Forgat to add as i already promoted DPOS1 for several months that i personly will support
vote decay and DPOS1 (one vote for one person only) both for witness and committee
But i don't support that non active members get a reward across from active members on bitshares dex as this is a clear paradox since we want active members on bitshares dex.
There didn't have non active members and active members.
The active members which you mean just a group of people want to get profit every moment, you think they love bts but they only love profit, they want the management right just as they want to squeeze more profit from bts, if they can't get any profit from bts, they will run away very quickly. They didn't care about the further development of bts is good or bad, they just care about how to get the more profit from it as soon as possible, this is the reality.
As the new rule, if a account has any amount bts locked in "permanently locked state", then the rest bts in this account will have normal VP, the most account VP will exist like this, so it didn't affect the most account which want to participate the management but didn't want to lock bts.
You just need to lock 1 bts in a "permanently locked state", then you will have a "permanently locked state" 
The no active member which you mean, they just only can get reward from the further development of bts, not come from the immediate profit.
For the debtor, they were gambler, anything can't change that(even i have margin position, i still need to define it like that), no company and system want to be managed by gambler, they just try to gain more and more profit from the collateral, the management what they want，just as they can get profit from the margin as soon as possible，when the price dropped，when they can‘t bear the risk，then they will use the VP of big collateral to make a cheating decision to save their position！ So they must not have the VP.
No defi and stablecoin project will be allowed to give the management right to a debtor, as when give the management right to a debtor, that mean the player and the referee become one person, this project will fail fast.
If you have a margin position and was in margin call, can you keep the impartiality in the voting？I can't and i believe the most of the person can't, it is human nature, when i have a position in margin call，then i will becom blinded and crazy，i will vote anything to keep my position，yes，i have voted the BSIP76 once，even i didn't have a position in margin call，but i‘m afraid，so i do it subconsciously.
A gambler is crazy, nothing can stop them!
这句话也讲给所有的债仓持有者：
如果你有债仓且在强平排队中，你们能够保证你们在投票中保持公平公正吗？我做不到，我相信绝大多数人都做不到，人性使然，当我有一个债仓且在强平排队时，我必然会变的盲目与疯狂，我会投给任何可以保护我的债仓不被强平的提案，即使是作弊提案，不错，我也曾经投过BSIP76, 即使我的债仓离强平还有相当一段距离而且基本不可能被爆，但是恐惧感使我下意识的去做了投票。
没有什么事情可以阻止赌徒的疯狂！
即便是抵押的bts没有投票权，抵押者依然可以通过调仓的方式临时获得大量的临时投票权重，就跟现在锁喂价这种情况，全部贴着线把bts调仓调出来，你们会发现冒出海量的调仓票权。
Topic: 4.0 投票机制变化 (Read 44949 times)
