Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - alt

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 189
1
中文 (Chinese) / BTS账号免费网站收藏 link.coolguy.vip
« on: August 28, 2026, 10:26:18 am »
https://link.coolguy.vip
本站使用著名的网址收藏开源项目 linkding 搭建。
认证系统基于标准的 nginx auth_request 模块。
使用 BTSBots 的OAuth 代理 biz_proxy 接入。
所有BTS账号免注册,免密码,一键登入。

biz_proxy 位于 btsbots 的 python 客户端,除了 nginx,所有网站都能通过它轻松接入 BTS 账号系统。

2
中文 (Chinese) / coolguy.vip 域名商城打折热卖中
« on: August 22, 2026, 12:44:23 pm »
欢迎来到 https://coolguy.vip 选购你喜欢的域名和邮箱!
现在3折出售中,一个域名只要300BTS!
免注册,使用BTSBots OAuth 扫码登陆,使用 BTSBots 支付网关快捷支付!
支付完成,域名和邮箱实时生效,投入使用!

关于 BTSBots的OAuth和支付网关接入的文档,正在整理中。

3
中文 (Chinese) / 我已经找到了BTS的崛起之路
« on: August 20, 2026, 11:39:29 am »
论坛的朋友们,我已经找到了BTS的崛起之路。
有兴趣的朋友请密切关注BTSBots项目
接下去我会一步步给出答案
请大家拭目以待
这次的终点绝不是什么虚拟币泡沫,而是彻底发掘出BTS真实的价值,让所有人都知道什么是BTS。

4
中文 (Chinese) / BTSBots 钱包发布
« on: August 20, 2026, 09:18:31 am »
BTSBots钱包发布。
访问 https://wallet.btsbots.com
需要更新 python 客户端: https://github.com/pch957/btsbots

web端无密钥,不需要注册,OTP直接登陆。
支持收款账号白名单、收款码、扫码支付、锁屏、订单记录。







5
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 重开 btsbots.com
« on: August 16, 2026, 05:17:28 am »
python 客户端已发布,可以登录了
https://github.com/pch957/btsbots

现在可以在浏览器下单,转账还没加好。

6
中文 (Chinese) / 重开 btsbots.com
« on: August 12, 2026, 06:54:25 am »
重开 btsbots.com
这次的重新设计,使得 btsbots.com 拥有和中心交易平台一样甚至更高的灵活度,同时具备和冷钱包同等的安全级别。

web端差不多可以正常使用了
用户登陆要再等几天,等我把 python 网关整理好发布。

系统是免注册的,服务器和web端不接触任何bitshares私钥。
用户在本地使用开源的 python 网关经私钥签名后登陆系统,获取otp一次性登陆密码后,在web端登陆。
web端登陆后会生成 web crypto 密钥,获得 python 网关代理的授权,之后就可以使用此密钥签名,请求python网关代理签名广播交易。
web crypto是浏览器直接支持的签名api,只能签名,私钥不对外暴露,保证了python网关授权的安全通信。
另外python网关有审计配置文件,设有公钥授权白名单、转账白名单,交易市场白名单等进一步的安全保证机制。


7
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 04, 2020, 11:11:11 am »
I agree this could be a security threat, and your advice is a possible choice, we can make a comunity consensus by voting.

I agree all these things are ridiculous.
I think it's not a big deal to change to another official github address if we have enough vote power.

I tend to agree it is the only way to save this project is to change official github. To protect existing and future businesses from one man dictatorship that happens now.
Also, it would be good move to change "official" dns to bitshares.exchange from bitshares.org.
We have at least 2 reason to support this
1) .org dns belongs to Milos that numerous times threat our gateway, and he has plan to filter it,



also he was manager of the core that brought trojan in the 4.0 release, and he publicly supported broke of consensus



2) bitshares.exchange the dns name that was bought by the community and belong to the community, so the community already spent money to obtain it, and now the correct time to use it

8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 04, 2020, 08:41:08 am »
是不是太自以为是了,怎么和你关注点不同就是选择性失明了
同一个事情,你觉得自己是BTS救星,铁腕改革,我看你是玩过家家胡闹,谁看谁都是失明的。


seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.
It's not gossip but public info.
You're free to choose to ignore them anyway, it is called "Selective blindness" (选择性失明).
Wish you good luck.

