271
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: May 11, 2019, 06:23:24 am »Support! But when it available to Asian?
Only Wirex knows that. Jademont might have a better overview over the ongoings in that market.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Only Wirex knows that. Jademont might have a better overview over the ongoings in that market.
272
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [worker]2019 2nd Graphene Blockchain Developer Conference/第二届全球石墨烯区块链开发者大会
« on: May 11, 2019, 06:22:32 am »
Heavy support for this.
Personal networking is heavily underrated in our otherwise digital world!
Personal networking is heavily underrated in our otherwise digital world!
273
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Candidate] bitspark-delegate, Bitspark / Sparkdex Representitive
« on: May 11, 2019, 05:52:59 am »
You got my support as well. I'm happy to see you as a business built on BitShares stepping into that role.
274
General Discussion / Re: Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01
« on: May 10, 2019, 06:44:52 pm »
I would suggest to evaluate the very recent setting change and not rush further immediate
275
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: May 10, 2019, 06:43:14 pm »If we go ahead with this WP, will subsequent integrations (bitUSD, bitEUR, ..) cost just as much? Or do you think we can get a discount? Got my card in the mail 👌
I'm afraid your guess is as good as anyone's because there are still too many unknowns for that.
276
General Discussion / Re: Someone is scaming by launching a proposal
« on: May 10, 2019, 04:36:56 am »
Added
277
General Discussion / Re: [Announcement]Change of MCR from 1.75 to 1.6 for bitUSD
« on: May 09, 2019, 07:24:13 am »
This highlights for me the need to specify in the BSIP the rules for acceptance / rejection similar to what has been done for BSIP-42
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0042.md#constant-voting-evaluation
Those BSIP would not be constantly evaluated as they reflect a one time decision, but rules for acceptance / rejection are clearly necessary.
Current voting state:
YES 363,854,977 (53,05% of given votes)
NO 321,904,221 (46,94% of given votes)
Brexit had less of a difference xD. Personally, I would consider this BSIP as accepted.
https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0042.md#constant-voting-evaluation
Those BSIP would not be constantly evaluated as they reflect a one time decision, but rules for acceptance / rejection are clearly necessary.
Current voting state:
YES 363,854,977 (53,05% of given votes)
NO 321,904,221 (46,94% of given votes)
Brexit had less of a difference xD. Personally, I would consider this BSIP as accepted.
278
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 09, 2019, 07:13:01 am »bangzi 0.3372 clockwork 0.3399 roelandp 0.3402 fox 0.3453 zapata42-witness 0.3462 delegate-1.lafona0.3475
The price offered by these witnesses is far below the real price
Please provide a proper overview of market conditions at the time of your posting. Without that, your numbers are meaningless.
279
General Discussion / Re: WARNING: workers.bitshares.foundation
« on: May 07, 2019, 11:36:37 am »
I've checked the account, the last trade was roughly 50k bitCNY for an average price of 2.84 CNY / BTS.
Can you elaborate? Do you mean the market was too thin to buy that much? I did not see a dent in the order book. I assume bitCNY were bought to payout incoming invoices.
Can you elaborate? Do you mean the market was too thin to buy that much? I did not see a dent in the order book. I assume bitCNY were bought to payout incoming invoices.
280
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] zbbtsbp
« on: May 06, 2019, 09:20:40 am »
Hello ZB,
and welcome as a new witness candidate!
Do you have a testnet witness already deployed?
and welcome as a new witness candidate!
Do you have a testnet witness already deployed?
281
Technical Support / Re: Diposit Bitusd at exchange
« on: May 04, 2019, 02:07:08 pm »
I'm afraid you are talking about bitUSD as a token on Ethereum, which is a scam. Only entity that has ethereum gateway I know is OpenLedger, you may ask them.
282
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: May 03, 2019, 06:43:57 am »can you provide the information about:
1. how many money did other community like Bitcoin Litecoin, dai etc pay for the listing?
For all cases I could find that information is locked down with NDAs.
2. how many real users did people use Bitcoin in wirex? LItecoin? Dai?
because I just searched that users need to pay 3% fees when use crypto current desposit fund. I doubt this could be accept by most people.
We are working some numbers for that, and will publish them as soon as we have any.
283
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker] Integration of BTS with Wirex
« on: May 03, 2019, 05:39:58 am »Only BTS will be listed or also include bitCNY/bitUSD/bitEUR/etc?
This proposal is only for listing of BTS, which is equivalent to a regulatory endorsement IMO and will be more than beneficial for any other asset to be listed (personal guess and no promise).
In general, Wirex is not opposed to (crypto-collaterized) stable coins, see DAI and Stellar support.
284
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 02, 2019, 07:14:52 am »
And here it is, thanks for your consideration!
https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration-cn
https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration-cn
285
中文 (Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 01, 2019, 03:56:05 pm »Hello dear bitProfessor, and team behind cn-vote,
I was wondering if you have any feedback or opinion on the Wirex worker?
https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2019-05-wirex-integration
This worker is also being translated, and will be posted as soon as possible. Sorry for posting in englisch.
Would you like to provide a Chinese version for discussion?
Chinese version is expected for tomorrow
