Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 93
46
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 26, 2019, 03:01:26 pm »
at the time bitCNY still have premium.

Warning: zbbtsbp, verbaltech2, xeldal, please.




47
Stakeholder Proposals / [Poll] Modify bitEUR parameters
« on: May 26, 2019, 08:22:58 am »
Up to now bitEUR has poor liquidity.

I don't know whether bitEUR can grow up, but I believe we need to give bitEUR a chance, while both bitCNY and bitUSD have experienced changes on parameters, bitEUR also need similar change, otherwise bitEUR will have no chance to compete with bitCNY and bitUSD.

The first poll is on Global Settlement Protection implementation on bitEUR, reference Doc: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0058.md

1.14.192   Poll-BSIP58-Apply GS Protection on bitEUR
   
1.14.193   Poll-BSIP58-Do Not Apply GS Protection on bitEUR

The second poll is on reducing MCR of bitEUR to 1.6, reference Doc:https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0059.md

1.14.194   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MCR of bitEUR to 1.6

1.14.195   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MCR of bitEUR

The third poll is on reducing MSSR of bitEUR to 1.02:

1.14.196   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitEUR to 1.02

1.14.197   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitEUR


Approvement on  "1.14.192 Poll-BSIP58-Apply GS Protection on bitEUR" is the precondition for the other 2 changes to be allowed.

Please vote according to your opinion.


48
投了

49
叙事请专业点,在哪个交易所砸的,从多少砸到了多少,花了多长时间,最好贴图为证。

不然谁知道你在说啥啊,对解决问题又有啥帮助啊

50
A new WP is created to replace the expired 1.14.169:

1.14.191   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01

If you are against to reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01, please vote 1.14.191

I feel there is no short term harm to the market to remain on 1.02 at this time. This value represents the most recent vote which provided both for and against movement.

To reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01 is not to resolve short term issues, it is to prepare for the next down trend.

51
As 1.14.169 expired, a new WP is created to replace it:

1.14.191   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01

If you are against to reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01, please vote 1.14.191

52

584M vs 4xxM. IMHO debatable.

By the way, 1.14.169 and 1.14.175 have same description, especially, no new "no" worker has been created for 1.14.181, voters may got confused. If now create a "no" worker, IMHO we need to extend the voting period.

sorry I wrongly adopted 1.14.175, the updated votes is:

1.14.181   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01            592,218,889
1.14.144   Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05   429,791,729   
1.14.168   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02 .          421,620,749   
1.14.169   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY .           239,878,984   


53
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 23, 2019, 09:01:05 am »
So we would get margin calls on DEX (with 1.01) which would be more expensiv than BTS at regular price on CEX ?

yes, maybe, when all the price is market price and bitCNY has a 1%+ premium.

54
General Discussion / Re: Price Feed Review
« on: May 22, 2019, 02:34:08 pm »
in my view, generally speaking, below are some principles to judge whether a witness feed price well enough.

1. feed price should reflect the price at which the conversion can be done between BTS and the pegged fiat.

2. feed price should be updated frequently enough to reflect the real market price.

3. for smartcoin with enough market depth in trading pair with BTS in DEX, such as bitCNY, feed price should not conflict with the modified DEX price, which means the DEX price plus the smartcoin premium/discount.

55
IMHO it's more reasonable to compare votes of all the related workers:

* 1.14.168 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02,                      834,717,273 votes
* 1.14.144 Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05,            799,257,175 votes
* 1.14.181 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01,                      483,677,666 votes
* 1.14.169 Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY                       243,231,913 votes

Apparently 1.14.168 has the highest support. So my conclusion is we should set the parameter to 1.02.
Even 1.05 has much more support than 1.01

updated votes:
1.14.181   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01            584,525,311   
1.14.144   Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05   434,145,867   
1.14.168   Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02            425,959,411   
1.14.175   Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MCR of bitCNY              26,603,654   

56
Then we should not reuse 1.14.169, but need to create a new worker e.g. "keep MSSR at 1.02".

I don't see any difference.

voters, if you support to reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01, please unvote 1.14.168 and 1.14.144 to eliminate the confusion.

57
中文(Chinese) / Re: bitCNY/bitUSD的进化
« on: May 21, 2019, 02:15:37 pm »
智能货币经济模型:智能货币溢价越高,BTS的上涨动力就越足。

实现路径:

1.根据智能货币的市场深度,在保证大于1的前提下逐步降低MSSR。

2.保障内盘的定价权,喂价不得偏离内盘修正价。

3.内盘增加平多功能,吸引更多的BTS回流内盘抵押,逐步增大抵押BTS占总流通量的比重。


58
IMHO it's more reasonable to compare votes of all the related workers:

* 1.14.168 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02,                      834,717,273 votes
* 1.14.144 Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05,            799,257,175 votes
* 1.14.181 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01,                      483,677,666 votes
* 1.14.169 Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY                       243,231,913 votes

Apparently 1.14.168 has the highest support. So my conclusion is we should set the parameter to 1.02.
Even 1.05 has much more support than 1.01

Agree on that

That's not the correct logic, if you are against to reduce MSSR of bitCNY yo 1.01, please vote and lobby other voters to vote 1.14.169.

59
IMHO it's more reasonable to compare votes of all the related workers:

* 1.14.168 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.02,                      834,717,273 votes
* 1.14.144 Poll-BSIP41-Reduce MSSR of bitCNY from 1.1 to 1.05,            799,257,175 votes
* 1.14.181 Poll - BSIP59 - Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01,                      483,677,666 votes
* 1.14.169 Poll - BSIP59 - Do Not Reduce MSSR of bitCNY                       243,231,913 votes

Apparently 1.14.168 has the highest support. So my conclusion is we should set the parameter to 1.02.


Even 1.05 has much more support than 1.01

1.14.168 does not represent "1.02", it represent the operation of "reduction from 1.05 to 1.02", it lost effect after the reduction is done. now we only need to compare the two WPs - "reduce from 1.02 to 1.01" and "Do Not Reduce".

60
中文(Chinese) / Re: cn-vote投票公示
« on: May 21, 2019, 04:03:16 am »
感觉确实可以考虑组建中国团队自己做。

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 93