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 03, 2020, 10:37:18 pm »
seems it's off topic far away,
I'm not interested in those gossip.
I can see rudex's effort from the order book in the past weeks,
Wish rudex could stay with Bitshares.

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 03, 2020, 02:57:23 am »
不知道你是真傻还是装傻,还在幻想你口中所谓的 business person 来拯救你。
CryptoBridge OpenLedger SparkDEX 给的教训还不够吗?还有 Deex 之流就不说了。

就算掰开手指数现在还在 BitShares 的公司机构,
也要先看 Move Institute , XBTS , ioBanker , 甚至 BEOS 。
什么时候轮得到 RuDEX ? RuDEX 根本都不是注册公司。

RuDEX 有关联开发团队不假。社区出钱开发的btspp手机钱包,他换个皮就是自己的了。申请一个 UI worker 拿了一百万多万没做完。后来又想申请 core worker 拿钱,我说你先提交点代码让我看看,结果没声了。回头变成我不放权?

你的聪明才智哪里去了?一个 Thule 天天在你耳边吹风,就只有他说的才是真话?
不说别的。他说锁喂价好你就支持锁喂价。 RuDEX 完全是反对锁喂价的,他有没有和你说?
他天天黑巨蟹你没听见过?还幻想巨蟹和他和RuDEX合作。
醒醒。

记得当初锁喂价是你提出的,怎么在你这变成thule了?
我代理给thule是因为社区里他思想比较开放,能听进各方的意见,也有自己的主见,即使他很多观念跟我不同我也从没威胁他迎合我。
解不解锁喂价都有道理,问题在于怎么执行。
市价跌破0.22,很多人爆仓单一直不主动调仓,在内盘规则为锁喂价的情况下,包括我在内的一些人,借出CNY,按0.22价格把爆仓单清了,你隔天马上解锁,号称要恢复锚定,反把这些仓位给爆了,这算什么事?
有人说不解锁对CNY持有人不公平。问题是CNY持有人在明知有锁喂价的情况下,在BTS市价高于0.22,有足够时间换人民币的情况下,仍然选择持有CNY,这难道不该自担风险?按规则0.22借CNY 的反而成老赖了?
解锁喂价没问题,但一定是在市价高于0.22的时候做,把影响降到最低,这点你能不清楚?

对smart coin, 很早我就说过自己的观点,不该强求锚定,重心要转为支持网关等业务,基于网关的DEX相对CEX是有足够的竞争资本的,在业务增加用户积累之后,smart coin自然会成长不断进步。
openledger 为什么离开我不清楚,社区有几个派别我也看不懂,很多时候是斗的你死我活,也不知道是为了什么,rudex一直在积极推动内盘市场,我当然支持,很多人对锁喂价有不同意见很正常,为什么不能给与理解。
巨蟹是陷到 smartcoin 精确锚定的牛角尖,可能也是因为这个和社区很多人关系紧张,回过头想想很不值得,可能是在舍本逐末。

11
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 02, 2020, 01:18:13 pm »
We've observed and supported this project for the last four years. But the last events that happened force us to do this step.
We can't tolerate github abuse from one core dev
We can't tolerate trojan that was delivered by audit worker
We can't tolerate broke of consensus that was publicly acknowledged by core manager Milos
We can't tolerate the staking mechanism that was enforced with 0 discussions and completely changed consensus and voting behavior
The staking problem that was implemented with no discussion and I guess without any modulation is that it's not scalable and it hit hard by "voting apathy" because you have no intention in staking, you gain nothing besides the "governance drama"
The "abit precedent" vanished any trust in the current blockchain consensus & witnesses and operating on it can be just not safe.
Even if everyone starts to play with his staking rules what guarantee we have that he will not abuse github again and broke consensus again? This is a rhetorical question.

