Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - twitter

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17
106
General Discussion / Re: Why I like Ethereum [BLOG POST]
« on: January 06, 2016, 11:41:18 pm »
Okay . Sounds right

107
General Discussion / Re: Why I like Ethereum [BLOG POST]
« on: January 06, 2016, 07:30:42 pm »

Quote
Anyone can create new smart contracts for BitShares today. There is ample

BM, i guess there is a typo in your blog "ample" ---> "sample"

[


quote author=bytemaster link=topic=20821.msg269014#msg269014 date=1451493763]
http://bytemaster.github.io/blog/2015/12/30/Why-I-like-Ethereum/
[/quote]

108
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:24:46 pm »
thanks for your note....
I was wondering why last night there were 7 out of 21 not producing blocks but my node(bue) was out . I guess those 7 do not need your votes and still be able to stay in the active witnesses list  .....  :P :)

I will vote the rest of you back in later today.  I hope everyone who was voted out knows it was nothing personal, I was just attempting to get to 67% participation before more drastic measures were required.

109
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:15:01 pm »
not sure why ? i am getting "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" after starting node

Run in GDB and post backtrace.
It was due to my script pointed to old version client...

BM, my witness bue is back to work and need your votes to back to service

110
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 05:14:06 am »
currently only 14 active witnesses .... 7 out of  21 are dead for 4 hours ....


bue is up    ...please vote bue back to service



57.8125% participation and rising..

Proxies please support delegated-proof-of-steak and clayop because they are quality witnesses who got up to date faster than everyone else.  A quick vote could get us up to 67% participation in a timely manner.

111
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 04:12:09 am »
“bue” is re-indexing +5% :) :)

112
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 03:11:40 am »
not sure why ? i am getting "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" after starting node

113
General Discussion / Re: New Years Group Hangout (Guestbook)
« on: January 01, 2016, 05:03:31 pm »
why no twitter?

happy 2016

114
#sharebits "tuckfheman"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="tuckfheman")
#sharebits "cube"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="cube2")
#sharebits "btsxking"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="gchicken")
#sharebits "iHashFury"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="ihashfury")
#sharebits "jakub"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="jakub")
#sharebits "Emailtooaj"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="Shizbit")
#sharebits "abit"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="abit")
#sharebits "inarizushi"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="inarizushi")
#sharebits "Xeldal"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="Xeldal")
#sharebits "facer"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="facer")
#sharebits "pc"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="pc")
#sharebits "JonnyBitcoin"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="jonnybitcoin")
#sharebits "gchicken"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="gchicken-2")
#sharebits "fuzzy"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="fuzzy")
#sharebits "twitter"  2016  OPENSESAME  (MUMBLE="twitter")

115
[member=19939]jakub[/member] BM/CNX has already showed that they wouldn't bring anything else for you to vote, why not present your opinion by voting against current choice?

(1) I vote for STEALTH instead of NOTHING because I prefer STEALTH to NOTHING.
Thus my vote is not meant to be a political manifestation but the actual choice for the best option out of the two available.

(2) I am being realistic here: at this stage we need CNX to be strong and CNX needs cash to pay their developers and grow. CNX is our strategic partner. One might argue that CNX being weak or non-existent would attract another company to fill the space, but even if this is true (which I doubt) we would end up replacing one CNX with another CNX.

(3) And last but not least: STEALTH does not matter to me personally but more people than I expected have declared that STEALTH is important to them.
So there seems to be actual market demand for this. Additionally, this is enforced by the feedback I get from people outside the crypto-world: whenever I demo the GUI to them, they are really surprised that their account and all transfers are publicly visible. They are not used to that as the legacy systems don't allow it.
For all .... happy year 2016.

I wish bm will be a shining star in the new year and bts price  to the moon
Stealth has been approved by now .. removing your votes will not change anything wrt hard fork approval

116
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: why not cath up bts2.0'update?
« on: December 29, 2015, 02:20:41 pm »
I am still having trouble to claim my muse from bts 1.0 wallet. @Cob should release a catch up version for muse

117
General Discussion / Re: New Stealth Transfer Worker ($1000)
« on: December 19, 2015, 06:36:12 pm »
Why not use bitusd ?   [member=49]onceuponatime[/member]
if you use bitUSD , our BTS system  can benefit from this deal

Just out of curiosity.....   The 45K or 50K that onceuponatime was willing to put up .....was that in the form of  Bitcoin,USD or BTS ?

Bank wire transfer of US dollars.

118
General Discussion / Re: Key Bitshares Projects?
« on: December 16, 2015, 01:09:20 am »
What more ?
I am looking for key players,  their orles and funds raised if any.
Alternatively, just name them and I could do the rest of the research.

P.s - is there a central repository with this info ? If not ,why not make one ?

http://neura-sx.github.io/#ecosystem/entities

It's not a central repository, just my recent attempt to collect & structure the important information.
(if anyone can offer help to fill the missing info / fix mistakes - it's very welcome)
Nice work..

Some info for bue

1)locate in Winnipeg, canada.
2)more info can be found at
http://cryptofresh.com/a/OPENSESAME 



What more ?
I am looking for key players,  their orles and funds raised if any.
Alternatively, just name them and I could do the rest of the research.

P.s - is there a central repository with this info ? If not ,why not make one ?

http://neura-sx.github.io/#ecosystem/entities

It's not a central repository, just my recent attempt to collect & structure the important information.
(if anyone can offer help to fill the missing info / fix mistakes - it's very welcome)

119
BM is not a candidate :P :P :P :P :P :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

CoinDesk's Most Influential People in Bitcoin and Blockchain in 2015
 
  Mike Hearn, R3
 Blythe Masters, Digital Asset Holdings
 Andreas M. Antonopoulos
 Balaji Srinivasan, 21
 Roger Ver, Bitcoin.com
 Elizabeth Rossiello, Bitpesa
 Greg Maxwell, Adam Back and the Blockstream team
 Tim Swanson, R3
 Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum
 Wences Casares, Xapo
 Nick Szabo, Independent

http://www.coindesk.com/vote-2015s-most-influential-bitcoin-blockchain/

120
General Discussion / Re: Why Cryptocurrencies Matter
« on: December 14, 2015, 12:37:38 am »
nice +5%

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 17