The liquidity mining rule will be adjusted as below from 7th Aug:

TradingPairGroup                   Buy-Sell Reward Ratio  Fee Return Ratio  Pair Top Reward  Gear Goal Depth  Minimum Effective OrderVolume   
GroupA(BTS/gateway.assets)              7:3                              30                      4K BTS                400K BTS               100BTS
GroupB(BTS/bitEUR,bitRUBLE)            8:2                              10                       4K                      400K                     100BTS
GroupC(gateway.assets/bitAssets)      5:5                              10                      4K                       400K         0.0001BTC/2USDT/0.01ETH/1EOS
GroupD(BTS/bitCNY,bitUSD)              10:0                              4                       10K                     1M                        100BTS
GroupE(bitEUR/USDT)                       5:5                                5                       4K                       400K                     100BTS
Group A each day share at most 20KBTS reward
Group B and D each day share at most 20KBTS reward
Group C and E each day share at most 20KBTS reward

Operator will get 500BTS as payment everyday, this amount may be adjusted when BTS price change greatly, however, operator can only get 100% payment while finishing the job(create proposal and submit post in bitsharestalk.org)before UTC 12:00, get 50% while finishing the job before UTC 24:00, and 0% if later, this pay will not be included in the mining reward proposal, but will be executed individually by committee. 

锁喂价造成的是bitCNY的贬值，和抵押的BTS有毛关系。

你好狗狗。

当锁喂价之下，庞大的虚假投票权出现的时候怎么没有人来质疑共识？！这种虚假票权也是共识？

当随着价格上升抵押票权无限放大的时候，你们扪心自问谁能阻挡这种指数型放大的抵押票权？当他们想再次做作弊喂价的时候谁来维护那些真正bts持有者的利益？谁来维护bitasset持有者的利益？！

反正你喜欢啥就是啥，抵押的票权成了虚假票权，锁一下翻几倍倒是真实票权？

我承认抵押的票权会在态度上有偏见，我也不是不能接受取消抵押票权，但不齿的这种喜欢啥就是啥的态度。

据我所知，由于公会认为abit的改动侵害了公会的利益，也违背了公链的共识，目前正在准备开发patch，将投票机制变化这部分先以patch的方式关掉。

公会的计划是，先去除掉不在开发计划内的功能，然后再按正常流程投票对这几项功能进行取舍，再进行升级。

在我看来，票权衰减，一票一投这两项应该通过概率很大，锁仓也不小，抵押和挂单无票权这两项应该通不过。

既然如此，何不当下就把4项功能分开投票，以作取舍？ @abit

as I know, cn-vote is preparing a patch to remove the unplanned 4 features which are added to 4.0 release, and force witnesses to install.

and then, they will submit vote for the 4 features for the one new release again.

in my view, vote decay, 1 power 1 vote are in high possibility to be passed, deposit lock is also not low, "collateral and order no power" should not be approved.

so why submit the voting for these 4 features immediately?

do not support this, it will hurt a big group one more time.
to optimize the system, firstly need to find a chance to lower the USD threshold to be equal to that of CNY.

I now changed my idea, I'd like to support this kind of proposal.

I have expected that BTS price can be up 0.22CNY without much difficulty. so bitCNY can return to peg naturally, but what happened is not what I expected.

Now although bitCNY has big supply, but it's more like a game.

reducing threshold from 0.22 to 0.154 will hurt debt position owners, but maybe  this is not avoidable, and is better than continuing the offpeg.

we have hurt bitCNY holders for the future of BTS, can't we hurt debt position owners for the same?

actually I don't think it's easy to get enough voting power that support this, maybe it's better to do the same for bitUSD?
 

当前参数：


一种调整参数的设想：

donated 12664 BTS to cn-fund2020, which is the mining income of aaaa-bb from BTS/EUR pair in the first 5 days.

As there are some delay in the reward data verification work, up to now the reward of the first day is not issued yet, please be sure the work will be done soon and the reward of the days from 12th will be issued soon, sorry for the inconvenience.

由于数据验证工作方面出现了一些延迟，直到今天12日的奖励还没有发放，请各位矿工放心，数据验证工作会尽快做好，挖矿开始以来的奖励也会尽快发给大家，对此给大家造成的不便深表歉意。