new market pair in the below:

https://bitshares.openledger.info/market/CONSTRUCTION_USD

I would like to stress again that this is a donation token. So there are no guarantees of any return to anyone willing to donate.

Having said that my intention is that anyone who donates and then changes his mind at any time, can send me a PM and within a month notice I will buy back the token at the min price paid of bitusd $0.2. Those who donate and do not change their mind most probably will have some nice surprises if they do trust me.

Thank you very much. Your support is very much appreciated!

 @fav if I knew how I would have done so

@mr-whitekey don't talk to me about enthusiasms. I am here way before you, I have shared the enthusiasm of all kind of stupid deals here,I even sold my car a couple o years ago when bts market cap was at 20mil because of my enthusiasm to buy more..

@tbone . NEM is not diluting is fixed supply and is at 85 mil market cap.the same market cap that bts had before changing the supply rules. And yes I think that if there is to be any further development it should not be in the form of worker proposals who receive lots of pay and do not either bother to update the community of what they do on a weekly basis. No one is updating here of what they do on a weekly basis (@xeroc @svk @vikram). Only @kenCode updates us of his development and he is not getting paid by bts worker proposal but from blockpay token. I would prefer if all devs were paid in the form of their token.in the end of the day if you want bts to succeed everyone should help and do what he knows to do without requesting payment.We thought that this does not make sense,that bts workers will attract a lot of devs,that bts will not stay behind competition and none of these happened... All in all I think someone should fork and create bts3 in fixed supply and sharedrop.

@Frodo I agree with you that dilution is not a problem but we need a new perspective. Deflationary token that the supply is always decreased and devs that are willing to do the extra mile without payment.their work will be rewarded by holding the token they support with their dev work. Also we definitely need that new website. Forget about bts1 is history...

Solcert or Solomon and nonsense as my friend @tonyk used to call it does not look very promising either.. I hope that does not end up being a scam but...no updates from @SolomonSollarsNSense for a while does not look good..I remember back in the days I decided to through some bts to solcert instead of peerplays..how stupid was that??

@Yao  excellent man! I knew that this was a good ides despite what my friend @fav thinks.. Make sure that you explain them that they can also short bitassets such as bitbtc..