1 share 1 vote sounds better than the current system. Because I think the current system will allow 1 person or 1 small group of people with high amount of btsx, to control ALL delegates. Leading to centralization.
One share 1 vote means that x% of the time a bad guy can produce disruptive blocks, skip blocks of the good guys, etc.
Just as a coin has two sides, no side is better than the other; it is often difficult to distinguish what is right from what is wrong?
We just need a law , justice and equality，1 share 1 vote is the right way.
Now, 1 person or 1 small group of people with high amount of btsx, he can control ALL delegatesbut, another side ,a lot of people can't vote to be a delegate even them win a lot of votes ,because them need over 700000000 votes ,Obviously this is not scientific。We can imagine,DPOS will be die without competition!
If a bad guy can produce disruptive blocks，I guess he cann't be a delegate anymore,because every one can voting them out of the top 101。just the opposite，if not 1 share 1 vote,a bad guy supported by two or three group who has a great deal of bts,maybe he will always on the top 101.
here is the voice from the Chinese,people pay close attention to this. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6536.0https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6529.0https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6578.0https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6514.0
And I think 1 share 1 vote is the foundation of DPOS