AMD OpenCL Momentum miner

[JohnD]

I tried to run 0.2 on my 290x but i get only 200-300cpm... any ideas why?

 

Code: [Select]

C:\Temp>clpts_x86-64.exe -u JonDja.gpu -p 1 -t 0 -a 0
*****************************************************************************
** clpts - OpenCL PTS Pool Miner v0.2.2 (ypool.net only)
** by NaN - based on xptMiner by jh00 (clintar's code v1.1)
** If you like this software, please consider sending tips to: opencl.miner@gm
l.com
** PTS:  PajuVUWrcPn5ksCFfrBiWQXvpwtE29dcN2
** BTC:  1AumJ5uzz1nuER7pBA6Bh4gNusaxhN85rc
** Your donations will encourage further optimization and development
**
** press CTRL+C to exit
*****************************************************************************

Vendor of used platform (#2 / 2): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
        Name of device #1 / 1 (deviceID 0): Hawaii


Fee Percentage:  2.50%. To set, use "-d" flag e.g. "-d 3.5" is 3.5% donation

Connected to server usinWARNING: Linking two modules of different target tripl
: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
g x.pushWARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-un
own-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
through(xpt) protocol
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-am
pencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-am
pencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
xpt: Logged in with JonDja.gpu
New block data - height: 54499 tx count: 0


Messages during compilation of program for device 'Hawaii':

LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 162)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 112)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 179)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 169)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 222)
    Unrolled as requested!

collisions/min: 255.0000 Shares total: 0
collisions/min: 247.5000 Shares total: 0


[maddi]

clpts_x86.exe -o ypool.net:10034:8080:8081:8082:8083:8084:8085:8086:8087 -u try.a -p 1 -a 2 -t 0,1,2



this is worked to me... thank you..

another question please. how about another settings like tc ? i? is this possible here? and also how much your profit using 1 280x?

[marcolecorse]

possibl help via TeamViewer ?

[NaN]

hello please help me

i use 3x 280x r9

my bat file config is

clpts_x86.exe -o ypool.net:10034:8080:8081:8082:8083:8084:8085:8086:8087 -u try.a -p 1 -a 1 -t 0,1,2


but the miner always crash.. please help me..

try clpts_x86.exe -u <your-username>.<worker-name> -p <your-password> -t 0,1,2 -a 1
or substitute -t 0,1,2 with -t 0,0,1,1,2,2. furthermore -a 2 instead of -a 1 is worth trying out. Otherwise I need the output of the miner before it crashes.

[NaN]

Hello

Sick

3 R9 290 Sapphire

2800cpm

Test Windows 8.1 64bits Drivers 14.1 SDK 2.9

Help help

Most likely you are using only one card. Please use -t 0,1,2 or -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 in your command line parameters. also you can add -a 1 or -a 2.

[maddi]

hello please help me

i use 3x 280x r9

my bat file config is

clpts_x86.exe -o ypool.net:10034:8080:8081:8082:8083:8084:8085:8086:8087 -u try.a -p 1 -a 1 -t 0,1,2


but the miner always crash.. please help me..

[Schwede65]

Hello

Sick

3 R9 290 Sapphire

2800cpm

Test Windows 8.1 64bits Drivers 14.1 SDK 2.9

Help help

1. please post your .bat-commands for the miner (-t + -a)
2. go back to catalyst 13.12 - 14.1 (beta!) doesn't work properly for my w7-64-rig

[ugurbost]

I've read all the pages in one night and summarized some performance results (which card gets how many CPMs) from the discussion. And wanted to share it. I wish I could upload it in more elegant way (web friendly), but unfortunately I couldn't manage it. If someone can transform it in a web form it'd be great.
You can checkout from https://www.dropbox.com/s/yl5abbfv6k5oehc/clpts-results.xlsx

BTW: Great job NaN, thanks.

[marcolecorse]

Hello

Sick

3 R9 290 Sapphire

2800cpm

Test Windows 8.1 64bits Drivers 14.1 SDK 2.9

Help help

[Mr305]

Hello I have a Saphire R9 270X with 4GB on W7 x64 and AMD 14.1 Drivers.

I have -t 0,0 -a 2

and it runs with 1900-2000 CPM. Is one 0 for one Thread on the Card which takes 1,25 GB? It was talking about to run 3 Threads which one BAT file?

[lir111]

@lir111: What are your command line options?

Ouch meaning what? Sucked he had to have someone else fix it? Or that 14.1 drivers suck?

No, "ouch" because AMD f***ed it up. I hoped that those times were over... That is not the only problem with the Catalyst drivers (e.g. the 290(X) performance inconsistency in Windows and Linux)

-t 0,1,2 -a 1

[NoVaMiner]

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?

I've seen people post 4100-4500 cpm under ubuntu for the R9 290X... they all noticed a huge gain when they switched from windows... I think folks have made the same comment on other cards, but its been less noticeable for most cards, but the 290 series sure does not like windows for some reason...

little off topic... anyone looking to get some smaller cards, I am selling cards to upgrade to other cards... so if you're looking for some smaller R9 270 2GB series cards check out my posting in the other forum here, powered risers can also be included...

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3069.0

That's a huge performance difference, especially with the hit PTS earnings have taken with all the new miners jumping in ypool.  I need the machine running windows (Server 2012r2 actually) during the day.  I'll have to experiment with SMOS tomorrow and see if it supports the MB and NIC.

[Darkbane]

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?

I've seen people post 4100-4500 cpm under ubuntu for the R9 290X... they all noticed a huge gain when they switched from windows... I think folks have made the same comment on other cards, but its been less noticeable for most cards, but the 290 series sure does not like windows for some reason...

little off topic... anyone looking to get some smaller cards, I am selling cards to upgrade to other cards... so if you're looking for some smaller R9 270 2GB series cards check out my posting in the other forum here, powered risers can also be included...

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3069.0

[morecpmplz]

@lir111: What are your command line options?

Ouch meaning what? Sucked he had to have someone else fix it? Or that 14.1 drivers suck?

No, "ouch" because AMD f***ed it up. I hoped that those times were over... That is not the only problem with the Catalyst drivers (e.g. the 290(X) performance inconsistency in Windows and Linux)

I so hope the Windows issue is resolved for the 290x's.  Not sure how long I can stomach Linux's lack of undervolting/clocking tools for these cards.  I can't even see what voltage my cards are running at...

Has anyone tried mining with the 14.1 drivers on windows with the 290x's?

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?

Overclocked 7970's / 280X's are getting 3500CPM on Windows so needless to say there's an issue with the Hawaii cards.  My 290X's on Linux net me 4500 CPM each @ 1125/1400.

[NoVaMiner]

@lir111: What are your command line options?

Ouch meaning what? Sucked he had to have someone else fix it? Or that 14.1 drivers suck?

No, "ouch" because AMD f***ed it up. I hoped that those times were over... That is not the only problem with the Catalyst drivers (e.g. the 290(X) performance inconsistency in Windows and Linux)

I so hope the Windows issue is resolved for the 290x's.  Not sure how long I can stomach Linux's lack of undervolting/clocking tools for these cards.  I can't even see what voltage my cards are running at...

Has anyone tried mining with the 14.1 drivers on windows with the 290x's?

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?