Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sschiessl

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 45
181
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: August 19, 2019, 08:29:47 pm »
Bilingual quote from Annemieke

Quote
Update on Wirex
Wirex 进展通告

As of today, we have a good working relationship with Wirex. After our initial application, it took longer than expected on their side to formally process, as they were themselves fully occupied with their intended large expansion in South East Asia (see https://wirexapp.com).

时至今日,我们一直与 Wirex 保持着非常良好的合作关系。当我们第一次向 Wirex 提交申请后,Wirex 用了比预期更久的时间来正式处理这份申请,原因是当时他们正忙于在东南亚扩张市场的计划 (详见 https://wirexapp.com)。

The application was judged positive and resulted in a massive document for the official on-boarding. This involves; legal proof of all connected entities and persons: Me, the Bitshares Blockchain Foundation, Blockchain Projects BV, the contracts involved in between, tax filings and legislative issues on all, situations and facts around websites involved in BTS, their contracts with parties involved, responsible roles, Ultimate Beneficiaries of them all, involved trading exchanges on BTS and much, much more.

最终,我们的申请得到了正面反馈,而接下来我们需要向 Wirex 提供大量的文件来确保 BTS 可以正式上线。我们需要提供的文件包括:所有相关实体和个人的法律证明(我本人、比特股基金会(BBF)、Blockchain Projects BV 公司)、所有的相关合同、税务申报及法律问题、所有涉及到 BTS 的网站信息及现况、所有与相关方的合作合同、责任方、最终受益人、BTS 涉及的交易所等等,以及很多很多其他的事项。

This is serious preparation work to get it all complete prior to sending to the lawyers. We try to be as complete and effective as possible before their UK and German lawyers go over all the information.

这是一项需要非常认真准备的工作,在交给律师前,我们需要确保把所有文件都准备好。在 Wirex 英国和德国的律师审核所有信息之前,我们尽可能高效、准时地提交完整的文件。

Please bear in mind this is not a listing on an exchange. It is a debit card. This involves high regulatory demand all over the world. Which I personally not only understand, but  am very much in favour of. It adds to the BTS reputation to handle and get through such a procedure, even though it is a decentralized situation in nature.
 
需要特别注意的是,这不同于在交易所上市。这是借记卡,它需要满足全球高度监管的要求。我本人非常清楚并且赞同这些要求,同时,尽管我们是在去中心化的情况下运作的,我们有处理并通过这些繁杂手续的实力,这对提升 BTS 的名声会有很大的帮助。

The availability of Wirex in Africa and the soon to be available South East Asian region opens up many business opportunities for BTS, BitCNY and new businesses on top of the BitShares Blockchain in a natural organic way. Furthermore, personally, I am looking forward to entering into the mail blasts Wirex does to its customers on a weekly basis. That outreach alone is marketing for BTS we otherwise never would be able to Afford.

Wirex 可以在非洲使用,未来也将在东南亚流通,这将为 BTS、BitCNY 和其他在 BitShares 区块链上的新兴项目提供更多新的业务机会。同时,我本人非常期待 BTS 被列入 Wirex 每周给客户的群发邮件中,这对 BTS 来说是一个很好的营销机会,这也是我们仅凭一己之力很难实现的。

In short, even during the holidays, we are at it. But this not a small “thingy “ to be dealt with in an email or two or a simple doc we can sign and be done with. It is heavy due diligence, not alone on us, but all we are involved with. We are confident we will complete it all. It is just work to be handled.

简单来说,这个工作量不小,不是发一两封邮件或者签署一份简单的文档就能解决的事情。因此,即使是在假期,我们也在马不停蹄地跟进这件事。这是一项繁重的尽职调查,这不仅仅关系到我们自己,还关系到 BTS 相关的所有人,我们有信心一定能顺利完成。只是我们还需要时间来完成这些工作量。

Hope this clarifies the duration of the process!
希望这个帖子能够让大家理解这个过程所需要的时间。

Best Regards, Annemieke
Annemieke 敬上

182
I will check why the frontend does not say insufficient balance

183
We will need more information to help you. I was connected to one of the bitshares.ws nodes and it worked fine.

Can you please tell us what node yoi are connected to and what the browser console log it?

Try connecting to the testnet as well to play around

184
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares Marketing Group
« on: August 16, 2019, 03:36:54 pm »
Thanks!

185
It doesn't load for me.. Can you upload it somewhere else please? I saw some bits of text, this is some kind of HTLC proposal?

