Since I'm here I may as well explain the reasons nobody wants this position:
You're basically a politician and have to spend a LOT of time communicating with shareholders to maintain a positive perception (your previous post is a great example of what I mean). That would be fine if you were getting some sort of compensation but committee members are unpaid positions (as they should be). On top of all that, community members here are viciously overly critical. Not only do they expect you to work for free, but you have to work damn hard at that.
Perhaps I'm wrong and being a committee member will be much easier than an unpaid marketing delegate, but I don't think so.
For now committee seats might be held by individuals, but I think it will eventually be representatives from businesses and eventually representatives from groups of businesses, or institutions. Like we see in bitcoin now with all sorts of alliances, coalitions, foundations etc. Businesses are better suited for the evaluation necessary to be well informed and are by need of profit, properly incentivized.
I would like to see Cryptonomex represented, as well as CCEDK.
Some others I think could make a case, and I'm sure I'm forgetting many,.. perhaps Maker, BeyondBitcoin, Bunker, Lime, BitSaphire, DPoS Hub, Gem, Banx, Identabit, Success Council, FreebieServer, etc.
I'm not saying I support any of these , only that they seem like natural starting points.
I suppose an individual, like Dan, could likely hold a seat for as long as he wanted one. But eventually, most will be businesses.