Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 127
1

I've added new metrics
https://blocksights.info/#/pools

Right now the calculations are based in BTS (the yield is w.r.t. to BTS value increase/decrease), switching to something stable might make sense since not everyone is a BTS maximalist :)

I feel BTS is OK, the key point is that all the pairs are in the same base, but now it seems the volumes are on different base, all on asset B?

Everything is converted to BTS value using latest market price before calculations. Please let me know if you see strange numbers, and if do, which ones they are.



see above, the numbers marked red are in DEFI, marked green are in USDT, marked blue are in EOS.

and, I feel it's better to put the 24h activity in the main line, as this can tell some useful information and worth to order the pairs within it, and how does the "24h score" are calculated out? 

2

I've added new metrics
https://blocksights.info/#/pools

Right now the calculations are based in BTS (the yield is w.r.t. to BTS value increase/decrease), switching to something stable might make sense since not everyone is a BTS maximalist :)

I feel BTS is OK, the key point is that all the pairs are in the same base, but now it seems the volumes are on different base, all on asset B?

3
I added liquidity pools as well here https://blocksights.info/#/pools

The overview will be extended and more data displayed, any feedback welcome.

it will be great if you can add the 24h trading volume in the list.
it will be even more great if you can add the DEFI APY to the pairs that BTSDAO airdrop to.

Can you elaborate how to calculate that APY?

the latest airdrop rule is:

the pairs that accept DEFI airdrop are classified as 2 groups:

group1: BTS-CNY, BTS-USD, BTS-EUR, BTS-DEFI

group2:CNY-USD, CNY/CNC, BTS-GDEX.USDT, DEFI-GDEX.USDT

the airdrop happens at each "prime day" in China lunar calendar, for example, in April the airdrop will happen at 4th, 10th, 13th, 14th,16th, 18th,22rd, 24th,28th 30th, because these days are listed as 23, 29, 2,3,5,7,11,13,17, 19 in China lunar calendar, airdrop depend on the snapshot at UTC 12:00 at that day.

each time, each pair in group1 will be airdroped 300K DEFI to the LP token holders, each pair in group2 will be airdroped 150K DEFI to the LP token holders.

so we can suppose the airdrop happens every 3 days, you can get LP token amounts, asset A amounts, asset B amounts at the snapshot time for each pairs in group1/group2.

then APY for one pair = DEFI airdrop amount(300K or 150K)*365/3/(asset A amounts*2*price of A in DEFI)

as I know the rule will be updated in recent future, I'll ask the BTSDAO guys to share the latest rule ASAP.

4
I added liquidity pools as well here https://blocksights.info/#/pools

The overview will be extended and more data displayed, any feedback welcome.

it will be great if you can add the 24h trading volume in the list.
it will be even more great if you can add the DEFI APY to the pairs that BTSDAO airdrop to.

5
中文(Chinese) / Re: 测试网版本 test-5.0.0
« on: March 11, 2021, 06:36:52 am »
AMM 流量池相关操作 ( cli_wallet 命令 和 API )

1. 建池

op code: 59

参数
Code: [Select]
fee                     手续费,测试网默认手续费 50 TEST
account                 账号,格式 1.2.x
asset_a                 资产A,格式 1.3.x
asset_b                 资产B,格式 1.3.x
share_asset             权益资产(即LP TOKEN),格式 1.3.x
taker_fee_percent       交易手续费,整数表示,单位是万分之一
withdrawal_fee_percent  提现手续费,整数表示,单位是万分之一

注:
* 资产 A 的 ID 必须小于资产 B 的 ID
* 建池必须绑定权益资产,只有权益资产持有人才能绑定,且自动成为池主
* 权益资产必须预先建好,不能是AB之一,必须是普通UIA,不能有存量

貌似池子创建者可以获得maker fee分成?这个费率是在哪里设置的?

