we understand that although BSIP42 worker proposal is active

Quote from: sschiessl on August 27, 2018, 01:42:09 pm

As it stands right now, the worker proposal has no definition when it will become active, nor is it complete. No one should vote for it. But it seems with 400 million and more votes, it will be done. I strongly disagree that proper formalities were skipped, simply because our whales want to push it through.

I do like your suggestion to have it in a constantly evaluated stage. The BSIP is considered accepted, if the proposal is active AND carries more votes than the against proposal (one vote more is enough).

My suggestion:

a) Finish the proposal by including the discussion and shareholder summary. Also include an exact definition when it is considered active. This should be done by @abit or @bitcrab as the driving force behind it
b) Once the BSIP is completed, give at least 1 week grace period so shareholders can vote for or against it (the date when it can earliest become active should be included in the BSIP as well)

My personal opinion:
As the proposal stands right now I can not vote for it for formal reason, completely independent of the content. I would be rather forced to vote for "status quo" until the formalities are reinstated. Currently, everyone is swayed by the mere overwhelming power that bitcrab carries, yet I want to see that even he upholds formal procedure. This is crucial for me, as it only empowers the power abuse discussion involving our whales.

BSIP42 can be regarded as a request to community to permit witnesses to try some new way of feeding.

the core idea in the BSIP42 is "negative feed back feed price" based on the premium/discount of smartcoin, however, no detailed specification are provided, because I think it may be not a good way for abit or me to provide a detailed algorithm and ask the witnesses to adopt, discussion are on going and we keep on suggesting, but I think finally witnesses will develop different algorithms to feed price based on their own understanding. this diversity is also essential for decentralization.

I will try to add more discussion to the BSIP later.

• What if none get active?
• What if both remain inactive?
• Does a non active "don't support it" proposal lead to implementation even if the "support it" is not active?

• Account history export has now access to full history independent of the connected node (utilizing the elastic search plugin, courtesy of BitShares Europe until the deployment from the infrastructure worker is complete). This allows to create a .csv report that can be used for cointracking.info. Please find more details here
• Dashboard (Starred/Featured Markets) is now split up to display it per selected base

Quote from: btsindex on August 20, 2018, 03:34:45 pm

Quote from: Customminer on August 20, 2018, 03:06:06 pm

you could transfer ownership of the MPA to null

So null is like noone's account? It looks like a regular bts user.

Sending anything to null is the same as burning/destroying the item - by transfering asset ownership to null you destroy the owner permissions/keys & nobody else is in control of any of the MPA settings from that point onwards.