186
Please retry connecting to a different node. Do you remember which node you have been connected to?

188
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: bitcrab - make the ecosystem grow
« on: August 13, 2019, 05:04:32 am »
voted refund400K.

it's time to control the inflation of BTS.

As of right now only reference faucet and infrastructure worker are active.

I don't know if that is intended, but that means ALL our conference workers (among other also important workers) are halted. This will cause a major setback in the motivation of the involved people  (and any downpayments would be down the drain as well)
  • 201907-steemfest
  • NABTS2019
  • 2019-06-decentralized-partnership

Is that really the intention of this action? Please do re-consider if this is the best time to choke those efforts.

189
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] BSIP59:Reduce MCR of bitUSD to 1.5
« on: August 08, 2019, 07:54:04 am »
Support on basis of https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28823.0, and settings of other crypto-collaterized stablecoins.

190
OpenLedger displays unknown assets and namespaces as "unknown.XXX". Use your own fork and deploy the BitShares UI. Or try wallet.bitshares.org

191
General Discussion / Re: Allow non-LTM accounts to be referrers?
« on: August 05, 2019, 09:39:45 am »
How about we add somewhere on the website a text a la:

"Want to refer users to BitShares on a commercial basis? Contact marketing@bitshares.org and we will help you set up with what you need!"

I have no problem buying interested webmasters an LTM (after evaluating their inquiry), either through marketing worker or reference faucet worker.

192
In what way/form could I give feedback on the paper?

193
Can you post a summary of this worker in here as well please? If possible with links and references of media and social media coverage
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15

I am confused by the way you have setup the table there. You mention incoming and outgoing payments, and I can't identify where this workers own budget comes in. My questions:
  • How much funds have been collected through this worker?
  • Where are those funds shown in the table of https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15?
  • Is there anything left over that will be returned?
  • Can you please clarify what "market fee for huodongxing" and "safeguard service" is?

Please summarize and finalize this worker before tapping into funds of another worker.

I think you misunderstood something. The table in your link was for 1st Devcon, which was not covered by a worker. The accounting for 2nd Devcon, which is covered by this worker, will be reported for sure, just give them some time to relax. They need some time to summarize income/outcome, follow up all media, pay bills, etc.. I assume they will finish everything within a month after Devcon.

Yes I did misunderstand this. I would otherwise not ask for accounting details that quickly, I thought that this was connected to the Greater China worker. Thank you for clarification in that matter.

194
Before talking about this worker, please wrap up the DevCon worker by itself. It is not clear how this deficit came to be since the funds of the DevCon worker are not accounted for, or at least I don't understand how yet.

Now on this worker:
It is a good example of reporting and escrow intent gone wrong.

There is no public information available how much funds have been spent on what. Just looking on the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out, which exceeds the asked for budget. This has been done with no clarification on the increased spendings whatsoever, or even reporting what the money has been spent on. On top of that, the escrow that was publicly communicated was only for show. The worker owner still had access to the owner key of the escrow account, and made use of it.

I don't see at the moment how funds of this worker can be re-used without calling a vote of the community. If funds are to be returned, return it by burning and not to committee.

I feel there is some misunderstanding, the above account table is for the 1st DevCon in 2018, there is no worker for it, there is a worker for the 2rd DevCon in 2019.

Ah, I totally missed the "1st" .... apologies. It does not change the remainder of my comment, in particular the last sentence.
it's not "re-use", it's that the expense was in the plan and already happened however the payment from this worker is not done yet.

Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?

A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?

Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.

195
Before talking about this worker, please wrap up the DevCon worker by itself. It is not clear how this deficit came to be since the funds of the DevCon worker are not accounted for, or at least I don't understand how yet.

Now on this worker:
It is a good example of reporting and escrow intent gone wrong.

There is no public information available how much funds have been spent on what. Just looking on the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out, which exceeds the asked for budget. This has been done with no clarification on the increased spendings whatsoever, or even reporting what the money has been spent on. On top of that, the escrow that was publicly communicated was only for show. The worker owner still had access to the owner key of the escrow account, and made use of it.

I don't see at the moment how funds of this worker can be re-used without calling a vote of the community. If funds are to be returned, return it by burning and not to committee.

I feel there is some misunderstanding, the above account table is for the 1st DevCon in 2018, there is no worker for it, there is a worker for the 2rd DevCon in 2019.

Ah, I totally missed the "1st" .... apologies. It does not change the remainder of my comment, in particular the last sentence.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 45