6
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Member]:bitcrab
« on: October 01, 2020, 11:08:52 am »
please unvote bitcrab.

it's so shamed to be a so called "committee member" of a blockchain which is controlled by a single person.

7
Stakeholder Proposals / [POLL]BAIP10 : Set Margin Call Fee Ratio
« on: September 02, 2020, 09:12:30 am »
Below polls are created to set margin call parameters for bitCNY, bitUSD and bitEUR:

For bitCNY:

1.14.282 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitCNY MCFR to 1% and MSSR 1.02
1.14.285 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitCNY MCFR and MSSR unchanged

For bitUSD:

1.14.283 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitUSD MCFR to 1% and MSSR 1.02
1.14.286 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitUSD MCFR and MSSR unchanged

For bitEUR:

1.14.288 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitEUR MCFR to 1%
1.14.287 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitEUR MCFR and MSSR unchanged

According to the BAIP rules, for each bitAsset, the FOR proposal will be considered approved while meeting below 3 criterias:

FOR worker get more voting power than AGAINST worker.
FOR worker get more voting power than BAIP-Threshold Worker.
Both No.1 & 2 above last for three consecutive days.


Here the "Keep parameters unchanged" proposals are the AGAINST proposal, the proposal to set the parameters are FOR proposal, for bitCNY there are 2 FOR proposals and if both are approved the one that get higher voting power will be executed.

please check https://github.com/bitshares/baips/issues/38 to get the detail of BAIP10 and check https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0074.md if you need a deep understanding on that.

Please vote according to your opinion.

8
中文(Chinese) / 强清开始收费
« on: August 29, 2020, 04:04:19 am »
自8月26日起,bitCNY,bitUSD,bitEUR强清均开始向强清方收取1%的费用,从强清方应获取的BTS里扣除,请周知。

9
投票的规则很简单,有人非要争我也懒得解释。我就说说这东西的作用。

问题:在喂价尚不能解锁,价格也没有到threshold之上的情况下,有什么方法能抑制强清?

强清补偿之所以对抑制强清没什么用,因为无论怎么增大强清补偿,强清者的买价和被强清者的卖价都是是一样的,一个玩家借了bitCNY去强清别人,就算自己又被强清了,也基本上没亏损,而他却又很大的机会拿BTS高价卖出套利。

提高强清补偿只是让大家换了了价位交易,顺便让bitCNY贬值得更多一些。

那么设个强清费用呢?

那就不一样了。

就象现在这样设个1%,那就意味着强清者的买价是0.2266,而被强清者的卖价是0.22449,中间有1%的价差,借了bitCNY去强清别人,如果自己被强清了那是有亏损的,通过强清套利需要更好的机会和更精确的算计,这对强清的抑制是显而易见的。

市场价格到了0.22之后,强清费用依然能起到类似的作用。

一会儿骂抵押的耍无赖,一会儿又说抵押的是猪仔,不知道该怎么评价这种精神分裂症。

之所以设1%这样的费率,也正是根据“明显能起到作用,但又不很痛”的原则。




10
3 proposals are there waiting for approval, if it will be approved, CNY,USD and EUR force settlement will all charge 1% fee after 26th, Aug.



relevant poll details please check here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32565.0

11
actually I do not like the words style of Thul3, it's easy to find lies in his words, and if he do not like one people, the one will be the worst in the world under his words.

even though, I hope the Administrator of this forum can release him to post freely.

12


proposal has been created to set the parameters, committee members, could you please approve it?

13
建议公会支持解锁喂价。

14
Quote
目前,巨蟹已经发布了BAIP投票,我们呼吁各投资者尽快投票,以尽快形成社区共识。


在抵押杠杆票权,贿选组织没有被彻底剔除之前,所谓的社区共识不过是一句屁话!

