Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mf-tzo

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 115
106
Random Discussion / Re: "Construction" token donation
« on: March 15, 2017, 09:54:04 pm »
[member=36434]Permie[/member] thank you for your good words..

The idea of Construction was indeed a real world application but unfortunately the community didn't see much value in this..Out of the $10,000 max amount to raise with min target $1,000 I have raised the incredibly amount of $25 from one person who I returned to him $30 for his trust (if I remember correctly). Since then the token is no longer for real application but only donation (such as Brownies.PTS) with no obligation from my side what so ever.

Since it was launched as a donation token, 2,000 construction have been sold for 100,000 bts. Yesterday I bought them back for 110,000 bts so those who bought them made a 10% profit in bts and in $ terms within 2 months.

The market can be seen http://cryptofresh.com/a/CONSTRUCTION_USD

Anyone who donates and changes his mind, I will buy back within 1 month at the same price. Those who donate and do not expect anything will see the rewards of trust. Having said that I want to stress again that there are no strings attached from my behalf and this should be considered a donation.

Thank you for the interest! :)

 

107
[member=32206]SolomonSollarsNSense[/member] I am sorry if offended you but I don't even remember since when it was when you raised funds with Solcert ICO and all I hear from you is "the time is now" within 1-2 months etc etc and all this reminds me Muse..We all know how great this has developed..

In addition I remember well that at he time of donation I have donated more than 0.5 btc equivalent and now my solcerts are worth less than 0.1 btc, if they even worth that, and I was from the early birds that donated in the small tiers..I think that I am -5 times in btc terms and -3 in $ terms but anyway..

Since then there is absolutely no value to solcert token.There is no trading activity whatsoever, no updates and you don't seem to realize that all these are problems..No you are talking about Dash, about 2nd round of ICO in the wide crypto community without even bothering to explain if holders of Solcert will have any benefit what so ever compared to the tokens of the 2nd ICO round..If all this doesn't look scam then what is?

Anyway...I am not going to argue with you and maybe I shouldn't have accused you of scam since indeed time will tell. Anyone can make his investment decisions so I blame mostly myself for having invested in Solcert vs.Peerplays.. 

108
General Discussion / Re: locked 84M BTS
« on: March 14, 2017, 09:40:37 pm »
That is the spirit!! +5% +5% If everyone could follow your example bts would be worth x20 more than what it is..

109
Random Discussion / Re: "Construction" token donation
« on: March 14, 2017, 09:30:37 pm »
Now that bts price recovered to the $ price that someone donated to CONSTRUCTION I put an order to buyback the 2,000 CONSTRUCTION at 55bts.
In other words someone made a 10% profit in bts and in $ terms within 2 months. Thank you for your support!

http://cryptofresh.com/a/CONSTRUCTION_BTS

Since now I can payback with the 10% return to those who donated and in order to keep more simple the way I reward people willing to support me and trust my trading, I put an order to sell the remaining 8,000 CONSTRUCTION at $1

http://cryptofresh.com/a/CONSTRUCTION_USD

Whoever donates and changes his mind can give me a month notice and I will buy back at the same price. Those who donate and do not change their mind will enjoy the rewards of trust!

Thank you for your support!  :)


110
General Discussion / Re: transfer data with graphene tech
« on: March 12, 2017, 03:16:55 pm »
[member=30868]kenCode[/member] no idea what you just said..lol..

The reason I am asking is because I find it unbelievable that people and corporations continue to share private data via dropbox and wetransfer etc after all these hacks..It would make much more sense to be able to do this in a decentralized, more private way and cryptocurrencies can also give the right incentive as well by obliging people that want to use this to buy the underlying token. I am sure that this can be done with graphene but i was wondering whether someone will do this from the graphene or bitshares team or whether someone else will do it before using ethereum or something else..

111
General Discussion / transfer data with graphene tech
« on: March 12, 2017, 01:02:54 pm »
I was wondering if it would be possible to use graphene tech to use cryptography and transfer privately data from one to another.  In other words replace dropbox, wetransfer, sugarsynch etc with something decentralized and private? [member=5]bytemaster[/member] [member=6]Stan[/member] [member=120]xeroc[/member] [member=30868]kenCode[/member]

112
General Discussion / Re: Blockpay transaction fee
« on: March 06, 2017, 08:48:02 pm »
wow..thanks [member=37127]JonnyBitcoin[/member]

I guess now we will soon start OTC trades with escrow to avoid OL fees..lol..

