Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - twitter

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 19
106



./steemd —miner='["accountname","${WIFPRIVATEKEY}"]' —witness='"accountname"' —seed-node="52.38.66.234:2001" —mining-threads=2

who can explain how to get accountname  and WIFPRIVATEKEY?

 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

108
@xeroc I appreciate all the work you done for our community. You have my support

109

110
General Discussion / Re: Ethereum price discussion
« on: February 12, 2016, 12:40:18 am »
Once the pump finishes, people will get bored holding a hypecoin with no GUI and and smart contracts that are clearly inferior to those on BitShares. They will then start to look at the liquidity and beauty of our DEX and come flocking over. Ethereum's market cap is just a glimpse of the great times to come for BitShares.

Im bringing out my inner Stan.

lol, traders never care about GUI .
They trade on the exchanges .

I trade Bitcoin for half a year without even touching the Bitcoin wallet
you may cry if it get hacked ...LOL

111
after reading BM's blog for no tx fee blockchain , it is brilliant  and  we should give him full  support . That's exactly what future blockchain should be .... +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

112
after reading BM's blog for no fee blockchain , it is brilliant  and  we should give him full  support . That's exactly what future blockchain should be .... +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

113
it is good sign for BTS in year of golden monkey as Chinese ppl wish

114
General Discussion / happy year of MONKEY
« on: February 07, 2016, 04:02:55 pm »


#sharebits "spartako" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="spartako")
#sharebits "abit" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="abit")
#sharebits "Xeldal" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="Xeldal")
#sharebits "Bhuz" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="bhuz")
#sharebits "hadrian" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="hadrian")
#sharebits "dannotestein" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="dantest")
#sharebits "onceuponatime" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="onceuponatime")
#sharebits "iHashFury" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="ihashfury")
#sharebits "gchicken" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="gchicken-2")
#sharebits "testz" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="testz")
#sharebits "jcalfee1" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="jcalfee2")
#sharebits "tbone" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="tbone")
#sharebits "bitbuckster" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="brindleswan")
#sharebits "fuzzy" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="fuzzy")
#sharebits "wildwex" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="wildwex")
#sharebits "Jwf" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="Jwf-mobile")
#sharebits "pc" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="pc")
#sharebits "lil_jay890" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="lil_jay890")
#sharebits "DestBest" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="DestBest")
#sharebits "stan" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="stan")
#sharebits "pheonike" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="pheonike")
#sharebits "lafona" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="lafona")
#sharebits "mangou007" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="mangou007")
#sharebits "Topcandle" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="Sxis")
#sharebits "facer" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="facer")
#sharebits "Luckybit" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="Luckybit2")
#sharebits "roadscape" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="roadscape")
#sharebits "chris4210" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="chris4210")
#sharebits "betax" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="betax")
#sharebits "jakub" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="jakub")
#sharebits "Unosuke" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="unosuke")
#sharebits "lovejoy" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="lovejoy")
#sharebits "EstefanTT" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="EstefanTT")
#sharebits "twitter" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="twitter")
#sharebits "dmo09" 88 OPENSESAME (MUMBLE="dmo09")
       

115
[member=33724]dacplay[/member]  [member=25607]btswildpig[/member] [member=1744]logxing[/member]

I would love an update about what play is planning.  I don't think they should have to do a mumble though.  Especially if none of them feel comfortable speaking english.

If btswildpig is any indication of the play devs opinion of bts, it isn't good.  he seems convinced that BM is a thief.

Regarding the "thief" question , I'm sure you must speak a different set of English than I used to . Everybody knows BM acted in the way that he thought was necessary , and I question his tactics based on how I was educated/experienced, especially in the crypto field, that his tactics are simply not possible to last for a long time  . It's nothing new though , I said it a year ago that dilution is not real money , that's my constant belief and educated guess .  I'm simple reminding this community that there are basic and fundamental principles regarding market . Start-ups don't have "secondary market" as their only income source, no matter how many attempt to get so-called "real-users" , the up and downs is and always will be decided by the secondary market and the capital in it . Because , again , unlike real company , we don't have fixed cost/fixed income department , imaging -----when BM brought 10000 users in by his magical dilution development work  ,they created 100000 USD buy pressure(highly unlikely ) , and then BM or other whale see the huge buy order coming up and sold 300000 USD worth of BTS because they want to pay tax/buy boat/whatever , is this "company" profiting or losing money ? You can't tell , could you ? That's why I said I've always said real users could not drive marketcap , because it doesn't work that way with market cap .

Sometimes I'm just too tired to repeat some basic and simple princicple regarding second market that everybody should've known a long time ago . Call me fudster for telling the common sense for all I care 


And second of all , I'm just a community member regarding DACPLAY now . I have no role that could branded me their "indication" .

