Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - abit

Pages: 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 [274] 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 ... 311
4096
General Discussion / Re: Announcing Brownie Points (BROWNIE.PTS)
« on: July 04, 2015, 08:04:17 am »
I'd like to get some BP if it's possible.

* submit issues/comments and fixes in Github (id: abitmore)
* help identify problems / answer questions in forum
* attend some mumble sessions earlier this year

My BTS ID is abit.

Thanks.

4097
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 代表们 - 证券交易所指标 - 更新到bts_tools的0.2.4版本
« on: June 08, 2015, 06:54:35 am »
 +5%
Why no SHANGHAI?

4098
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 新手开钱包，送1BTS http://www.btaer.com/
« on: June 07, 2015, 03:04:48 pm »
顶一下

4099
General Discussion / Re: Need issue dividend function for BTA
« on: May 27, 2015, 01:09:12 am »
See here for earlier discussion and thoughts about implementation
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/1430

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14785.msg191711#msg191711

4100
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 钱包问题求助：Missing signature 和 Wrong string
« on: May 26, 2015, 12:53:36 am »
Quote from: bitshares on May 26, 2015, 12:39:31 am
还是不对，请教下钱包的问题应该从哪儿找答案？bm等就不管吗？
完整报错信息贴上来看看。应该有很多行。
只有一句话不好诊断。

加西部群吧 247971500 。论坛上的人少。

4101
General Discussion / Re: Why does the bitshares_client use 10x the memory of bitcoind?
« on: May 25, 2015, 02:58:44 pm »
When talking about disk IO bottleneck, we always check I and O (reads and writes) separately. We can't avoid IO, we just reduce the frequency, at lease reduce random accessing.
There are still rooms available for performance optimizing with the use of leveldb, E.G.
* The optional FilterPolicy mechanism can be used to reduce the number of disk reads substantially.
* Using less quantity of level DB's will hopefully reduce competing on writes/compacts.
* Better design of keys (of values)
* Compressing and caching

Anyway, if we've already chosen another way, please go ahead.

4102
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 0.9的钱包真TM费劲
« on: May 25, 2015, 01:43:26 pm »
Quote from: qingfengyeah on May 25, 2015, 10:47:19 am
钱包同步后退，之前同步完成了73%，后来慢慢的只同步完成69%，一直在同步都不够出块快，真是奇琶了！
清风yeah？好像以前见过这个名字

4103
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 0.9的钱包真TM费劲
« on: May 25, 2015, 01:42:42 pm »
Quote from: qingfengyeah on May 25, 2015, 10:47:19 am
钱包同步后退，之前同步完成了73%，后来慢慢的只同步完成69%，一直在同步都不够出块快，真是奇琶了！
卡块了。如果重启不能解决问题的话，删了peers.leveldb目录重试，还不行就是区块数据坏了，删了区块目录重新同步。可以从网盘直接下载替换，不知道地址的话加西部群。

4104
General Discussion / Re: Open letter to the bitUSD bulls
« on: May 07, 2015, 07:57:36 am »
To bitUSD shorters:
with the new rule, although no need to worry about expiration, new short orders will be margin called at 90% of feed price when price of BTS drop to 66.6% (was 50% yesterday).

4105
General Discussion / Re: BitShares Timeline?
« on: May 06, 2015, 04:47:48 am »
The reason is simple: there is no plan. Everything changes too fast. It's nothing to do with a tool.

4106
General Discussion / Re: BitAsset 2.0 Requirements & Implied Design
« on: May 05, 2015, 05:05:19 pm »
Quote from: xiahui135 on May 05, 2015, 03:20:16 pm
A very important question:

Can the shorts use the collateral to cover their orders?

the longs can directly buy BTS, but the shorts can not use their collateral even the collateral is enough.

THIS IS WHAT I FOUND ON NXT FORUM:

"
Within 9 days my position was down near 10%. I decided I would take the loss and exit the trade.

Well, in attempting to close the trade, I kept getting error messages saying I didn't have enough bitUSD to buy back what I shorted.

I thought maybe this was a bug with one of the updated versions. I went to the forums and posted my problem.

To my surprise I was told I was stuck unless I went and bought more BTS and then bought more bitUSD to cover my existing short even though I had enough BTS locked in collateral to buy near 2 times the amount of BTS I had shorted.
"
See this link: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,13782.0/all.html
and this issue: https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/issues/1499

4107
General Discussion / BitGold.com launched.
« on: May 05, 2015, 02:50:28 am »
https://www.bitgold.com/

4108
General Discussion / Re: BitAsset 2.0 Requirements & Implied Design
« on: May 05, 2015, 12:12:34 am »
Quote from: bytemaster on May 04, 2015, 05:12:46 pm
Quote from: abit on May 04, 2015, 05:11:15 pm
tl;dr
HOW to guarantee that each bitUSD could be changed back to one-USD-worth of BTS in a black swan event, especially when there is a daily % set?

Black swan has BitUSD converted to BTS... no more guarantee.
If there is no such guarantee, it means BitUSD is NOT fully backed. When a black swan come, the last one who holds BitUSD will be unable to convert to BTS, because there would be no cover order exists on the market. On other words, in this case one BitUSD doesn't worth one USD. It doesn't make sense to set a hard-coded price floor.

4109
General Discussion / Re: BitAsset 2.0 Requirements & Implied Design
« on: May 04, 2015, 05:11:15 pm »
tl;dr
HOW to guarantee that each bitUSD could be changed back to one-USD-worth of BTS in a black swan event, especially when there is a daily % set?

4110
General Discussion / Re: BitAssets 2.0 (formally 3.0)
« on: May 04, 2015, 03:42:11 pm »
HOW to guarantee that each bitUSD could be changed back to one-USD-worth of BTS in a black swan event, especially when there is a daily % set?

Pages: 1 ... 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 [274] 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 ... 311

Page created in 0.161 seconds with 18 queries.