Hello again,
I just want to write my opinion here about the whole discussion and the evaluation approach of workers and maybe I am wrong:
- BitShares according to whitepaper is an industrial-grade decentralized platform built for high-performance financial smart contracts. It represents the first decentralized autonomous community that lets its core token holder decide on its future direction and products.
- "Industrial-grade decentralized platform" should be looking forward to cover up the demand of the Industrial-grade, I don't see any workers for that, I see no communications with true Industrial-grade but exchanges and legacy tokens listing approaches.
- Investors themselves are not using the platform to offer Industrial-grade services and financial smart contracts but instead they fork the network.
- Investors must focus on use cases to utilize the utility BTS more than focusing on listing it at exchanges.
- What is the current direction and the products?, letting the developers to decide and offer their ideas while investors waiting for these ideas to evaluate it, investors must do their work and developers must do their work.
- BitShares network has a great team of developers and I loved them all, many thanks to backend and frontend developers.
- BitShares combines trinity pillars; (Investors, Developers and Users), any individual can be the three together.
- Investors must agree on a scope according to a common vision every period of time, the scope must get voted and demand a mission.
- Investors must come up with the mission and developers must execute accordingly, developers are not responsible for the value of BTS but the investors, developers will get development requests from investors and not the vise versa.
- The value of BTS is important to maintain the developers interests and to keep them happy.
- Investors must realize that every BTS paid to a developer will devalue BTS because its most likely will be sold for cheaper and cheaper value once it's paid so they have to choose the scope carefully, the scope development results must cover up the BTS devaluation or turn it into a higher value or other wise it shouldn't get voted.
- Developers must be consulted about the feasibility of developing the scope and must create workers to apply it with a clear implementation plan.