136
General Discussion / Re: Crowd Donations for Mike Hearn Hangout
« on: January 16, 2016, 05:47:44 am »
send
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Overall this is a great idea, specially EVM becoming an standard as it was mentioned and the capability to interop across different chains. Bitshares provides already a great BitAsset interface / Exchange etc. This will be like running Java in different OS.
Ill have to say I am the first to say it is hard to add functionality to BitShares, as it was mentioned on the blog post it is hard to sandbox yourself to test extra functionality. It is simpler to test your models in Ethereum BUT I am also the first one to say that if you need extra performance you can move to Graphene.
I look forward to this and is never too late. Yes Toast / Rune / Ryan are great candidates to do this.
Anyone can create new smart contracts for BitShares today. There is ample
I will vote the rest of you back in later today. I hope everyone who was voted out knows it was nothing personal, I was just attempting to get to 67% participation before more drastic measures were required.
It was due to my script pointed to old version client...not sure why ? i am getting "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" after starting node
Run in GDB and post backtrace.
57.8125% participation and rising..
Proxies please support delegated-proof-of-steak and clayop because they are quality witnesses who got up to date faster than everyone else. A quick vote could get us up to 67% participation in a timely manner.
For all .... happy year 2016.@jakub BM/CNX has already showed that they wouldn't bring anything else for you to vote, why not present your opinion by voting against current choice?
(1) I vote for STEALTH instead of NOTHING because I prefer STEALTH to NOTHING.
Thus my vote is not meant to be a political manifestation but the actual choice for the best option out of the two available.
(2) I am being realistic here: at this stage we need CNX to be strong and CNX needs cash to pay their developers and grow. CNX is our strategic partner. One might argue that CNX being weak or non-existent would attract another company to fill the space, but even if this is true (which I doubt) we would end up replacing one CNX with another CNX.
(3) And last but not least: STEALTH does not matter to me personally but more people than I expected have declared that STEALTH is important to them.
So there seems to be actual market demand for this. Additionally, this is enforced by the feedback I get from people outside the crypto-world: whenever I demo the GUI to them, they are really surprised that their account and all transfers are publicly visible. They are not used to that as the legacy systems don't allow it.
Stealth has been approved by now .. removing your votes will not change anything wrt hard fork approval
Just out of curiosity..... The 45K or 50K that onceuponatime was willing to put up .....was that in the form of Bitcoin,USD or BTS ?
Bank wire transfer of US dollars.