Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If I'm not mistaken, this is an idea you've been talking about for years, ever since market pegged assets came out. Your timing here seems to indicate that you're very bullish on BTS.
You need to think BIGGER, Pinky.
you may cry if it get hacked ...LOLOnce the pump finishes, people will get bored holding a hypecoin with no GUI and and smart contracts that are clearly inferior to those on BitShares. They will then start to look at the liquidity and beauty of our DEX and come flocking over. Ethereum's market cap is just a glimpse of the great times to come for BitShares.
Im bringing out my inner Stan.
lol, traders never care about GUI .
They trade on the exchanges .
I trade Bitcoin for half a year without even touching the Bitcoin wallet
That was eth based blockchain hackathon . Isn't that?@dacplay @btswildpig @logxing
I would love an update about what play is planning. I don't think they should have to do a mumble though. Especially if none of them feel comfortable speaking english.
If btswildpig is any indication of the play devs opinion of bts, it isn't good. he seems convinced that BM is a thief.
Regarding the "thief" question , I'm sure you must speak a different set of English than I used to . Everybody knows BM acted in the way that he thought was necessary , and I question his tactics based on how I was educated/experienced, especially in the crypto field, that his tactics are simply not possible to last for a long time . It's nothing new though , I said it a year ago that dilution is not real money , that's my constant belief and educated guess . I'm simple reminding this community that there are basic and fundamental principles regarding market . Start-ups don't have "secondary market" as their only income source, no matter how many attempt to get so-called "real-users" , the up and downs is and always will be decided by the secondary market and the capital in it . Because , again , unlike real company , we don't have fixed cost/fixed income department , imaging -----when BM brought 10000 users in by his magical dilution development work ,they created 100000 USD buy pressure(highly unlikely ) , and then BM or other whale see the huge buy order coming up and sold 300000 USD worth of BTS because they want to pay tax/buy boat/whatever , is this "company" profiting or losing money ? You can't tell , could you ? That's why I said I've always said real users could not drive marketcap , because it doesn't work that way with market cap .
Sometimes I'm just too tired to repeat some basic and simple princicple regarding second market that everybody should've known a long time ago . Call me fudster for telling the common sense for all I care [emoji14] .
And second of all , I'm just a community member regarding DACPLAY now . I have no role that could branded me their "indication" .
Thanks for clarifying btswildpig. I really was not trying to talk trash. I have gotten the impression that you believe that BM has set up bitshares as his personal piggy bank to be raided whenever he feels like it. To me that would be a thief.
If instead you believe that BM has made mistakes that have hurt bitshares, but that he was not trying to rip us off then I was mistaken.
I apologize for that.
As far as not knowing if you were still, or ever involved in dacplay, the whole point of my comment was that none of us know anything about dacplay. I am still a delegate on the dacplay chain. Only missed 12 blocks too. I have no idea what is going on with it though. Should I still be spending that $20 a month to keep the server up? I have no problem paying $20 a month to help support dacplay til the end of time, as long as it is needed and its going somewhere.
Anyways thanks for responding, and I am sorry if I mis-characterized your opinion of BM.
https://github.com/bitsuperlab
I don't know much about programming . But it seems to me they've been working on the old-code and graphene code at the same time .
And they've just won the Shanghai blockchain hackaton with Graphene based random number generator (10000USD reward) .
Hmm....that's the news on January,2016.. Maybe everybody have forgotten that .
That was eth based blockchain hackathon . Isn't that?@dacplay @btswildpig @logxing
I would love an update about what play is planning. I don't think they should have to do a mumble though. Especially if none of them feel comfortable speaking english.
If btswildpig is any indication of the play devs opinion of bts, it isn't good. he seems convinced that BM is a thief.
Regarding the "thief" question , I'm sure you must speak a different set of English than I used to . Everybody knows BM acted in the way that he thought was necessary , and I question his tactics based on how I was educated/experienced, especially in the crypto field, that his tactics are simply not possible to last for a long time . It's nothing new though , I said it a year ago that dilution is not real money , that's my constant belief and educated guess . I'm simple reminding this community that there are basic and fundamental principles regarding market . Start-ups don't have "secondary market" as their only income source, no matter how many attempt to get so-called "real-users" , the up and downs is and always will be decided by the secondary market and the capital in it . Because , again , unlike real company , we don't have fixed cost/fixed income department , imaging -----when BM brought 10000 users in by his magical dilution development work ,they created 100000 USD buy pressure(highly unlikely ) , and then BM or other whale see the huge buy order coming up and sold 300000 USD worth of BTS because they want to pay tax/buy boat/whatever , is this "company" profiting or losing money ? You can't tell , could you ? That's why I said I've always said real users could not drive marketcap , because it doesn't work that way with market cap .
Sometimes I'm just too tired to repeat some basic and simple princicple regarding second market that everybody should've known a long time ago . Call me fudster for telling the common sense for all I care [emoji14] .
And second of all , I'm just a community member regarding DACPLAY now . I have no role that could branded me their "indication" .
Thanks for clarifying btswildpig. I really was not trying to talk trash. I have gotten the impression that you believe that BM has set up bitshares as his personal piggy bank to be raided whenever he feels like it. To me that would be a thief.
If instead you believe that BM has made mistakes that have hurt bitshares, but that he was not trying to rip us off then I was mistaken.
I apologize for that.
As far as not knowing if you were still, or ever involved in dacplay, the whole point of my comment was that none of us know anything about dacplay. I am still a delegate on the dacplay chain. Only missed 12 blocks too. I have no idea what is going on with it though. Should I still be spending that $20 a month to keep the server up? I have no problem paying $20 a month to help support dacplay til the end of time, as long as it is needed and its going somewhere.
Anyways thanks for responding, and I am sorry if I mis-characterized your opinion of BM.
https://github.com/bitsuperlab
I don't know much about programming . But it seems to me they've been working on the old-code and graphene code at the same time .
And they've just won the Shanghai blockchain hackaton with Graphene based random number generator (10000USD reward) .
Hmm....that's the news on January,2016.. Maybe everybody have forgotten that .
1) add the intrest to account that no moving bts for more than a month
2) to lower the fee to LTM level but increasing the vesting period(non-LTM) to 150-180 days and reduce LTM's vesting period to 7 days
FYI... Ethereum charges 0.01 ETH ($0.02) per transfer for all users, while we charges 30 BTS ($0.10). Oh I forgot LTM... yeah you need to transfer 833 times to recoup LTM fee.