We saw attempts that was blocked, abit refused give up his position in github and after his abuse I have no reason to work with dev with such ethics, so I don't understand how you plan to put someone besides him there?

I agree all these things are ridiculous.
I think it's not a big deal to change to another official github address if we have enough vote power.
The real problem is it seems we are lack of reliable development team always, a team which truly serve the business.

I wish the business person include you and bitcrab and others can have more comunication, if you can reach a consensus, I will support with my vote.

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« on: October 02, 2020, 02:31:29 am »
It's so bad to see you decide to step away too.
I respect you and wish you have a good process.

But if it's possible, May I  ask you to stay with Bitshares for more time?
Too many big argument the community have made recent years, but they are not a big deal indeed compare today.
People come and go, Bitshares is still here, you should stay with it if you still have faith in it.

You have development team, please step in the core development work.
Your business is the exchange gateway, pay more attention to the crypto asset instead of smart coin.
we can have more opportunity if we stay together than fork alone.

I still have faith in Bitshares, wish you too.

After abit trojan took place yesterday we've stopped our witness infrastructure for bitshares.

We have a capable team of core and UI devs, so we're preparing a fork of bitshares code base, back to the consensus rules that was before the abit abuse on github.
It will be a new distribution, a new chain, and a new genesis.
 
News will come latter with announcements.

13
General Discussion / Re: Old BitCNY MSSR updated to 150%, ICR 225%
« on: October 01, 2020, 09:25:49 am »
Thanks for the PM and post.

I didn't know the rules can be manipulate like a child game.
And I can't find another reason for this change.
All the debt holders borrow CNY and spent it depend on the official rule,
and all the CNY holders buy CNY depend on it too,
All the debt holder can pay debt when price over 0.22CNY and all the CNY holder can sell CNY at 1 CNY yuan price too.
I guess the reason for this manipulate definitely not for the shorter or the CNY holder or BTS system.

And In fact I can do nothing to reduce the loss,
Whenever how many collateral I add, I can be margin call without any cent left, by change the MCR & MSSR.
so I am ready to lose all the collateral 54,545,455.00 BTS

Take care, every BTS traders.

so you kill bitcny to

Quote
改参数是在围剿猴哥吗
encircle monkey brother ?

You are killing bitcny and making many people a big loss on purpose in hope people like alt can't use much bts for stacking?

You are a criminal and nothing more


Next step forking out someones asset you don't like ?


For peoples attention


Parameters bitcny

ICR 225%
MCR Unknown
MSSR 150%


Parameters for his cny1.0

ICR 175%
MCR 175%
MSSR 110%


Now tell me based on these two parameters abit is not killing bitcny on purpose and causing knowingly many people to lose big money.

Thats a clear criminal act.

The best part he won't announce even the new MCR but just change it when he wants to.

14
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 5.0 (2020-09-30)
« on: September 23, 2020, 03:02:12 am »
BTW, the operation of lock BTS is a good feature,
we should give more rights to the locked shares, for example airdrop the fees income to them.
and  I encourage vote for the witness who have locked more BTS first.

remove the voting power of liquility BTS is a big change, but it's reasonable and acceptable to me, so I will support it.
but we'd best keep enough time for the transition period to prevent abuse of voting power.

I support this update, but we have to obey the consensus by voting, so I have created a poll(ID:289/290), please consider voting for it.

15
General Discussion / Re: BitShares 5.0 (2020-09-30)
« on: September 23, 2020, 02:53:48 am »
remove the voting power of liquility BTS is a big change, but it's reasonable and acceptable to me, so I will support it.
but we'd best keep enough time for the transition period to prevent abuse of voting power.

I support this update, but we have to obey the consensus by voting, so I have created a poll(ID:289/290), please consider voting for it.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 189