113
General Discussion / Blockpay transaction fee
« on: March 06, 2017, 07:18:02 pm »
The other day I put an order to buy 2,730 Blockpay for 101,000 bts and I ended up paying 101,000 for 2,675 Blockpay i.e. I paid a transaction fee of 55 Blockpays..wtf... :(...why? why? why? Anyone knows why? I paid a fee in bts terms at that time of 2,035 bts instead of 0.14bts as usually..

the order:
http://cryptofresh.com/tx/6df6a326e1d4cc37d9f29f390e716f7e8d9d3894

the fill order:
http://cryptofresh.com/tx/50ebc981be633bd0450d9a6020b7e2dbbd6b2684

and if you see my account I have only 2,675 Blockpay

 :(

114
Random Discussion / Re: "Construction" token donation
« on: March 06, 2017, 07:08:13 pm »
I wanted to bump this and let you know what I intend to do in order to be fair and be able to meet my promises.

2 months ago someone donated 100,000 bts in exchange for 2,000 construction tokens. at this time bts was worth $0.004. That implied a usd price for each construction token of 0.2 bitusd. In order for me to be able to keep track and be able to buy back at a better price those who decide to donate in the construction token I have decided to put the remaining 8,000 construction tokens for sale at $0.2 price and not in terms of bts price. You can see the new market pair in the below:

https://bitshares.openledger.info/market/CONSTRUCTION_USD

I would like to stress again that this is a donation token. So there are no guarantees of any return to anyone willing to donate.

Having said that my intention is that anyone who donates and then changes his mind at any time, can send me a PM and within a month notice I will buy back the token at the min price paid of bitusd $0.2. Those who donate and do not change their mind most probably will have some nice surprises if they do trust me. :)

Thank you very much. Your support is very much appreciated!

115
[member=31]fav[/member] good to know he is active there.maybe someone should tell him that it is important to be active in this forum as well.

[member=39182]tbone[/member] I do not expect all projects to work but projects that don't work out as planed and do not compensate or at least make an effort to compensate the investors are scams..They should have at least the dignity to say they failed and not keep in the dark.

By the way..donating in my CONSTRUCTION token you guys have more probability receive a good return.at least I am honest and do not bullshit other people.

116
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 05, 2017, 12:18:40 pm »
 [member=31]fav[/member] if I knew how I would have done so

[member=42459]mr-whitekey[/member] don't talk to me about enthusiasms. I am here way before you, I have shared the enthusiasm of all kind of stupid deals here,I even sold my car a couple o years ago when bts market cap was at 20mil because of my enthusiasm to buy more..

[member=39182]tbone[/member] . NEM is not diluting is fixed supply and is at 85 mil market cap.the same market cap that bts had before changing the supply rules. And yes I think that if there is to be any further development it should not be in the form of worker proposals who receive lots of pay and do not either bother to update the community of what they do on a weekly basis. No one is updating here of what they do on a weekly basis ([member=120]xeroc[/member] [member=11456]svk[/member] [member=4854]vikram[/member]). Only [member=30868]kenCode[/member] updates us of his development and he is not getting paid by bts worker proposal but from blockpay token. I would prefer if all devs were paid in the form of their token.in the end of the day if you want bts to succeed everyone should help and do what he knows to do without requesting payment.We thought that this does not make sense,that bts workers will attract a lot of devs,that bts will not stay behind competition and none of these happened... All in all I think someone should fork and create bts3 in fixed supply and sharedrop.

[member=12821]Frodo[/member] I agree with you that dilution is not a problem but we need a new perspective. Deflationary token that the supply is always decreased and devs that are willing to do the extra mile without payment.their work will be rewarded by holding the token they support with their dev work. Also we definitely need that new website. Forget about bts1 is history...

117
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 04, 2017, 07:46:16 pm »
[member=30868]kenCode[/member] is the last chance of bts to succeed together with a coordinated marketing. And more specifically stealth IMHO..if that fails then..

By the way. Seeing bts bleeding and bleeding I am starting to think that maybe someone should fork bts,go back to fixed supply of 2billion which is reduced constantly by burning supply from fees.essentially go back to bts1 but rename it bts3 and sharedrop to bts holders excluding exchanges and let the market decide of that value. apparently cryptoinvestors want deflationary tokens not inflationary and this should be obvious to everyone in this community after 3 years of bleeding. What do u guys think?

118
Solcert or Solomon and nonsense as my friend [member=11011]tonyk[/member] used to call it does not look very promising either.. I hope that does not end up being a scam but...no updates from [member=32206]SolomonSollarsNSense[/member] for a while does not look good..I remember back in the days I decided to through some bts to solcert instead of peerplays..how stupid was that??

119
General Discussion / Re: how about to raise block reward?
« on: February 21, 2017, 01:38:07 pm »
I am sure now the service will be improved...lol..If nothing changes to the service provided and feeds are wrong again I hope that you guys consider to go back to the 1.5bts and fire some bad witnesses..

120
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Advertisement at 8btc
« on: February 15, 2017, 07:15:13 pm »
[member=2134]Yao[/member]  excellent man! I knew that this was a good ides despite what my friend [member=31]fav[/member] thinks.. Make sure that you explain them that they can also short bitassets such as bitbtc.. :)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 115