抵押出的BITCNY在支撑整个BITCNY区的交易量，投机属性存在于任何事物，抵押出的bitcny不卖出去，都拿在手里，那抵押出的BITCNY还有什么意义? 还谈什么流通？卖的方式难道也有原罪？ 也不允许？

而你已经扭曲了问题的本质，贴线抵押的多头自然会成为空头的猎物，这是不假，但是请清楚现在贴线抵押的多头基本都是原本抵押率在3的多头，惩罚一直存在，但不是以外盘恶意操控喂价的情况。

另外: 你如何判断出熊市真正通过BITCNY进场的人不多？做过统计？难道bitcny不能用来避险？货币的属性之一难道不是投机？

请你回答  喂价如何避免被外盘操控的问题？如果几个大交易所全部禁止BTS充提？如何来避免这种情况？

另外：我不清楚采用比较法到底碰到了谁的痛处？ 内盘价格+手续费的喂价高，外盘空头自然可以来内盘砸价格，怎么？难道不愿意来？就只允许内盘的多头去给外盘的空头接盘子？

Quote from: bitcrab on January 29, 2016, 01:45:26 pm

as I already stated, in my view, as a DAC, Bitshares' goal is not to make more network money, its task is to provide an advanced, convenient, attractive and cheap platform

Uh huh, and who's gonna pay for that? So, if the POS system sells a 50 cent candy bar, it costs 1 BTS fine, but if the POS system sells a Ferarri, it should only charge 1 BTS for that too? How about a Navy Shipbuilder or Lightrail project? Think outside your firewalls, man.
 
Is nature flat? No. It's dynamic. We need to SCALE from micro to macro and everything in between.
 

Quote from: bitcrab on January 29, 2016, 01:45:26 pm

I know not everyone agree with me, but one fact is that most users are at the same time shareholders, charge more means shareholders need to pay more.

Pay more, get more. Pay nothing and you get a LOT less. Understand?
Have you ever built a successful company in your life, or even one that managed to last for more than 5-10 years? Show us the flaws in BSIP10, please.
 

Quote from: bitcrab on January 29, 2016, 01:45:26 pm

we need a balance to ensure the DAC can sustain itself

Good lord, you're all over the place.
Who's actually voting for you anyway? Be specific.

The dex is not a decentralized exchange without a functioning smartcoin. Trading UIAs is nice but can be done faster and cheaper on poloniex.
We are 4 months in to bts 2.0 and none of the smartcoins are liquid. Something big needs to change.
People keep saying we just need a bridge to smartcoins but nobody will provide that bridge without liquidity
Here are some radical ideas of how to increase liquidity.

- The committee or a worker proposal should use reserve pool funds to create smartcoins and sell them in to the market at feed price plus 10%
- Abandon all smartcoins except BitUSD to drive liquidity to it and then think about adding another smartcoin in a years time.
- Get all gateways to offer the same btcUIA instead of each having their own separate ones. Could be a multisig wallet controlled by committee.
- Get the reserve pool to pay for a bitcoin-BitBTC bridge with guaranteed 2-way liquidity
- Limit trading pairs in the GUI to just USD vs XXX
- Buy an existing exchange like poloniex and migrate its backend over to bitshares.
- Pay some altcoins that are struggling but have big communities to migrate their coins over to bitshares through proof of burn.

Loads of people are going to moan about these ideas but we need to prove a smartcoin works.
The trading volume of USD:BTC over the last 24hrs is actually zero as it is on most days.

Quote from: wallace on January 28, 2016, 03:20:53 pm

yes, because currently I do think lowering the fees is the right way to lead bitshares to success.

but why and how? this hasn't been explained. Business decisions made on assumptions while we already have people working for us because of the referral system and current fee structure.

Is it really worth it send OpenLedger and POS away just because of an assumption? What about other people? [member=37127]JonnyBitcoin[/member] is working on his exchange, there are other projects that we might not be aware of.

We're just going to send them away, because of assumptions? No facts or proof? We're doing this when we've shown signs of growing? After just 2 months? What's happening is actually positive and you want to mess it all up just because of an assumption.

Wow, just wow.