Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 127
1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Committee Member]:bitcrab
« on: October 01, 2020, 11:08:52 am »
please unvote bitcrab.

it's so shamed to be a so called "committee member" of a blockchain which is controlled by a single person.

2
Stakeholder Proposals / [POLL]BAIP10 : Set Margin Call Fee Ratio
« on: September 02, 2020, 09:12:30 am »
Below polls are created to set margin call parameters for bitCNY, bitUSD and bitEUR:

For bitCNY:

1.14.282 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitCNY MCFR to 1% and MSSR 1.02
1.14.285 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitCNY MCFR and MSSR unchanged

For bitUSD:

1.14.283 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitUSD MCFR to 1% and MSSR 1.02
1.14.286 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitUSD MCFR and MSSR unchanged

For bitEUR:

1.14.288 Poll-BAIP10-Set bitEUR MCFR to 1%
1.14.287 Poll-BAIP10-Keep bitEUR MCFR and MSSR unchanged

According to the BAIP rules, for each bitAsset, the FOR proposal will be considered approved while meeting below 3 criterias:

FOR worker get more voting power than AGAINST worker.
FOR worker get more voting power than BAIP-Threshold Worker.
Both No.1 & 2 above last for three consecutive days.


Here the "Keep parameters unchanged" proposals are the AGAINST proposal, the proposal to set the parameters are FOR proposal, for bitCNY there are 2 FOR proposals and if both are approved the one that get higher voting power will be executed.

please check https://github.com/bitshares/baips/issues/38 to get the detail of BAIP10 and check https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0074.md if you need a deep understanding on that.

Please vote according to your opinion.

3
中文(Chinese) / 强清开始收费
« on: August 29, 2020, 04:04:19 am »
自8月26日起，bitCNY，bitUSD，bitEUR强清均开始向强清方收取1%的费用，从强清方应获取的BTS里扣除，请周知。

4
General Discussion / Re: Please be careful on force settlement as perhaps it will charge fees.
« on: August 25, 2020, 04:38:04 pm »
投票的规则很简单，有人非要争我也懒得解释。我就说说这东西的作用。

问题：在喂价尚不能解锁，价格也没有到threshold之上的情况下，有什么方法能抑制强清？

强清补偿之所以对抑制强清没什么用，因为无论怎么增大强清补偿，强清者的买价和被强清者的卖价都是是一样的，一个玩家借了bitCNY去强清别人，就算自己又被强清了，也基本上没亏损，而他却又很大的机会拿BTS高价卖出套利。

提高强清补偿只是让大家换了了价位交易，顺便让bitCNY贬值得更多一些。

那么设个强清费用呢？

那就不一样了。

就象现在这样设个1%，那就意味着强清者的买价是0.2266，而被强清者的卖价是0.22449，中间有1%的价差，借了bitCNY去强清别人，如果自己被强清了那是有亏损的，通过强清套利需要更好的机会和更精确的算计，这对强清的抑制是显而易见的。

市场价格到了0.22之后，强清费用依然能起到类似的作用。

一会儿骂抵押的耍无赖，一会儿又说抵押的是猪仔，不知道该怎么评价这种精神分裂症。

之所以设1%这样的费率，也正是根据“明显能起到作用，但又不很痛”的原则。




5
General Discussion / Please be careful on force settlement as perhaps it will charge fees.
« on: August 25, 2020, 06:29:18 am »
3 proposals are there waiting for approval, if it will be approved, CNY,USD and EUR force settlement will all charge 1% fee after 26th, Aug.



relevant poll details please check here: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=32565.0

6
General Discussion / Re: thul3 Has been banned from forum by digital lucifer
« on: August 22, 2020, 03:47:02 am »
actually I do not like the words style of Thul3, it's easy to find lies in his words, and if he do not like one people, the one will be the worst in the world under his words.

even though, I hope the Administrator of this forum can release him to post freely.

