Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Chronos

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 31
46
General Discussion / Re: Bots
« on: January 08, 2017, 04:28:52 am »
Um, bots don't make assets worthless. If the price goes to 0, maybe it's a worthless asset anyway, bots or not.

Study an asset carefully before you buy it, to see what underlying value it may have.

47
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 05, 2017, 07:57:01 pm »
It was @xeroc, I believe. I'd also be interested in the opinion of @JonnyBitcoin.

48
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 05, 2017, 06:49:50 pm »
How about this new saying: "The future of Bitshares looks brighter than the previous future of Bitshares actually was!"

49
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 05, 2017, 06:14:57 pm »
I think I understand.  :o

So I'm of the opinion that the Squeeze Protection Price (SQPR) be set to 500% so that margin call orders are executed against the entire order book. Scary for the shorts, but avoids a black swan. Watch your collateral.

I like keeping a low maintenance collateral ratio (MCR) in order to allow a higher degree of leverage, if desired.

50
General Discussion / Re: Voting with collateral BTS
« on: January 05, 2017, 06:11:24 pm »
As it should be. Very good, thanks.

51
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 05, 2017, 05:55:07 am »
Wait, maybe I'm confused. What is MSSR and what is MCR? I thought I was recommending to allow margin liquidations to walk the entire order book instead of get stuck (as in the OP screenshot).

52
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 05, 2017, 02:43:23 am »
True. But you aren't reducing your leverage ratio if your short is about to be called. It's already changed due to the market move. You're simply maintaining your leverage to compensate for loss of value in underlying asset.

You make good points, though. Especially when you say that BTS lacks incentives for shorts.

53
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 05, 2017, 12:03:44 am »
Well, I've never held a large short position in a smartcoin, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. I still think a low MSSR (which causes margin call orders to sit on the book, as in this market today) is just a crutch for shorts, at the expense of market stability. IMO, it should be a huge number instead, because shorts can always add collateral if they are paying attention.

I could be wrong. Would you like me to short some BTWTY and have a taste of my own medicine?  :)

54
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: January 04, 2017, 09:58:44 pm »
Financial tips are dangerous, because what works for me may not work for you.
I always think of your name "yvv" as "YMMV" or "Your Mileage May Vary." Sounds like you would agree with this imaginary username.  :)

55
General Discussion / Re: Brainstorm - Bit20 MSSR / margin call
« on: January 04, 2017, 09:54:24 pm »
My opinion? Shorts need to watch their collateral ratios. Set it to 500% MSSR to keep the market liquid and safe for all!

56
General Discussion / Voting with collateral BTS
« on: January 04, 2017, 09:52:06 pm »
Can you vote for committee/worker/witness with BTS that's tied up in a collateral position?

57
Meta / Re: Subforum consolidation
« on: January 04, 2017, 07:45:16 pm »
Yeah, we don't need "Bitshares 2.0" now that it's the only Bitshares that is Bitshares. Good plans all around.

58
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BitShares Proxies: Proposals 2017
« on: January 04, 2017, 06:53:30 pm »
Great questions. As a Bitshares proxy, it's important to be active in the leadership of the direction of the network. Looking forward to responses from our voting proxies. The top proxies are listed here: http://cryptofresh.com/ballots

59
Random Discussion / Musings of a Bitcoiner: A Bonding Experience
« on: December 31, 2016, 07:20:00 pm »
Listen to this eposide at: https://youtu.be/f0sv6jpsKOM. Transcript below.



Bitcoin really strengthens communities, bringing people together with a common, bonding experience. That’s because bitcoiners literally do have a common, bonding experience. We even have a name for it: it’s called getting scammed.

Put simply, there are basically two kinds of bitcoiners: those who have been scammed, and those who will be scammed. You might think that there is a third kind, the scammer, but you’re wrong. Scammers get scammed, too. In fact, one scammer was busy being scammed, while he scammed me! I would diagram it for you, but it would just look like a bunch of lines with the word SCAM on them.

To be honest, I’ve only been scammed about 3 times, give or take twice, which isn’t that bad. I’d rather not get into too much detail, but I will tell you this much: OUCH. You probably know exactly how I feel. It’s that feeling of suddenly losing your magic internet money that you never knew you didn’t have. You can’t even watch it go, because of the magic. You just open up your magic internet wallet, aaaand it’s gone.

I heard of one bitcoiner who took a photo of his paper wallet, and then compressed the photo and password-protected it, and then he chiseled the hexadecimal representation of that file into a chunk of steel and buried it in his backyard. Ok, ok, I was just kidding about that last part. He actually kept the file on his computer. Then he installed a virus. That might have been his mistake, aaaand it’s gone.

The most famous scam in the history of bitcoin would probably be the Mt Gox scandal. Mt Gox (or M.T. Gox, also known as “Empty Gox”) was a bitcoin exchange that suddenly announced that they couldn’t find anyone’s magic internet money. In true scammer form, they claimed that they weren’t really scamming anyone, because they were too busy being scammed by something they called Transaction Malleability. I think that means their cat stole it.

Some people think that bitcoin itself is a scam, or that its only reason for existence is to scam people, but that’s not true at all. Let me explain by analogy. Imagine, if you will, that bitcoin is like a car. Now, you must admit: criminals use cars. See? Now that’s what I call a solid proof.

Of course, if cars were truly like bitcoin, then they would take a random amount of fuel to get anywhere. They would only start about once every 10 minutes, but you might not be inside when they do. Oh, and you should probably not drive where anyone can see you, because one day, you’ll suddenly notice that your car is a different color, and your keys won’t unlock the doors anymore.

Fortunately, bitcoin isn’t really like a car. It’s more like a club. But if you want to join, watch out. You’re going to get scammed. Welcome to the club.

60
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares 3.0 - It Is Time
« on: December 28, 2016, 04:56:20 pm »
I've put some thought into a bitcoin sidechain peg. One major challenge: it turns Bitshares into a high-trust environment. Here's why:

1) We create the two-way peg
2) Various users transfer a large amount, for example 25000 BTC, onto the BTS chain
3) Those bitcoins are held in the BTC chain, controlled by Bitshares witnesses in case of "withdrawal request"
4) This creates a huge bounty for witnesses to go rogue and steal the bitcoins.

Any large-enough group of witnesses could claim to be hacked and steal all the sidechained bitcoins. This isn't possible on the network today, I mean, witnesses can't steal your BTS. Using this would be very scary for me, just because I'm trusting that 20 or 30 people won't be tempted to steal 25 million dollars that they collectively control.

Another potential attack: a majority-by-votes BTS holder can vote in new witnesses for himself. Before, it was scary enough, as he could mess with our blockchain somewhat, with double-spends, etc. But with this sidechain, now he can steal all the bitcoins.

Thoughts?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 31