61
Marketplace / Re: 200 PTS - BOUNTY - Import wallet.dat Private Keys via API call (2 PTS Referral)
« on: January 19, 2014, 12:05:58 pm »do I understand correctly that wallet.dat is a Berkeley database file?
Yes it is.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Yes it is.
62
MemoryCoin / [CHA] Selling MMC for charity
« on: January 18, 2014, 11:40:29 am »
Community,
if you need additional MMC funds, please help the charity award and buy from me. I will sell in 1 BTC batches at current market prices, but dont want to dump the coins on Bter to avoid a landslide
Thanks for your support,
donSchoe
PS - See also:
Charity collection suggestions thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2359.0
My proposal for charity award: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1879.0
if you need additional MMC funds, please help the charity award and buy from me. I will sell in 1 BTC batches at current market prices, but dont want to dump the coins on Bter to avoid a landslide
Thanks for your support,
donSchoe
PS - See also:
Charity collection suggestions thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2359.0
My proposal for charity award: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1879.0
63
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: January 18, 2014, 11:30:05 am »Hello,
i stay two days mining on the pool. I have a FX8350 with 8gb ram, minimg 120collision/min. I see on the forums that people with this processor and ram makes 250collision/min.
I utilize v0.7 with windows 8.1 64 bits.
Config:
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph
Any idea to improve?
thanks
Run with avx.
ptsminer_amd.exe USER 8 27 sph >> ptsminer_avx_amd.exe USER 8 27 avx
I'm a noob, but I tought AVX is intel cpus only?
64
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 18, 2014, 11:11:55 am »I was aiming originally for CPU only and it seems I was more successful than others that have gone before me, but not perfectly.Could you explain that a little more? What is the problem creating a coin that can only be mined by CPU?
Your answer sounds like it's impossible to create a CPU-only coin, because you have tried to and put a high bounty on what you thought was the solution. Why didn't you know what others (GPU miner creators) now know when you were programming it?
Knowing how the GPU miners work, could you create a CPU only coin now?
Well there is a successfull CPU only coin out there: Primecoin, stable for more than half a year now and impossible to create GPU miners with decent results due to the design of prime numbers being integers
It's so simple tbh.
66
MemoryCoin / Re: [Charity] Spices (Malaysia) - Charity accepting MMCs directly!
« on: January 16, 2014, 10:25:13 am »WOW!
I see that someone just donated them 3,333 MMCs, is that you, donschoe?
Very nice of you, community
http://www.mmc-chain.com/?engine=blockexplorer&address=MVTEchaqyCuu8RsP5kMYMuTbxRrwZ2jmtQ
Well done.
Charities are missing out here... I'm trying to wake them up, it's a hard process, even with those that already accept Bitcoins.
This is indeed a very nice donation. I also recieved that. The sender is unknown.
http://www.mmc-chain.com/?engine=blockexplorer&tx=c7f4750985ba6ded922d9b5c121c6649597ac5eaf675c85f92e5d3fbcdc9adc9
Whoever sent that transaction, thank you.
67
MemoryCoin / Re: [ANN][DEVS] 2 new python libraries for app developers
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:49:13 pm »
Indeed, I really start loving our CTO team
68
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] PTS.1GH.COM - GPU mining (Geforce GTX 570 - 960 cpm)
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:45:58 pm »
Here, here, where's the beer?
69
Marketplace / Re: 5 PTS Bounty - Find inconsistency between angelshares.info and agsexplorer.com
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:44:57 pm »this thread is misleading, bytemaster.
you issued AGS, and you should define how donations from multiple input addresses are handled.
of course i could take the time to write down detailled documentation on the algorithm, but to be honest, it would be better to announce how it will be.
after that me and the fluxxer can adjust their algorithms to fit the defined allocation procedure.
The algorithm I defined was that the first input address of every transaction should be the one allocated the AGS.
Define "first". Isnt that too random? What about the input address with highest input?
If all addresses belong to the same person then it doesn't matter which one is picked so long as it is deterministic. First is deterministic, there may be two addresses with the same input amount.
Okay, right, I will think about that. I got to rewrite the API to match this. I hope this wont cause confusion.
* donschoe pokes angelshares.info guys
The ags.info site must use the same algorithm too. How to ensure both sites pick the same first input address? Is the daemon always reporting the same input as "first"?
