Code: [Select]

Scanning dependencies of target dev_tests
[ 98%] Building CXX object tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o
/Users/maurits/bitsharesxts/bitshares_toolkit/tests/dev_tests.cpp:3:10: fatal error: 'dev_fixture.hpp' file not found
#include "dev_fixture.hpp"
         ^
1 error generated.
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Same here.

You can comment out the dev_tests in the CMakeLists.txt in the tests folder. Although I think if you pull the latest that fix has already been made.

#add_executable( dev_tests dev_tests.cpp )
#target_link_libraries( dev_tests deterministic_openssl_rand bts_client bts_cli bts_wallet bts_blockchain bts_net bitcoin fc ${BOOST_LIBRARIES} ${OPENSSL_LIBRARIES} ${PLATFORM_SPECIFIC_LIBS} ${crypto_library}  ${rt_library} )

I am bdNoble, the Noble bitShares delegate.

I promise to always act in a way that would do my name justice. I will donate at least 10% of my profits to charity. Also I will not be anonymous. You can can look me up at facebook.com/bdNoble. A website and more updates will follow.

I have an icon too if I can figure out how to post it with an edit.

So how are the first 100 delegates chosen? I know there was talk of a waiting line for alternate delegates to immediately take the place of a fired delegate. What would be the process to get in that line? Is there a minimum amount of stake that one needs to be considered for a delegate position? If an average person like myself has an average computer but a good internet connection (100Mb with pretty much guaranteed 100% up time) would I have a chance at being a delegate?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote from: onceuponatime on March 25, 2014, 03:59:57 am

Quote from: amatoB on March 25, 2014, 03:50:54 am

A minor point: I've seen "bitshares", "BitShares", and "bitShares" in different areas on the forum and website and in the logo. Which capitalization scheme is the optimal one, and should it be used consistently everywhere?

Unfortunately all variants are used on the new website. It would probably be best to choose a standardized version, while still trademarking, registering, domain squatting or whatever needs to be done, all of them.

BitShares is brand (when not part of the logo) 
bitShares is logo... (only when used in the logo)
bitshares refers to individual shares. 

I agree it is confusing.

I think it makes most sense to stick with the branding "bitShares" which matches the logo. You don't see anyone anywhere write IPhone or EBay. Although in this texting/blogging/facebook generation people tend to write things in all lowercase when having casual conversation. To this extent many companies are rebranding to use only lowercase. Check out the newest logos of macy's, jcpenny, and sears. There are also plenty of companies that have been all lowercase for a while: amazon, intel, adidas.

I found a random blog post that mentions this trend directly: http://www.duetsblog.com/2011/04/articles/branding/lower-case-branding-visual-identity/

So ultimately "BitShares" is unnecessary if the logo branding is "bitShares", and "bitshares" should be fine for casual conversation but not in any formal paper or on the main website. When you refer to individual shares I would think you should just say "shares".

Yeah I remember that. I brought it up because www.MasterCoin.org has chosen to launch their Distributed Exchange on the Ides of March. So based on the current competition its worth noting that we should try to get out the MVP sooner than later. I do believe that we ultimately have the better product but the longer we wait the more we start to risk our "First" status.

Typo alert: Actioned should be Auctioned at 5:30