Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - puppies

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 111
136
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares has sponsored the Daily Decrypt for 4 weeks starting 9th Feb
« on: February 09, 2016, 06:27:06 pm »
What Akado said, plus in message three perhaps change proof of stake to delegated proof of stake.  We don't want people to write us off as a standard pos coin.

137
General Discussion / Re: Reddit PM Token Giveaway (Please participate and share!)
« on: February 09, 2016, 06:20:56 pm »
Nice work fuzzy

138
General Discussion / Re: Will this community be surpporting BM's "zero fee" proposal to get micropayment?
« on: February 09, 2016, 04:41:51 am »
@Xeldal   +5%

139
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 09, 2016, 04:34:25 am »
Quote from: xeroc on February 04, 2016, 08:30:16 am
Quote from: Xypher on February 04, 2016, 08:08:42 am
Quote from: xeroc on February 04, 2016, 07:57:45 am
that machine is a little overkill .. it could house 5 witness nodes :)

That's a fraction of a fraction of our infrastructure :)
Is there a financial incentive for hosting the nodes?
Documentation ?
No financial benefits.
http://docs.bitshares.eu/bitshares/tutorials/full-node-usage.html

I have not yet read into hosting a SSL secured node but that might come eventually ..
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-secure-nginx-with-let-s-encrypt-on-ubuntu-14-04 free and easy
Adding ssl was super easy.  I used

140
General Discussion / Re: [poll] bug found Should the committee use the committee-trade account to trade
« on: February 09, 2016, 02:41:52 am »
There is no owner permission for the committee-account.  The owner of committee-trade account is the committee-account.

141
General Discussion / Re: API Servers for Wallet
« on: February 09, 2016, 02:33:46 am »
I have set up a wallet/faucet server with ssl.  it is at dele-puppy.com  It is currently usable.  Please feel free to test.

I will still need to set up automatic renewal of my ssl certificates, and change the account the wallet is pulling from, but it can be used now. 

I set this wallet/faucet up more as a learning experience than anything else, but if there is a need for it, I can keep it up and updated. 

Please let me know if anything is not working as intended.  It is running todays wallet upgrade.

142
General Discussion / Re: Will this community be surpporting BM's "zero fee" proposal to get micropayment?
« on: February 09, 2016, 02:25:28 am »
IMO we need to find the money to implement this.  This would be best with a worker proposal paid direct from the shareholders.  If they are unwilling to spend the money of such a massive upgrade then we should fund it with an FBA.  How would this FBA make money?  Perhaps on transactions that are above and beyond the rate limit a portion goes to the FBA.

143
General Discussion / Re: [poll] bug found Should the committee use the committee-trade account to trade
« on: February 09, 2016, 02:21:27 am »
Quote from: abit on February 09, 2016, 01:48:37 am
Quote from: puppies on February 09, 2016, 01:46:49 am
I for example, do not have the active key of dele-puppy loaded into any wallets.
I think you mean owner key.
Quite right.  thanks abit.

144
General Discussion / Re: [poll] bug found Should the committee use the committee-trade account to trade
« on: February 09, 2016, 01:46:49 am »
@Thom The committee-account does not have an owner.  The committee-account active authorities are determined by voting. 

The owner key is not the key that registered the account.  It is supposed to be the key that is used to adjust the active keys.  I for example, do not have the active key of dele-puppy loaded into any wallets.  If someone hacked one of my servers and got my active key, I should be able to use that offline owner key to change my active key and lock the attacker out. 

145
General Discussion / Re: [poll] bug found Should the committee use the committee-trade account to trade
« on: February 08, 2016, 11:08:24 pm »
Ill create the proposal later.  If someone beats me to it that would be just fine.

146
General Discussion / Re: Will this community be surpporting BM's "zero fee" proposal to get micropayment?
« on: February 08, 2016, 09:05:38 pm »
Quote from: Ander on February 08, 2016, 08:36:50 pm
Quote from: -banano- on February 08, 2016, 08:11:10 am
its simple

rate limited / time share

all dex trades will be free or very cheap  and memberships rewards still in effect

small players cant make trades and cancel too many times or they get locked out for short period

big players can spam network, but need to purchase big stake first

coupled with % based fees, BTS now is competitive with DAG mesh networks like IOTA and cheaper than Ethereum

Wow this is actually...a good idea!

So essentially one could make a limited number of 'free' transactions in a time period, and trades made would have a percentage based fee.  (I've wanted to see a percentage based trading fee with incredibly low base fee for a while).  Power users would need to buy a lot of stake to get enough free trades?



One worry is that we need to make sure we avoid blockchain bloat so that Bitshares is sustainable in the future. 

We need to ensure we do not allow spamming (including the possibility of someone making 10000 accounts and using all of them to spam, essentially performing a sybil attack on the free transaction limit). 

We need to ensure that the network is still generating some fees.  (Percentage based trading fees is great).  This is needed both for the referral program to work, and for BTS to have value.

One of the major benefits of basing this off of stake is that it prevents sybils.  If you create 10000 empty accounts you wont be able to them to get free transactions since they all have 0 stake.  If you spread your stake out to these 10000 accounts then you will get the same amount of free transfers that you would get from all of your stake being in one account.

147
General Discussion / Re: Will this community be surpporting BM's "zero fee" proposal to get micropayment?
« on: February 08, 2016, 07:27:01 pm »
I really like the idea of no fees, and some form of coin days being used to prevent spam.  Free transfers would be a huge marketing plus.

I would like to see the ability to transact above and beyond the limited number of free transactions.  This would charge a fee of course.  I would also like to see the rate at which coin days are earned higher for LTM. 

It would also be good if you could point your coin days earned on one account to another account.  That way you could run a bot, without having all of your funds accessible to your bot.

148
General Discussion / Re: Buy $1 of Bitcoin
« on: February 08, 2016, 05:06:52 pm »
I use circle and they are fast and efficient.  I don't know how long it takes to set up an account, but once set up buying BTC  is quick and easy.

149
General Discussion / Re: Things I don't like about the committee
« on: February 07, 2016, 08:10:14 pm »
Quote from: kenCode on February 07, 2016, 08:05:30 pm
Quote from: puppies on February 07, 2016, 07:26:39 pm
I don't think that I am more important than any one else

You are not your f*cking khaki's! ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe5MtupXTL0

Best movie ever.

150
General Discussion / Re: IRC/telegram as a trollbox?
« on: February 07, 2016, 07:50:51 pm »
We could expand it a little further too.  I changed the memo key of Twitter.puppies to the same key as announce.  We could have the wallet show all transfers to any account that has that same memo key.  This way we can send messages directly to  others but still have them in our troll box.  We could automate the creation of accounts with that memo key,  and automatically create transfers from that account when typing in the troll box.  This allows responding like most other trollboxes.  Then we just need a way to ignore users. 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 111

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 22 queries.