70
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Mining and the market price of PTS
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:42:30 pm »By all appearances, GPUs have had a negligible impact on net processing power. We're still set to drop next difficulty change.
http://mrx.im/pts.php
Also, I think you have the answer in your post: your 18 MH rig is making you less than $100/day on PTS, while you could almost certainly be making more than that mining, well, scrypt.
Why would I mine PTS with an AMD GPU? NVidia is a different story, but again, it does not appear to have affected much.
Anyway, if we believe in what's going on here, we should appreciate this buying opportunity, right?
Yeah why waste GPUs if there is still Cachecoin
71
Meta / Re: Inflation made by I3 @bytemaster & co.
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:41:07 pm »
Thanks for the comments on this.
I have to admit, I agree on this one.
And I dont want to cut off this system. It was just a thought.
I have to admit, I agree on this one.
I also believe that those earning PTS by doing work on this forum are unlikely to sell it all and therefore this does not push down prices.
And I dont want to cut off this system. It was just a thought.
72
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:36:27 pm »I mined this pool for more than 2 months, damn no regret!Get this man a drink!
Get THIS man a drink, damn!
Edit:
73
BitShares PTS / Re: Why is ypool destroying PTS? (70% mined by ypool)
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:35:53 pm »I am also worried, but the earning in ypool is indeed the best, for which people can't resist. By the way, the fee of Ypool has been reduced to 5%Sorry but: lies
Its one of the most distributed myths in here. Ypool payouts are intransparent and low. Tell me, how much value has a share at ypool?
Only the owner knows ...
74
Marketplace / Re: 5 PTS Bounty - Find inconsistency between angelshares.info and agsexplorer.com
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:34:06 pm »this thread is misleading, bytemaster.
you issued AGS, and you should define how donations from multiple input addresses are handled.
of course i could take the time to write down detailled documentation on the algorithm, but to be honest, it would be better to announce how it will be.
after that me and the fluxxer can adjust their algorithms to fit the defined allocation procedure.
The algorithm I defined was that the first input address of every transaction should be the one allocated the AGS.
Define "first". Isnt that too random? What about the input address with highest input?
75
Meta / Inflation made by I3 @bytemaster & co.
« on: January 15, 2014, 10:29:45 pm »
I'm posting this in to the internal forums for various reasons, there is enough chitchat going on already. But I have some concerns about bounties and rewards paid in PTS.
I like the way you use bounties to push forward the community and everything you ever desired. But during the last few days/weeks i noted some inflation.
Everyone sees PTS going down. I'm not worried, 1 PTS is still 1 PTS. But if I see posts like the following I'm concerned.
The monthly budget for volunteers helping out on the technical support forum is 300 PTS as of Jan/15/2014.
The monthly donation for board and global moderators helping out everywhere and keep this wheel spinning is 100 PTS as of Jan/02/2014 (link).
Please, everyone understand, I'm not here to complain we get too less. I want you to understand there is huge decrease in value of PTS if we keep blowing out PTS at this rates. 2 weeks ago a budget for a dozen dedicated moderators keeping this forum going was 100 PTS, now the budget for forum tipps for random helpfull posts is 300 PTS.
This is one of many factors why PTS is going down, its a home made inflation because I3 is releasing too much shares without consideration of the consequences.
Any comments on that?
I like the way you use bounties to push forward the community and everything you ever desired. But during the last few days/weeks i noted some inflation.
Everyone sees PTS going down. I'm not worried, 1 PTS is still 1 PTS. But if I see posts like the following I'm concerned.
Probably a good idea to give one more person access to support tip funds, barwizi is a good candidate. I can just share key for the same address.
Counting up who has done support for how long each day is not going to be scalable, let's try to move towards a system where money is split between a list of reliable staff who get paid consistently and bounties on particularly tough theads
Agreed. I am giving you a 300 pts per month budget manage salary vs tips how ever gets the job done.
The monthly budget for volunteers helping out on the technical support forum is 300 PTS as of Jan/15/2014.
The monthly donation for board and global moderators helping out everywhere and keep this wheel spinning is 100 PTS as of Jan/02/2014 (link).
Please, everyone understand, I'm not here to complain we get too less. I want you to understand there is huge decrease in value of PTS if we keep blowing out PTS at this rates. 2 weeks ago a budget for a dozen dedicated moderators keeping this forum going was 100 PTS, now the budget for forum tipps for random helpfull posts is 300 PTS.
This is one of many factors why PTS is going down, its a home made inflation because I3 is releasing too much shares without consideration of the consequences.
Any comments on that?