7
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [POLL]BAIP9 : Set Force Settlement Fee Percent
« on: August 21, 2020, 08:22:41 am »


proposal has been created to set the parameters, committee members, could you please approve it?

8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] Plan C: release new version with the unplanned features processed
« on: August 20, 2020, 01:54:59 am »
建议公会支持解锁喂价。

9
General Discussion / Re: Cn-vote's statement on version 4.0 Upgrade -- to all witne公会关于4.0版本升级的声明——致所有见证人
« on: August 19, 2020, 01:14:55 am »
Quote from: binggo on August 18, 2020, 11:37:35 pm
Quote
目前，巨蟹已经发布了BAIP投票，我们呼吁各投资者尽快投票，以尽快形成社区共识。


在抵押杠杆票权，贿选组织没有被彻底剔除之前，所谓的社区共识不过是一句屁话！

在公平的票权基础没有确立厘清之前，我不会参与这样的投票，同时建议其它投资者也不要参与这样的投票，当你参与了这种投票就等于默认了这种不公平性与作弊。

一个抵押杠杆票权可以通过无数种方式继续放大，无论是锁喂价，黑天鹅保护，还是降低MCR，还是可能存在的爆仓保险，花样只有你想不到，如果社区继续默认这种票权方式存在是合理的话，那我无话可说。

After removed the vote power of leverage collateral, removed the organization of the vote buying，then let's find out the consensus.

Fighting for the cn-vote=Fighting for the vote power of leverage collateral=Fighting for the vote buying，these have essentially different with the fighting for the community！

Before the fair vote foundation didn't make clear, i will not participate in this kind vote to find out a base consensus, and i suggest other shareholders don't participate in this kind vote, when you participate in this kind vote that mean you accepte this kind of unfairness and cheat.

The vote power of leverage collateral can balloon with many ways, lock the feed price, black swan protection, lower the MCR, or the insurance of margin call,  only you can not think，if the community still think this vote power of leverage collateral is reasonable, please forget all what i have said, let the future to show.

@abit 我很想知道一下，这是不是也是你的态度？

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] Plan C: release new version with the unplanned features processed
« on: August 17, 2020, 06:23:56 am »
Quote from: binggo on August 17, 2020, 01:03:19 am
Quote from: bitcrab on August 17, 2020, 12:38:36 am


now only few voters have voted, and all the 4 features get more support than against voting powers.

hope every voters, especially big proxies to vote to show your opinion.

do not wait after 20th, no one is sure what will happen in 20th.

and either fork or not, I believe the current chain need a Plan C.


These vote can't say anything:

This is the vote power now, let the data talk:

beos:          70.0M
baozi:         53.3M
B-DEX:        47.5M
CN-VOTE:    237.0M

70+53.3+47.5=171-237=-66

171+237=408

The vote power of CN-VOTE is 237.0M, only have 30M BTS is not leveraged collateral.

Fair vote?

大螃蟹上午回了又删了，我本想接着那个思路回一下，既然删了就算了，但是我们可以再举一个简单的例子来解释或者什么一下: 为什么抵押票权与挂单票权必须要割掉。

比如我是威且科技的一个小股东，可以在公司抵押我的股权从公司借出资金，且还享有表决权，然后再从股市或者其它小股东手里收购公司股票，再抵押给公司借出资金，大螃蟹你做为这个公司老板是不是要疯？等到我的杠杆表决权可以独断的时候，直接让公司不可以爆我的仓位，那么大老板心里是不是要MMP? 如果所有股东都这样搞表决权的话，那公司还需要发展吗？其它不愿意这样参与的股东是不是打心底里有分家的想法？

