136
DAC PLAY / Re: Play project sold 1000BTC , and bought 30,0000 BitCNY with part of that money
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:08:40 pm »
Sorry should have quoted delulo
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
137
DAC PLAY / Re: Play project sold 1000BTC , and bought 30,0000 BitCNY with part of that money
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:03:52 pm »Ok, what's done is done. (1000k BTC sell)Selling another 450 BTC?It is reasonable to sell at least half of the raised funds. Otherwise you are in the business of speculating on BTC...
https://blockchain.info/address/3DPD7z66T7DXULvFZUsc4xNcVS2q68TM3u
yup, i would do same!
i3 lost a lot of their funds due BTC price volatility
But so far they've raised just under 2K BTC.
So selling another 450 BTC is not half of the raised funds.
138
General Discussion / Re: Anouncement Concerning BTS Vesting
« on: January 20, 2015, 11:59:15 am »another dump will beginLOL
139
DAC PLAY / Re: Play project sold 1000BTC , and bought 30,0000 BitCNY with part of that money
« on: January 20, 2015, 11:15:41 am »140
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: DACx 100% delegates proposal: dacx.baozou
« on: January 20, 2015, 08:44:04 am »
Very nice, you've got my vote.
Couple of questions though:
PLAY is using your platform for their crowdfunding at the moment.
What's the difference with other IPO's so far, except for being listed on DACX?
Once shares are sold and traded on the BTS platform, how will shareholders be able to withdraw them?
Just by direct sending? Would this make every project crowd funded on DACX a BitShares Asset?
Edit: I guess there is no need to withdraw shares from regular companies.
But how will this work for crypto related projects?
Couple of questions though:
PLAY is using your platform for their crowdfunding at the moment.
What's the difference with other IPO's so far, except for being listed on DACX?
Once shares are sold and traded on the BTS platform, how will shareholders be able to withdraw them?
Just by direct sending? Would this make every project crowd funded on DACX a BitShares Asset?
Edit: I guess there is no need to withdraw shares from regular companies.
But how will this work for crypto related projects?
141
General Discussion / Re: BTS Tracker for Mobile Phone, anyone?
« on: January 19, 2015, 08:11:26 am »Great app thanks.Cryptonator has been my weapon of choice for this job.
https://cryptonator.com/
Was using Coin Ticker for over a year, but they can't be bothered with updating their feeds and app.
142
BitShares PTS / Re: To buy or not to buy PTS, that is the question.
« on: January 17, 2015, 07:06:17 pm »I don't know where you guys are getting your information but PLS:There's no "new consensus", it seems everyone is happily ignoring dan's suggestion to drop on BTS. RPC, sparkle, play, etc
PLAYshares (PLS) allocations: 35 % will go to BTS holders on December 8, 2014 12:00 PM (UTC).
Sparkle had a snapshot on December 14th, 2014 and will honor AGS, PTS, and BTS with 33% each.
....
My bad, I didn't know PLS wasn't doing AGS/PTS. My personal suggestion is to drop on AGS/PTS because that's still a better demographic than BTS at the moment. But I have no control over what 3rd party devs do.
Holding PTS entitled me to get my share from the VOTE/DNS merger. I was entitled to BTS from this merger on december 8, however I didn't receive them yet.
So I won't get PLS?
35% BTS 10% PTS 10% AGS, and the rest for crowdfunding and development etc...
143
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Yunbi exchange TWO 100% developer delegates proposal: d1.yunbi ; d2.yunbi
« on: January 17, 2015, 11:42:43 am »Will that be any easier to explain to the western folks?Will you also be listing DVS?
it will be really hard to explain to the Chinese of a "legitimate theft" is ok on Devshares for which they will pay real money to buy if enlisted .
Kind of serious question, no sarcasm intended.
144
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Yunbi exchange TWO 100% developer delegates proposal: d1.yunbi ; d2.yunbi
« on: January 17, 2015, 09:49:54 am »
Will you also be listing DVS?
145
General Discussion / Re: Rumor Has It - Big News Coming Out Tomorrow at BTC Miami
« on: January 16, 2015, 11:59:26 am »It seems that Adam guy and Charles are on other sides. Adam said watch ok coin, which has some big dumps at the moment. And Charles says to go longProbably the Bitcoin ETF thing or secondmarkets investment trust thing
I bet on this. Hopefully something like that..
*Bracing for impact.*
146
General Discussion / Re: Rumor Has It - Big News Coming Out Tomorrow at BTC Miami
« on: January 16, 2015, 10:30:37 am »
Last tweet from someone we all know, Charles Hoskinson
2hours ago:
2hours ago:
Quote
@nprojectcharles: Major bitcoin news coming very soon. Hope you're long
147
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 0.5.0 Feedback
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:48:42 am »
All working fine here to windows 8.
Forgot that the fork hadn't kicked in yet and tried to import the vesting balances.
Got this error:
Not sure if this is a problem, but should the DVS be in this line?
Forgot that the fork hadn't kicked in yet and tried to import the vesting balances.
Got this error:
Quote
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
eval_state._current_state->get_head_block_num() >= DVS_V0_5_0_FORK_BLOCK_NUM
Not sure if this is a problem, but should the DVS be in this line?
148
General Discussion / Re: The bitcoin death spiral has begun?
« on: January 15, 2015, 01:10:55 am »Should people sell BTS to buy bitUSD until the bloodbath ends?
Exactly. We can only "guess" what *may *happen to the price. Nobody knows for sure. This is why short term trading is gambling unless you are a professional. It is much better to pick a long term investment and just hold for 2-3 years instead of day trading as a newbie.
149
General Discussion / Re: I suggest stop price feed and stop market engine
« on: January 14, 2015, 09:08:15 am »I don`t know the detail regular of BID and ask.
but I `d to say some as macroscopic view .
we cannot protect short so much. short should have risk. this risk restrict people short too many BTA . so it can limit the total supply of BTA . if bitusd is over supply,I think the price cannot peg.
I agree with you. But the problem is I can't buy enough bitUSD or bitCNY to cover my short order in wallet market, I even tried to short some bitUSD, but it is automatically filled by other people which is my mistake not awaring of the existed BTS sell order though. But I really don't know what to do if I had awared. Thanks alt, he helped me to add collateral. But when 30 days deadline reached and there is still no bitUSD at then price I will let it expire I guess.
What will happen when this expire thing happens if there is no enough BTS buy/short order then? thanks everyone for a clarification on this question.
It will put in a BTS buy order, at the feed price
150
General Discussion / Re: I suggest stop price feed and stop market engine
« on: January 14, 2015, 08:56:14 am »You mean not enough people want to buy BitUSD right now?
I wouldn't halt the market. If it can't stay operational in a situation like this how can we ever sell it in the future.
This would be the last thing we need right now, if we stop the markets BTS will go down, and we will be in bigger trouble.
BTS is outperforming BTC at the moment.
BTC seems to be over dumped at the 900 CNY level. (Time will tell)
I think we should see a reversal pretty soon.
