Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - BTSdac

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 82
31
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTS币龄出租 - 币生币
« on: March 19, 2016, 05:24:47 am »
Quote from: abit on March 18, 2016, 10:43:51 pm
Quote from: BTSdac on March 18, 2016, 02:04:18 am
可以感觉到想不断的为BTS增加权益, 但有点南辕北辙, BTS需要新的功能而不是天天纠结于手续费, 反而增加越来越多的增发.
最近看了一下,worker 增发已经到了每天 25万BTS, 
我曾经发帖说增发很少, 真TM给打自己的脸.  BM给 refund worker 投了反对票, 将增发门槛从需要1.5亿票降低为仅仅需要4000多万票,
不用纠结，再过几天就没反对票了。
每天有25w？我算了下好像是19
Quote from: abit on March 18, 2016, 10:43:51 pm
Quote from: BTSdac on March 18, 2016, 02:04:18 am
可以感觉到想不断的为BTS增加权益, 但有点南辕北辙, BTS需要新的功能而不是天天纠结于手续费, 反而增加越来越多的增发.
最近看了一下,worker 增发已经到了每天 25万BTS, 
我曾经发帖说增发很少, 真TM给打自己的脸.  BM给 refund worker 投了反对票, 将增发门槛从需要1.5亿票降低为仅仅需要4000多万票,
不用纠结，再过几天就没反对票了。
每天有25w？我算了下好像是19
            创建者          每日工资
#1              svk               19,048 BTS
#2          btsnow             60,000 BTS   
#3            abit                  50,000 BTS      
#4           xeroc                10,733 BTS   
#5    roadscape              30,000 BTS   
#6          xeroc                 21,467 BTS   
#7            svk                   25,000 BTS   

加上 每天 4.3万的wintness 工资  总计25.9万每天

32
中文 (Chinese) / Re: BTS币龄出租 - 币生币
« on: March 18, 2016, 02:04:18 am »
可以感觉到想不断的为BTS增加权益, 但有点南辕北辙, BTS需要新的功能而不是天天纠结于手续费, 反而增加越来越多的增发.
最近看了一下,worker 增发已经到了每天 25万BTS, 
我曾经发帖说增发很少, 真TM给打自己的脸.  BM给 refund worker 投了反对票, 将增发门槛从需要1.5亿票降低为仅仅需要4000多万票,



33
General Discussion / I find the root reason of lacking of BTA
« on: March 11, 2016, 01:01:24 pm »
I find the root reason of lacking of BTA
all the BTA is created by loan,  it mean all BTAs are debt by collateral,  there no way to create base currency. 
so alway there is lack bta ?
so I suggest that can destroy BTS to create BTA as base currency.
My proposal:
notice all the price is (BTS/BTA)
1.there are two condition LACK or OVERFLOW  respectively describe BTA is lock and overflow.
   1.1  if feed price is higher than sell price of BTS ,it mean BTA is on LACK
   1.2  if feed price is lower than sell price of BTS ,it mean BTA is on OVERFLOW
2.if BTA is on LACK, BTA can been created by destroying BTS  at 0.995* feed price directly , and the max amount BTS that can been created = all sells that price is lower than feed price .
3.there is a pool of destroyed BTS, all destroyed BTS is go to this poll
4. if BTA is on  OVERFLOW , the BTA holder can directly destroy BTA and get BTS from  pool of destroyed BTS  at the price of 1.005 *feed price.

 

34
General Discussion / Re: BTS need the real useful operation rather than useless adjust
« on: February 22, 2016, 02:41:14 am »
Quote from: xeroc on February 21, 2016, 07:25:50 pm
I disagree ..
Microtransactions are a HUGE selling point .. in particular in combination with smartcoins.

EVERYONE will want that while margind trading and bond markets are only of interest for traders and speculators
yes  Microtransactions are a HUGE selling point
but we can just reduce the transfer fee to  0.1 BTS , it is easy , then  focus on other new operations ,


35
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 一次中外共识投票，欢迎参加
« on: February 21, 2016, 02:36:58 am »
我有非常疯狂的点子，

36
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 动态打开和关闭某个功能是否必要
« on: February 21, 2016, 02:34:54 am »
Quote from: abit on February 19, 2016, 09:59:49 am
不如直接 hard fork 关掉
如果是 fork关闭  意义不大啊

37
General Discussion / BTS need the real useful operation rather than useless adjust
« on: February 20, 2016, 03:48:18 pm »
BTS need the real useful operation rather than useless adjustment 
need real useful operation  like
margin trade
dice
.....
but not develop a operation to make people can transfer bts freely
it is simply just reduce the fee if all we think high is banner of attracting new user, it is easy and simple .
I really don`t understand!