再退一步讲，我不在本公司抵押而是在外部做抵押，然后回购公司股票做杠杆，只要表决权不灭失，我想大螃蟹你作为这个公司的老板心里也要无限MMP吧？！

至于为什么挂单票权也要割掉，都挂着单子要卖了，很明显是前脚投票后脚跑路的节奏，这对于一个DAO治理有何意义？！

至于猴子，将来你是想跟着cn-vote这些人不断把杠杆加上去去抗衡抵押票权呢，还是等着他们抵押票权高到可以独断的时候，一个激动直接锁到10块，抵押筹码不丢还能干你？

至于其它，我实在是搞不清楚，一个1.7亿实打实持有bts的票仓有何怕的？...所有的东西都站不住脚...这么多独立见证人难道还不如一个组织控制的贿选见证人体系, 现在就可以这样横着把独立见证人体系干掉，将来岂不是要渡劫上天?!


再者，真的是多说无益，既然关键矛盾不可调和，赶紧×了算完，这种票权结构之下，谈个毛的共识。

作为我个人来说，现在的投票规则并非不可接受，但我并不认为是非常合理的。

如果一个公司上市了，有投资者借钱买股票获得投票权，我想谁都得认，如果想让公司少受投资人影响，不上市就行了呗，学学任老板。

事实上，我觉得锁仓票权+抵押票权也许可以刚好互相平衡，如果说过去曾经有抵押票权罔顾整体利益，那么如果完全取消了抵押票权，谁来代表抵押者的权益？以后抵押者是不是可以被尽情欺负了？

对了，你给出的那几个大户票权应该不准确，先搞准确了。

11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] Plan C: release new version with the unplanned features processed
« on: August 17, 2020, 12:38:36 am »


now only few voters have voted, and all the 4 features get more support than against voting powers.

hope every voters, especially big proxies to vote to show your opinion.

do not wait after 20th, no one is sure what will happen in 20th.

and either fork or not, I believe the current chain need a Plan C.

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [POLL]BAIP9 : Set Force Settlement Fee Percent
« on: August 16, 2020, 09:34:33 am »

13
Stakeholder Proposals / Re:[Poll] Plan C: release new version with the unplanned features processed
« on: August 16, 2020, 08:33:05 am »
Quote from: alt on August 16, 2020, 08:12:27 am
In fact in most condition whether rule A or rule B is not a big deal to me.
What I really concern is the business based on core which make BTS more valuable like gdex\rudex\CNC\magicwallet...
I expected a stable core since years ago, but seems it's still not coming today.

What abit had done is totally not acceptable in my opinion.
But it's already happen. I can accept the changes even some details is not reasonable to me.
The important thing is how to ensure our developer don't do it again.

I don't support fork, it's a disaster to all business based on BTS, what will happen to bitCNY/GDEX.BTC/CNC.. ?
Anybody  will have faith to build business on BTS in the future?
I wish you can resolve disputes, somebody can give a concession,  price will rise, BTS can have a good future.

what abit had done is not acceptable to me either, however I understand why he  do this.

but, it seems in high possibility the fork will happen, not like you, many people in the community think fork is good to BTS, it will lead to free token and price rising.   

I'd like to see the fork can be avoided, but if it really happen, we need to face it.

in my view, either the fork happen or not, we need a new version with removing/keeping/updating what abit added, that's why I suggest this Plan C.

I think this can help BTS to get the faith and reputation back, and also get the senseful voting system evaluation.


14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Poll] Plan C: release new version with the unplanned features processed
« on: August 16, 2020, 08:10:13 am »
Quote from: Thul3 on August 14, 2020, 12:26:32 pm
vote decay          YES
collateral            Not really
DPOS1               YES
Stacking            Never in this form

Way of implementation    Never

possible to vote to tell the community your opinion?

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [POLL]BAIP9 : Set Force Settlement Fee Percent
« on: August 16, 2020, 06:25:23 am »
Quote from: Thul3 on August 16, 2020, 04:38:28 am
Quote
Poll-BAIP9-Set bitCNY FSFP to 1% and FSO to 1%

Not better FSO 0% and FSFP 2% ?

the higher the fee, the more pain to the users, let's begin with a lower one.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 127