Quote from: MrJeans on December 31, 2017, 07:04:37 am

Quote from: Musewhale on October 24, 2017, 01:23:25 am

1.  The number of MUSE decreased to 1% of the original
2.  https://openledger.io/market/OPEN.MUSEOL_BTS
     https://market.rudex.org/#/market/RUDEX.MUSE_BTS
3.  Please continue to pay attention, I think the breakthrough will appear in 2018
4.  Of course, I'd rather you sell MUSE, because I want to buy something cheap

How do I convert from OPEN.MUSE to OPEN.MUSEOL?
I've been holding OPENMUSE and see I can convert to OPEN.MUSE but not to OPEN.MUSEOL.
So dont see how I can trade.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Also I have not yet claimed any NOTES/MUSE from angelshares/protoshares etc.
How would I go about claiming this.

1. Investors holding OPEN.MUSE will automatically receive a corresponding share of OPEN.MUSEOL, and do not need to do anything
2. With OPENMUSE investors, I don't know if I can receive the corresponding OPEN.MUSEOL automatically. I suggest that you contact openledger actively.
3. You can use the private key of PTS+AGS to directly claim your MUSE

Thank you for your response.
I have filed a support ticket regarding the matter with Openledger.

Something GChicken said on another thread today:

Quote from: GChicken on October 18, 2016, 10:14:41 am

I honestly see Bitshares as a combination of killer features (scale-ability, speed, governance, flexibility, MPAs(Market Pegged Assets), UIAs(User Issued Assets), Stable-coins, prediction markets) in a world where its competitors individually can only compete on one or two items. But the rest of the world doesn't share my opinion through lack of visibility, education and maybe a marketing issue. i know personally when i get someone to actually try the platform they are blown away, this is not your run of the mill cloned bitcoin wallet; they maybe a little set back at first as it can be a lot to take in, but in general the recognise the functionality and point of differance.

Do y'all  think Bitshares might benefit from a little brand segregation? Nothing about the project needs to fundamentally change and I am not suggesting that we rebrand the core project, but would we make more headway if niche features were represented as new and novel on a new website with a new brand? Obviously it would take a team to implement, but I am thinking a bitshares version of Augur. Augur is built on ethereum, but maintains its own identity. The Bitshares prediction market is built into Bitshares we just need a unique name and a site dedicated just to it, kinda like Openledger does for the exchange aspects. I understand OL has an interface with the prediction market, but let's be honest...  This way we can be clear and focused in our promotion of the platform. Go here for a DEX and here for a decentralized prediction market kinda thing.

Also at the moment the prediction market allows the market creator to decide who wins, may I respectfully say I like Augur's solution much more... we kinda need to address that.

A great opportunity for a keen entrepreneur to jump on 
The projects are opensource and very free. If you see an opportunity, go for it. The space is still very new so there are many opportunities. It wont be like that forever.

welcome aboard.

Here is a thread where people are mentioning some of the issues we are having:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,23355.0.html

Works now, thanks a lot

When cloning the github and running the client on a local host:
The client is very slow in general
The exchange is non functional (just shows as loading continuously).

Tried connecting to different servers.
Is there any way to fix this so that testing can be done locally.

I believe there was a budget document/page published somewhere about what was funded, donations received, VC received etc.
Struggling to find this.

I am looking to use it to try and work out a tangible value for the work completed thus far.

Coming back to this.
I see that the 'reserve' function allows you to manually destroy some of your UIA.
However would it be possible to set up your UIA so that the fee charged for the trade of the UIA is automatically burned.

So the fee would not be transferred to the account who created the UIA but would simply be destroyed.

If such a feature does not exist, would it be possible for such a feature to be coded into Bitshares in the future? It would be a much cleaner way to implement fees under certain circumstances.

Quote

bridge where people can buy bitCNY or bitUSD

You don't need a bridge for that ... it's a pair in the dex that only needs some liquidity

I mean a something where you can send money from your WeChat or Alipay account to another WeChat or Alipay account (with say your bitshares account name as a memo) and it will credit your bitshares account.

This would allow for easy on boarding in China as almost everyone has funds in WeChat.

It shouldnt be difficult to implement but I believe there are regulations making this difficult.