38
General Discussion / Re: Subsidizing Market Liquidity
« on: February 20, 2016, 12:04:12 pm »
Quote from: bytemaster on February 19, 2016, 09:04:16 pm
Assuming we implement this feature in the BTS / USD market and voters approve workers funding this at a rate of 2.5 BTS / sec (50% of allowed dilution) and the internal exchange had $100,000 of daily volume then users trading on the internal exchange would see a 1% more than they would get by trading off chain. If daily volume was $50,000 then they would see a 2% profit over doing the same trades off-chain.
are you crazy?
I don`t understand  why you have this idea, you change the rule of bts2.0, 
BM do you forget the merge that hurt bts so badly?
maybe you want to improve bts using you way , but don`t change the rule first , I also think btser would not agree this idea ?
there are many operation can been done to improve bts
like margin trade
but I think many of btser would reject to force fork !

39
中文 (Chinese) / 动态打开和关闭某个功能是否必要
« on: February 19, 2016, 04:44:04 am »
通过投票，任何功能（不包含基础功能）都可以被动态的打开或者关闭
好处
1.可以关闭一些不能通过监管的功能，
2.关闭对系统有害的功能，
坏处
可以关闭功能

40
General Discussion / Re: is the function of opening and closing a feature needed
« on: February 19, 2016, 04:34:04 am »
Quote from: puppies on February 19, 2016, 03:50:42 am
There is no reason why a wallet needs to allow any specific feature.  I would much rather see different wallets for different markets.  Heavy trading wallets for traders, simple transfer wallets, PM wallets, dice or other casino game wallets such as roulette, slots, or video poker.
trun on/off a featrue is on block chain level rather than wallet  level

41
General Discussion / Re: is the function of opening and closing a feature needed
« on: February 19, 2016, 02:05:48 am »
Quote from: JonnyBitcoin on February 19, 2016, 01:57:29 am
I don't understand what you mean.
it mean transfer can been closing  by shareholder voting

42
General Discussion / is the function of opening and closing a feature needed
« on: February 19, 2016, 01:35:32 am »
the function of opening and closing a feature mean stockholder can vote to open or close a feature (eg. transfer/ market/ dice (if have in future))  like change chain parameter
do you think if this function need ? 
the advantage :
1.can try many feature ( like dice  )on chain and don`t worry that the feature if comply with policy. because the feature can been close if policy change .
2.closing the feature with risk to chain
the disadvantage
1.it is a double-edged sword, because  it can close a feature , lol

43
中文 (Chinese) / Re: xeroc 有话说，他想申请区块链工人
« on: February 18, 2016, 05:34:07 am »
xeroc 的确做了不少工作 ，在网站上就发了10000+帖子 +5%

44
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 分红功能简介
« on: February 17, 2016, 08:02:51 am »
Quote from: sudo on February 17, 2016, 07:33:00 am
分红功能是不是可以用于批量转账省手续费？ 那交易所爽死了
是给股东分红啊，和批量转账没关系

45
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 分红功能简介
« on: February 17, 2016, 07:03:04 am »
Quote from: abit on February 17, 2016, 12:44:00 am
好吧，我提点意见。
个人感觉vector不行，可能根本没必要加从数据库取数据存到vector那一步。速度慢，吃内存。用BTS资产做个分红测试，截个CPU图看看？
我注意到了，
但我先预先申请足够的内存。所以vector和数组效率相当。
性能还可以，我在本地测试的
给1000个账号分红，用时少于1s
给11000个账号分红，用时间大于3s
考虑 A股股东一般在几万左右，
初期的BTS的资产 股东一般在 几百左右，性能够用了

将来如果一个资产真在几万甚至几十万个股东，有两个方便可以改进
1.witness当让需要更好的电脑，
2.执行操作时候采取异步， 先adjust 发分红者的余额，就可以打包交易广播了，然后在慢慢调整股东余额。这样不会影响打包速度。

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 82

Page created in 0.201 seconds with 23 queries.