在公平的票权基础没有确立厘清之前,我不会参与这样的投票,同时建议其它投资者也不要参与这样的投票,当你参与了这种投票就等于默认了这种不公平性与作弊。

一个抵押杠杆票权可以通过无数种方式继续放大,无论是锁喂价,黑天鹅保护,还是降低MCR,还是可能存在的爆仓保险,花样只有你想不到,如果社区继续默认这种票权方式存在是合理的话,那我无话可说。

After removed the vote power of leverage collateral, removed the organization of the vote buying,then let's find out the consensus.

Fighting for the cn-vote=Fighting for the vote power of leverage collateral=Fighting for the vote buying,these have essentially different with the fighting for the community!

Before the fair vote foundation didn't make clear, i will not participate in this kind vote to find out a base consensus, and i suggest other shareholders don't participate in this kind vote, when you participate in this kind vote that mean you accepte this kind of unfairness and cheat.

The vote power of leverage collateral can balloon with many ways, lock the feed price, black swan protection, lower the MCR, or the insurance of margin call,  only you can not think,if the community still think this vote power of leverage collateral is reasonable, please forget all what i have said, let the future to show.

@abit 我很想知道一下,这是不是也是你的态度?

15


now only few voters have voted, and all the 4 features get more support than against voting powers.

hope every voters, especially big proxies to vote to show your opinion.

do not wait after 20th, no one is sure what will happen in 20th.

and either fork or not, I believe the current chain need a Plan C.


These vote can't say anything:

This is the vote power now, let the data talk:

beos:          70.0M
baozi:         53.3M
B-DEX:        47.5M
CN-VOTE:    237.0M

70+53.3+47.5=171-237=-66

171+237=408

The vote power of CN-VOTE is 237.0M, only have 30M BTS is not leveraged collateral.

Fair vote?

大螃蟹上午回了又删了,我本想接着那个思路回一下,既然删了就算了,但是我们可以再举一个简单的例子来解释或者什么一下: 为什么抵押票权与挂单票权必须要割掉。

比如我是威且科技的一个小股东,可以在公司抵押我的股权从公司借出资金,且还享有表决权,然后再从股市或者其它小股东手里收购公司股票,再抵押给公司借出资金,大螃蟹你做为这个公司老板是不是要疯?等到我的杠杆表决权可以独断的时候,直接让公司不可以爆我的仓位,那么大老板心里是不是要MMP? 如果所有股东都这样搞表决权的话,那公司还需要发展吗?其它不愿意这样参与的股东是不是打心底里有分家的想法?

再退一步讲,我不在本公司抵押而是在外部做抵押,然后回购公司股票做杠杆,只要表决权不灭失,我想大螃蟹你作为这个公司的老板心里也要无限MMP吧?!

至于为什么挂单票权也要割掉,都挂着单子要卖了,很明显是前脚投票后脚跑路的节奏,这对于一个DAO治理有何意义?!

至于猴子,将来你是想跟着cn-vote这些人不断把杠杆加上去去抗衡抵押票权呢,还是等着他们抵押票权高到可以独断的时候,一个激动直接锁到10块,抵押筹码不丢还能干你?

至于其它,我实在是搞不清楚,一个1.7亿实打实持有bts的票仓有何怕的?...所有的东西都站不住脚...这么多独立见证人难道还不如一个组织控制的贿选见证人体系, 现在就可以这样横着把独立见证人体系干掉,将来岂不是要渡劫上天?!


再者,真的是多说无益,既然关键矛盾不可调和,赶紧×了算完,这种票权结构之下,谈个毛的共识。

作为我个人来说,现在的投票规则并非不可接受,但我并不认为是非常合理的。

如果一个公司上市了,有投资者借钱买股票获得投票权,我想谁都得认,如果想让公司少受投资人影响,不上市就行了呗,学学任老板。

事实上,我觉得锁仓票权+抵押票权也许可以刚好互相平衡,如果说过去曾经有抵押票权罔顾整体利益,那么如果完全取消了抵押票权,谁来代表抵押者的权益?以后抵押者是不是可以被尽情欺负了?

对了,你给出的那几个大户票权应该不准确,先搞准确了。

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 127