如果想真正的应对做空，那就是需要债仓在喂价下跌的时候不爆。

如何避免不爆？当前的一个思路就是做无风险借贷（出借人的资产不受风险干扰，只参与抵押率计算）：抵押者支付利息间接借贷智能资产/BTS来提高自己的综合抵押率来避免被爆，放开说就是，抵押者可以通过借贷智能资产/BTS来将自己的综合抵押提高到根本不可能爆的抵押率。
这个思路当前需要解决一个问题：抵押者无法支付利息而自身个人抵押率又资不抵债的问题，比如采用一种利息支付竞标方式来竞标这种形式的债仓。

比如当前小红的抵押率为1.6，喂价0.22bitcny，其抵押了1.6个bts借出了0.22bitcny，
1.假如借贷的是BTS：小红可以借6.4bts, 来将自己的综合抵押率提高到8，爆仓价格为0.0444bitcny，付年息为（当前铸币比如VSYS的一般为17%年化）1.088个bts，放到每月为0.091个bts。
2.假如借贷的是bitcny：小红需要借0.176bitcny，来将自己的综合抵押率提高到8，爆仓价格为0.0444bitcny，付年息为（当前定存USDT或者啥的算年化20%）0.0352bitcny，放到每月为0.0029bitcny。

这算的是5倍跌幅。

极限跌幅：6.6-0.22，跌30倍的话各位可以自己算算。

解决不了问题，也不是谁都愿意借。
也许唯有熔断，在一定条件下放弃锚定，让bitCNY贬值。
这次设0.22，问题是，就算是0.22现在也没有恢复上去，如果下一步大饼继续大跌，bitCNY贬值就不止两三个点了。

说白了， bitCNY 的主要问题是托不住盘， bitCNY 借越多贬值越多。托盘要靠 BTC 和 USDT 。
不托住盘，空军砸一下你就爆仓，多军变空军。
你要是还转不过弯来，我也不想和你多说了。
看看这贴。
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@blocktrades/using-a-bitshares-decentralized-exchange-dex-market-for-bitusd-and-bitcny-pricefeeds

没让你用bitCNY托盘啊，用BTC和USDT托，没问题啊。

现在不是开始锁死喂价嘛，爆仓问题不是无解啊。

谁都知道目前内盘交易量最大的基础货币是啥，贡献最多交易费的资产是啥，放弃？

内盘的吸引力很大一部分就在于可以抵押BTS去购买别的资产，只拼BTC交易，怎么去跟CEX拼？

现在真是一个个脾气都大得很。

人民币交易肯定bitCNY啊，还用得着想别的？

已经广被接受，承兑业务成熟，就算目前非常时期也只有2点几的贬值。

USDT与美元间的波动还动不动不止2%呢，怕什么？

This is a game not suitable playing period.

Stop trying to make BTS even more of a scam than it's already perceived to be.

Do you know what people including us would say about an asset that used reserve/investor funds to pump its own price up?

Stop trying to take shortcuts and turning BTS into a get rich quick scheme. Add value the old fashioned way.

just discuss something, what does "scam" come from?

we need BTS to be in high price, then the smartcoin can serve more scenario.

stop pretending to be nobility.

I am not talking about OMO, but another scenario:

A rich man/trader can pull BTS price to above 1CNY, however, he will do that only when he get 5M BTS as reward.

Is it possible to get this 5M BTS from worker and pay him for doing that?

Market cap management worker
daily pay:100K BTS, 3 months. committee-account as escrow.

when BTS price is pulled to above 0.6CNY and stay for more than 72 hours, pay 1.5M BTS to the worker owner.

when BTS price is pulled to above 0.8CNY and stay for more than 72 hours, pay 1.5M BTS to the worker owner.

when BTS price is pulled to above 1CNY and stay for more than 72 hours, pay the left 2M BTS to the worker owner.

this protocol will applied in 2 months, after that the left BTS will be refunded.

Thoughts?


 

出块间隔下调感觉可以考虑，3秒还是不够快。

多签网关到目前为止不觉得很可行。

As below two poll worker proposals have been voted active and got more support than the "do not set" worker proposals 1.14.219 and 1.14.221,
bitCNY feed threshold is set to 0.22CNY/BTS, bitUSD feed threshold is set to 0.0345USD/BTS.

1.14.222   Poll - BSIP76 - Set bitCNY feed threshold to 0.22CNY/BTS
1.14.220   Poll - BSIP76 - Set bitUSD feed threshold to 0.0345USD/BTS

1.14.219   Poll - BSIP76 - Do Not Set bitCNY feed threshold
1.14.221   Poll - BSIP76 - Do Not Set bitUSD feed threshold

Every witness is requested to update the feeding script to feed price in CNY at max(0.022CNY, market price, GS Protection price), in USD at max(0.0345USD, market price,GS Protection price).

For more information about the poll for this setting, please check https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29653.0, https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=29654.0

I am pretty sure you were supporting me for a very long time, it's being like years I don't get complaints about my price feeds or anything related. The blockchain seems also to confirm my memory and theory:

This is your latest account update op: https://bitsharescan.com/transaction/f654d972de773118203a022170ae284b10ea46cc

From here you can see your voting slate before that last update: https://bitsharescan.com/transaction/d18bf2029f951daf26fe83737bc6f022dfb553cd

The diff shows that a vote for 1:27 was removed. Do you wanna guess who 1:27 is?

Not sure why you would cover it up or deny it...

Anyway, you are right about deciding important things by voting in the end. Thing is that "how to handle poll and their threshold" is a very important thing, and as that it should have been voted on! But no, there was no vote about changing the current rule for it, nor any discussion!

I would have started accepting and applying BSIP76 if 1) the rule about "how to handle poll and their threshold" was put to a vote and approved, or 2) if the relative poll-worker were above the current refund threshold.

I understand that 1) takes time, but why couldn't you guys go for 2)?
Obtain support from other proxies (as openledger or beos) to respect the current rule, get the worker-poll above the threshold, and ask witnesses to apply community will. Doesn't sound that difficult. If it was too much difficult, then that means there was no community agreement.

I am sorry if I did not tell the fact, I really had a bad memory. I am not intended to tell lies.
I voted your witness, anyway, one witness that focus on principles and rules worth appreciation.

in our(abit, I and also most of the China community) view, this action is a little urgent, we do not want to see it fall in the trap of low efficiency and bureaucracy.

I really feel we need a new rule on how to handle poll and their threshold, it's reluctant to request a poll to overcome refund400K. and there's no time to develop a new rule at this urgent scenario.

also in my view, most of the witnesses support the action because they know this action get big support from the community and the poll worker surely can be regarded as pass, not, or not only because cn-vote show their muscle.