got a tl;DR in english?

A fund which will operate like the public market operation worker, but some money comes from outside, started the first fundraiser (target 50M-200M BTS).

Chinese version: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26820.msg320041#msg320041

只要喂价弄好，随便什么资产都可以用来抵押创建锚定资产的，系统直接支持，新建智能货币就可以。当然前提是抵押物本身有背书，各项参数设计合理稳定，才有人愿意玩。玩的人多了，自然会有机器人搬砖平衡市场。

I'm aware of the unclaimed funds: I don't tend to forget such sums of money, especially when they've appreciated like BTS has since they were allocated. My intent for the usage of the funds remains unchanged from my previous statements about it: I'll draw upon them for work I think especially important to the future of the chain.

... I plan to involve some of our engineers in development work prior to that time (I introduced the guys to the concepts of UIAs, for example, yesterday).

Thanks for the clarification and contributions.

One thing I would like to see now and would be willing to fund for a reasonable price from the allocated funds: an onchain or offchain solution to the bug where the vote counts aren't available for committee members that aren't presently elected. To me this seems like a distinct weakness in the governance system.

There is an github issue for this: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/issues/987, actually I've got an idea about how to fix it just a few days before, although not yet started to code, due to priority. It's also good if someone else can get it fixed. However, IMHO, efforts related to this issue can be covered by the core dev worker if there isn't a dedicated bounty for it.

Back to the topic, 7 million BTS seems a bit too huge in comparison to such small bounties. Now we already have a core dev worker to cover the maintenance job which was intention of this worker. Since we haven't yet decided how to use this fund, given the fact that most workers on chain now are being paid via escrows, I propose that we move the remaining funds of this worker to be controlled by an escrow service (for example BBF) or merge it with the core dev worker, if we still want to use it to fund core development / maintenance. We do want experienced project manager and developers to help and contribute, not only funds. On the other hand, if we're going to use it to fund other things, which would be out of this worker's scope, IMHO it's best to re-vote.

交 易 挖 矿 开 始 时 ， 参 与 交 易 挖 矿 的 交 易 对 为 ：
GDEX.BTC/bitCNY,
GDEX.ETH/bitCNY,
GDEX.EOS/bitCNY,
GDEX.SEER/bitCNY,
GDEX.BKBT/bitCNY,
GDEX.ETH/GDEX.BTC,
GDEX.EOS/GDEX.BTC,
 BTS/GDEX.BTC，

之后管理团队将根据实际情况不断加入交易对参与交易挖矿。

从刷的角度来说，刷bitcny交易对是非常不合算的，因为bitcny有0.1%的手续费，不参与手续费返还。一笔交易付两笔手续费，只返一半 GDP。

刷 BTS 还行，一笔交易付一笔手续费，全返 GDP。

效率最高是刷 GDEX.ETH / GDEX.BTC 或 GDEX.EOS/GDEX.BTC 对，一笔交易付两笔手续费，全返GDP。

AEX目前的当家人不是老黄，他无法充分理解BTS这一套，上次印了很多bitCNY的空头支票，后来bitCNY升值之后亏损较大，无法支持提现，过了半年才还帐。其实如果bitCNY都真实的，只会增加交易量收手续费，没必要下架。

空头支票？第一次听说。

After searching on internet and some experiments, I still couldn't figure out how to create a MPA.

Based on my understanding, the process of issuing an UIA is

* create asset
* issue it to an account

After this, you could transfer it to anyone you want.

While I am a little bit confused in the process of creating a MPA and how to use it.

Below is my current understanding:

* create asset with bitasset option
* publish feed for this asset
* borrow the asset
* sell the asset to complete (?)

I managed to create an MPA in cli_wallet, which could be listed in list_assets

```
unlocked >>> list_assets YW 1
list_assets YW 1
[{
    "id": "1.3.4",
    "symbol": "YWMPA",
    "precision": 5,
    "issuer": "1.2.17",
    "options": {
      "max_supply": "1000000000000000",
      "market_fee_percent": 0,
      "max_market_fee": "1000000000000000",
      "issuer_permissions": 79,
      "flags": 0,
      "core_exchange_rate": {
        "base": {
          "amount": 10000,
          "asset_id": "1.3.0"
        },
        "quote": {
          "amount": 80000,
          "asset_id": "1.3.4"
        }
      },
      "whitelist_authorities": [],
      "blacklist_authorities": [],
      "whitelist_markets": [],
      "blacklist_markets": [],
      "description": "",
      "extensions": []
    },
    "dynamic_asset_data_id": "2.3.4",
    "bitasset_data_id": "2.4.0"
  }
]
```

But I didn't pass the publish feed step. The assertion shows

> Assert Exception: bitasset.feeds.count(o.publisher):

I have no idea about this meaning. Any step I missed? What's is the correct step to create a MPA and do the exchange on bitshares?

`"issuer_permissions": 79` means you can't publish feeds from witnesses.
Check what permission the MPAs on mainnet has.
You can adjust the permissions or set feed producers in GUI, or use update_asset command in CLI.