Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
说白了， bitCNY 的主要问题是托不住盘， bitCNY 借越多贬值越多。托盘要靠 BTC 和 USDT 。
不托住盘，空军砸一下你就爆仓，多军变空军。
你要是还转不过弯来，我也不想和你多说了。
看看这贴。
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@blocktrades/using-a-bitshares-decentralized-exchange-dex-market-for-bitusd-and-bitcny-pricefeeds
If the exact peg finally lead BTS to 0, why should we insist on it?
smartcoin peg is one purpose of BTS, not all, or not at the highest priority.
we just found that BTS cannot afford smartcoin exact peg at any conditions, need to adjust the policy.
Because it is not the peg what drives Bts price down. Proof of this is that we have had sustained increases in dollar price without breaking the peg in the past.
This is a game not suitable playing period.
Stop trying to make BTS even more of a scam than it's already perceived to be.
Do you know what people including us would say about an asset that used reserve/investor funds to pump its own price up?
Stop trying to take shortcuts and turning BTS into a get rich quick scheme. Add value the old fashioned way.
1. That is a Pump scheme that immediately enables that rich trader to dump all his other or anyone else's BTS for massive profit. A predictable and publicly announcment price increase is inviting too many malicious players
GDEX报名。
最感兴趣的交易对：
BTS/BTC
BTS/USDT
BTC/USDT
BTC/bitCNY
USDT/bitCNY
EOS/bitCNY
I am pretty sure you were supporting me for a very long time, it's being like years I don't get complaints about my price feeds or anything related. The blockchain seems also to confirm my memory and theory:
This is your latest account update op: https://bitsharescan.com/transaction/f654d972de773118203a022170ae284b10ea46cc
From here you can see your voting slate before that last update: https://bitsharescan.com/transaction/d18bf2029f951daf26fe83737bc6f022dfb553cd
The diff shows that a vote for 1:27 was removed. Do you wanna guess who 1:27 is?
Not sure why you would cover it up or deny it...
Anyway, you are right about deciding important things by voting in the end. Thing is that "how to handle poll and their threshold" is a very important thing, and as that it should have been voted on! But no, there was no vote about changing the current rule for it, nor any discussion!
I would have started accepting and applying BSIP76 if 1) the rule about "how to handle poll and their threshold" was put to a vote and approved, or 2) if the relative poll-worker were above the current refund threshold.
I understand that 1) takes time, but why couldn't you guys go for 2)?
Obtain support from other proxies (as openledger or beos) to respect the current rule, get the worker-poll above the threshold, and ask witnesses to apply community will. Doesn't sound that difficult. If it was too much difficult, then that means there was no community agreement.
either BSIP76 should be regarded as pass or not, witnesses have already made their decision.
Witnesses were basically forced to since not accepting and applying BSIP76 would lead them to be unvoted, even if the voting process was in contrast with the current rule/social contract.
I am an example of that: you and cn-vote voted me out, and you did that even if I was the only one left not applying BSIP76 (for the good reasons mentioned above) and so even if my price feeding was useless from a consensus standpoint. The only reason to vote me out was for you and cn-vote to show witnesses what would mean not following your decision and your will.
