Perhaps it would be a good idea to show a day-to-day and month-to-month % change.   I don't think I would really appreciate very minor changes in my holdings relative to the entire user-base, but if the interface pointed out the specific change whether good or bad would be valuable.

Anybody working on this?

PTS is totally different from other cryptocurrency, its not suprising to me to see it running away.  Bitcoin is really "expensive" by the estimation of most observers, so these other "cryptos" are just as good since they're so undervalued compared to Bitcoin.  Litecoin has long been called the silver to Bitcoins gold so the analogy makes sense and the upward price pushes them all up as a rising tide lifts all boats.


The market is as frothy as i've ever seen it, this is money spilling from bitcoin into everything around it.  PTS is not around Bitcoin, PTS is new and unique and frankly hasn't had the best public entrance so it doesnt have good hype  surrounding it except to the core believers.  Once Invictus delivers something expect a whole new ballgame, until then it's just another altcoin nobody owns.

I like the idea of an automated arbitration system that essentially presents the thing that needs a decision to a random % of the holders of SolomonShares.  The more specialized your need for arbitration, the more expensive it is.  The cheapest service would be a summary judgement with 1% of the network polled and it's a random 1%. 

A reputation system could be enacted to determine which arbiters are "better".  What does better even mean?  Maybe it means % voting with the majority decision

Looks like on Cryptsy if you are willing to wait a little while you're able to buy at below .01/ea - That would be my suggestions.

Most of the protoshares billionaires I know have put away their shares until the first release, the ones who are actively playing the game are doing so at retail markets like Cryptsy.  You can tell by looking at the buy/sell boards that even early and unstable exchanges have crowded out the forum market.

The team developing it is meeting in Milan.

I can personally vouch for more than half the people involved with the Dark Wallet project, Amir Taaki is not good at playing politics and the development team think he is dangerous because of that.  He is a brilliant developer and is leading a very passionate team who are trying to solve a tough problem.  It is actually the same problem Invictus is trying to solve also.

You can believe what you want, but if my opinion means anything this is a project that will improve the ecosystem run by people who are not PC but very committed to decentralization and better tools for users to take their privacy back.

I'm not a fan of google docs