Hi all, proposal raised against smartcoin-committee for listing fee for IDCM. Listing agreement has been modified/agreed with BBF and IDCM ready for signature. No funds will be released to IDCM until listing agreement is signed by them.

Committee members have been contacted individually and provided with details.

If anyone wants to ask me anything just get in touch on telegram @matle85.

Thanks.

Originally, bitRUB was supposed to be the on-chain counterpart for RUB. bitRUB was globally settled soon after the chain started. Since there was no way to revive it back then, someone created bitRUBLE as a replacement.

Now that bitRUB has been revived we have two bitassets for bitRUBLE, which is unfortunate of course. It's up to the users which asset they use, and up to the feed producers which asset(s) they feed.

Really BitRUBLE should not have been created.

Anyway now there are two I agree that the parameters should be the same. People can then decide which to use. Really it should be BitRUB to follow the same nomenclature as elsewhere but either way, important they have the same parameters.

Really sensible suggestion - 100% support.

Very cool!

Quote from: Digital Lucifer on March 21, 2019, 09:44:02 am

I've personally assisted Mathew over the past 2,5 months in assembling correct agreements, proper approach and to not rush during the bitUSD Black Swan. I would appreciate any reasonable explanation for this, since yeah...

- IDCM Listing
- Exrates Listing

these 2 were gold mines. LATOKEN has shitty organization and fake volumes so it wasn't my choice of support at the time, but still... biki ?

Chee®s

guys I appreciate your work, now what I got is:

1.the worker is voted out and now there's only 1.62M BTS left.
2.seems LATOKEN is not a good choice?

so I think you can select CEXs from IDCM, Exrates, and also HotBit  and work on that following the process defined in this thread, make sure the left fund can cover the cost for listing.

Thanks Bitcrab - the agreements are with the Foundation for review in case any changes would be needed before signing.

The remaining fee is sufficient to cover listings and bounties for 2-3 options.

Thule is also reaching out with some of his connections in case there is another good option there we can arrange.

Today has been a good day with UPbit! A really strong exchange and addition for listing BTS

I can get us listed on any of these in the next 3-4 weeks for bitCNY and BTS if we can make arrangements for the account to pay the listing fee:

LATOKEN (number 20)
IDCM (number 25)
HotBit (number 42)
Exrates (number 34)

The above are reasonable/standard level fees with decent offers negotiated considering their ranking (in my view).

I can also get us listed on IDAX (number 8.) but the cost is higher and they were less willing to come down.

I share DLs view some are better than others so am not suggesting we go with all, I just think for sure one of those is just as worthy of listing/bounty as biki

Quote from: matle85 on March 18, 2019, 06:11:08 pm

Quote from: ripplexiaoshan on March 17, 2019, 05:49:31 pm

I have applied 436,406 BTS from smartcoin-marketing for the whole bitCNY&BTS listing work on biki.com. This fund includes the listing fee and bounty reward. Due to NDA with biki.com, the exact number can not be disclosed publicly, but I have shared it within the committee group, and you can estimate it through the total amount.

Other than the listing fee, the rest is used to reward the lobbyists, including @guoan(founder of "BTS 100 cities 100 shops plan", main contributor), gbac(Linda, Jademont, organizer and coordinator). Also, possible transaction fee for providing liquidity at the first month and marketing fee are also included.

By 'applied' do you mean requested? I can't see Biki on CMC.

I have listing options in top 50 but there is no clarity on how funds are applied for. I've messaged Bitcrab but no response.

Please excuse my English.


Here is the summary of my working flow with biki.com:

1\Guoan introduced this exchange to me, I did some basic research about its reputation, trading volume, rank, etc...(one-two weeks)

2\Then we contacted the exchange to get more details, including listing fee and conditions.(one week)

3\ Then we prepared and submitted the application form to the exchange, after the exchange confirmed, I asked for the comments from community and committee. (one week)

4\We then prepared the listing agreement(in English), and then contacted BitShares Foundation (one week)

5\ After the Foundation revised and confirmed the final agreement, get it back to the exchange. (two weeks)

6\ Both the Foundation and exchange signed the agreement.(One week)

7\ Get funded from account "smartcoin-marketing". This account is multisignatured by the committee.(two days)

8\Pay listing fee to the exchange, and help them with technical issues and marketing.(one week)

9\ Announce it to the community

Thanks Ripple. Appreciate you laying it out clearly - can you private message me the address you used for the Committee/Foundation?

I have to admit guys I'm pretty disappointed by this. I arranged listing within a few weeks of this going live and communicated to the Committee the following options:
- IDCM Listing
- Exrates Listing
- Hotbit Listing
- LATOKEN listing


All of these were sent through to the Committee and the Foundation with no response received. All of these are Top 50 and I submitted them for consideration with draft agreements. I don't mind people saying this exchange is not good or that exchange is not good but all of these were willing to list bitCNY, bitUSD and BTS.

What am I doing wrong here? I think I fulfilled the requirements of the worker so I am a bit disappointed a payout has been made for a listing that doesnt meet the stated requirement.

NOTE: Listings are good and I think we need more, I don't know about Biki.com and am not saying it is a rubbish exchange. I am also not saying I wanted listing on all four exchanges I provided I just don't understand what I am meant to do to actually move things forward as it feels like I wasted a lot of time getting these draft agreements just to be ignored.