Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If you don't want the tokens then you're free to sell them as you see fit, I wouldn't let the economic policies get in the way of claiming your sharedrop. I'm sure people would be interested in picking up some cheap WLS on the BTS DEX.Can anyone explain why whaleshares doesn't have the inflation protection for vested balances that steem has?AFAIK you cannot powerdown until mid october, and the rate of powerdown is affected by the platform's inflation rate.
Why should I *not* claim the sharedrop, withdraw and sell as quickly as the rules allow?
Yes, that's what I meant with "as quickly as the rules allow".I'm not sure about inflation protection, do you mean receiving rewards for held stakepower over time?
STEEM pays 90% of inflation into the vested steem pool, which looks like "interest" on vested steem / steem power. Apparently WLS doesn't do that, so effectively vested WLS are losing value due to inflation.
Thanks.AFAIK you cannot powerdown until mid october, and the rate of powerdown is affected by the platform's inflation rate.
Can anyone explain why whaleshares doesn't have the inflation protection for vested balances that steem has?
Why should I *not* claim the sharedrop, withdraw and sell as quickly as the rules allow?
502 Bad GatewaySame, can't connect to this.
You can't do this through the UI yet, but it's in the works: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1537I really think Bitshares needs to find a way to collateralise with bitcoin instead of BTS. (don't worry BTS will still have value because its need to pay fees)You can just create another (private) MPA e.g. YOUR.USD backed by YOUR.BTC.
Yes we could create bitUSD backed by OPEN.BTC but as a centralised IOU people won't trust it. Hence the need for a trustless BTC / sidechain.ACCT/trustless BTC (and other cryptos) is a good proposal & on the core roadmap, but people are also seemingly willing to trust entities like USDT which may be using cryptocurrency as backing collateral - if an UIA had the marketcap of USDT with semi-proven backing collateral (1up on USDT lol) then that'd bring a lot of value to the BTS DEX (fees at least).
"reference_asset": {"name": "Multipass.USD", "amount": 1, "feed_price": bitUSD.median_feed_price}
"allowed_backing": {
"BTC": {"allowed_tokens": [<gateway(s)>.BTC, bitBTC], "feed_price": (reference_asset["feed_price"]/bitBTC.median_feed_price)},
"ETH": {"allowed_tokens": [<gateway(s)>.ETH, bitETH], "feed_price": (reference_asset["feed_price"]/bitETH.median_feed_price)},
"USD": {"allowed_tokens": [<gateway(s)>.USD, bitUSD], "feed_price": (reference_asset["feed_price"]/bitUSD.median_feed_price)},
"BTS": {"allowed_tokens": [BTS], "feed_price": (1/reference_asset["feed_price"])},
}
Sorry, I should have phrased my previous post better - Akledirs has been unbanned from the main Bitshares telegram channel, his post was mistaken for spam by a channel admin (telegram has a horrible spam problem).Akledirs should be unbanned from the main channel now.
I'm not into the telegram thing. Could someone ask to unblock Akledirs there? Maybe provide a link to this thread as a reference. Thanks!
(For this information and recommendation sold other MPA from derivatives-dex I was banned from Telegram-group bitsharesDEX)
They probably have some kind of rule not to mention specific assets to prevent spam.
#29806541 blackswan baiducom - collateral price (36 bts)
Another problem is how to engage witnesses or committee members in publishing prices. What if an asset owner is not a witness and all witnesses stop publishing price. In such case the asset becomes frozen.
Another unobvious moment - the right of access to a change in the market commission - you can still establish it at 99%.
Haha! You mean making the market fee like 100%? What a wonderful idea! I'll add it to the main post.
