Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitcrab

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 76
46
反弹期就是消化爆仓单的最好时机,而按照本帖帖主alt的建议,见证人应该让喂价比市场价低2%,这样才能让爆仓单尽可能处于“卖一”的位置,买盘可以直接吃爆仓单而不是吃其他正常的卖单。对于已经爆仓的人来说是很痛苦,但是在反弹的时候在相对高的价格被吃掉然后平仓要比创新低之后在更低的价格被吃掉要损失小吧?!除非,你们真的以为牛市来了。

如果你们认为负反馈喂价是价格操纵,那有为何不认为喂比市场价低2%的价格是价格操纵。


47
Look at it this way: I have 1 CNY and I want 1 CNY worth of BTS.

If we put bitCNY settlement mechanism in the middle of this, 1 CNY will get me X bitCNY and 1.05 * X bitCNY will get me 1 CNY worth of BTS.

Thus X <1 -> premium

Essentially work backwards... I think settlement is affecting the market more than the market affects settlement at this juncture.

sure, any time 1CNY will get 1CNY worth of BTS, whether there is bitCNY or not.

we have seen 1bitCNY = 0.95-1.2 CNY when offset = 5%, the offset do not determine the premium. it just make sure premium >-5% supposing feed price = market price.

48
I seriously think it's time to return settlement offset to 1% and I believe it will also play a part in reducing bitCNY premium

(as well as bringing consistency among bitAssets)

no, it will help to reduce discount if there is, helpless to reduce premium.

I believe bitCNY market is now in a state where it works in the opposite way.

0.95 of bitCNY value (i.e. what it can be settled for) is considered = 1 CNY and thus traders are trading 1 bitCNY as >1+ CNY leading to premium.

IMHO that is part of the reason why bitCNY over the last couple of months prior to BSIP42 always had a greater premium than other bitAssets.

5% offset  make 1.05bitCNY considered 1 CNY if feed price = market price.

49
I seriously think it's time to return settlement offset to 1% and I believe it will also play a part in reducing bitCNY premium

(as well as bringing consistency among bitAssets)

no, it will help to reduce discount if there is, helpless to reduce premium.

50
General Discussion / Re: Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 09:29:48 am »
Which version client are you guys using?

2.0.181010

Please, can you try latest 2.0.181212-rc1 ?

same issue, from 2.0.181010 upwards

51
General Discussion / Re: Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 08:56:13 am »
Which version client are you guys using?

2.0.181010

52
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 20, 2018, 08:51:14 am »
this is a poll with 2 worker proposals, not a budget based worker proposal.

here the essential point is which WP get more voting power, not whether the WP become active.

53
General Discussion / Re: Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 04:00:40 am »
the Bitshares network is so bad in the past several days, always cost several mins to open a page!

what cause this? API servers are degraded? GUI bugs?
check how many accounts exist in your wallet.
if there are many strange account, it's a bug of GUI which I have met several days ago, it consider any accounts with the same address as your account, and subscribe too many data from api server.

thanks, yes it is this issue, I haven't seen the strange accounts but everything is well when I switch to my another wallet...

54
General Discussion / Why the BTS network status is so bad these days?
« on: December 20, 2018, 03:26:47 am »
the Bitshares network is so bad in the past several days, always cost several mins to open a page!

what cause this? API servers are degraded? GUI bugs?


55
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 19, 2018, 02:22:08 pm »
The POLL is NO CONSENSUS.

You are BREAKING ALL RULES AS WITNESS !!!!!!

You have no right to change MSSR without creating a worker which will get voted in.

I will make sure that all witnesses which will change MSSR without a REAL community consensus will lose their voters.

he is talking about the on-chain poll

I know the NO BSIP42 is a clear signal to stop manipulation and that people want the margin to get eaten.What he is doing now is not changing price feed and lowering the MSSR back to 105% so margins won't be eaten anymore.
Also he is the only bigger proxy voting for BSIP41 so i doubt this is real consensus.

margin call orders are there at the top for long time, if bitCNY holders want to eat, they had done, if they won't, no need always let the margin call orders press the price and create high bitCNY premium.

bitcrab has only about 30M voting power, everyone can know whether I am the only big proxy to support bsip41.

56
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] gdex-witnness
« on: December 19, 2018, 09:40:16 am »
as in the Poll of bsip41 - worker proposals  1.14.144 and 1.14.155, far more voting power support to implement bsip41, gdex-witness plan to feed 1.05 as MSSR for bitCNY in 2 days.

bsip41: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

57
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 19, 2018, 08:02:34 am »
I will support reduce MSSR to 105% even 102% if the  feed price are reliable.
but in fact many witness still given unreasonable feed price after bsip42 have been voted out for many days.
and most of the proxies are connive these witness,
without a reliable feed price, I don't know what's the meaning to talk about MSSR.

if you support it I hope you can vote.

how to ensure the balance of demand and supply on bitCNY will be a long lasting topic, I understand that bsip42 has big flaws so many people hate it,  but how about dynamic MCR? I can say nothing if this is also refused.

anyway, let's do not discuss this topic on this thread, reducing MSSR to 105% for bitCNY is an old suggestion even before bsip42(so it has a bsip#41), as now bitCNY return to high premium and serious shortage again. in this status I think bsip41 is what we have most consensus. at least it can help to reduce the bitCNY premium without doing harm.


58
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 01:28:24 pm »
as the title tell.

With real price feed?

this is an independent suggestion, irrelevant to how price is fed.
it's meaningless if the witness still give random feed price instead of real market price.

I just mean this poll voting does not cover that topic, actually there is another poll - the no bsip42 poll cover whether the witnesses should feed market price.

BTW, currently the ecosystem suffer bitCNY shortage and high premium mostly.

59
General Discussion / Re: how about reduce MSSR to 105% for bitCNY?
« on: December 18, 2018, 12:37:30 pm »
Forum polls are easily manipulated, stop using them - use the worker proposal voting mechanism instead or ask the committee directly to debate the idea.

I really don't see how this is beneficial, it comes off as pandering to bad debt holders.

please check worker proposals 1.14.144 and 1.14.145

and the drafted bsip: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

60
I am sorry that I made a mistake.

I created 2 worker proposals - 1.14.144 and 1.14.145 for the poll of BSIP41- reduce MSSR from 1.1 to 1.05, but I wrongly put this thread at the link.

the actual BSIP41 link: https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0041.md

the BSIP41 discussion thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27596.0

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 76