Thanks for clarifying btswildpig.  I really was not trying to talk trash.  I have gotten the impression that you believe that BM has set up bitshares as his personal piggy bank to be raided whenever he feels like it.  To me that would be a thief. 

If instead you believe that BM has made mistakes that have hurt bitshares, but that he was not trying to rip us off then I was mistaken.

I apologize for that.

As far as not knowing if you were still, or ever involved in dacplay, the whole point of my comment was that none of us know anything about dacplay.  I am still a delegate on the dacplay chain.  Only missed 12 blocks too.  I have no idea what is going on with it though.  Should I still be spending that $20 a month to keep the server up?  I have no problem paying $20 a month to help support dacplay til the end of time, as long as it is needed and its going somewhere. 

Anyways thanks for responding, and I am sorry if I mis-characterized your opinion of BM.


https://github.com/bitsuperlab   

I don't know much about programming . But it seems to me they've been working on the old-code and graphene code at the same time .
And they've just won the Shanghai blockchain hackaton with Graphene based random number generator (10000USD reward) . 

Hmm....that's the news on January,2016.. Maybe everybody have forgotten that .
That was eth based blockchain hackathon . Isn't that?


DACPLAY won ether hackathon

116
[member=33724]dacplay[/member]  [member=25607]btswildpig[/member] [member=1744]logxing[/member]

I would love an update about what play is planning.  I don't think they should have to do a mumble though.  Especially if none of them feel comfortable speaking english.

If btswildpig is any indication of the play devs opinion of bts, it isn't good.  he seems convinced that BM is a thief.

Regarding the "thief" question , I'm sure you must speak a different set of English than I used to . Everybody knows BM acted in the way that he thought was necessary , and I question his tactics based on how I was educated/experienced, especially in the crypto field, that his tactics are simply not possible to last for a long time  . It's nothing new though , I said it a year ago that dilution is not real money , that's my constant belief and educated guess .  I'm simple reminding this community that there are basic and fundamental principles regarding market . Start-ups don't have "secondary market" as their only income source, no matter how many attempt to get so-called "real-users" , the up and downs is and always will be decided by the secondary market and the capital in it . Because , again , unlike real company , we don't have fixed cost/fixed income department , imaging -----when BM brought 10000 users in by his magical dilution development work  ,they created 100000 USD buy pressure(highly unlikely ) , and then BM or other whale see the huge buy order coming up and sold 300000 USD worth of BTS because they want to pay tax/buy boat/whatever , is this "company" profiting or losing money ? You can't tell , could you ? That's why I said I've always said real users could not drive marketcap , because it doesn't work that way with market cap .

Sometimes I'm just too tired to repeat some basic and simple princicple regarding second market that everybody should've known a long time ago . Call me fudster for telling the common sense for all I care 


And second of all , I'm just a community member regarding DACPLAY now . I have no role that could branded me their "indication" .

Thanks for clarifying btswildpig.  I really was not trying to talk trash.  I have gotten the impression that you believe that BM has set up bitshares as his personal piggy bank to be raided whenever he feels like it.  To me that would be a thief. 

If instead you believe that BM has made mistakes that have hurt bitshares, but that he was not trying to rip us off then I was mistaken.

I apologize for that.

As far as not knowing if you were still, or ever involved in dacplay, the whole point of my comment was that none of us know anything about dacplay.  I am still a delegate on the dacplay chain.  Only missed 12 blocks too.  I have no idea what is going on with it though.  Should I still be spending that $20 a month to keep the server up?  I have no problem paying $20 a month to help support dacplay til the end of time, as long as it is needed and its going somewhere. 

Anyways thanks for responding, and I am sorry if I mis-characterized your opinion of BM.


https://github.com/bitsuperlab   

I don't know much about programming . But it seems to me they've been working on the old-code and graphene code at the same time .
And they've just won the Shanghai blockchain hackaton with Graphene based random number generator (10000USD reward) . 

Hmm....that's the news on January,2016.. Maybe everybody have forgotten that .
That was eth based blockchain hackathon . Isn't that?

117
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: February 01, 2016, 08:38:57 am »

we can definitely lower the fee to the same level as ETH ... do not worry ... we are getting there ...soooooooooooon

Quote
1) add the intrest to account that no moving bts for more than a month

2) to lower the fee to LTM level but increasing the vesting period(non-LTM) to 150-180 days and reduce LTM's vesting period to 7 days

FYI... Ethereum charges 0.01 ETH ($0.02) per transfer for all users, while we charges 30 BTS ($0.10). Oh I forgot LTM... yeah you need to transfer 833 times to recoup LTM fee.

118
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: February 01, 2016, 07:56:56 am »
1) add the intrest to account that no moving bts for more than a month

2) to lower the fee to LTM level but increasing the vesting period(non-LTM) to 150-180 days and reduce LTM's vesting period to 7 days

119
there is a bit off topic

I guess most of you don't know bitcrab because of he handle his business so professional, never ask for a cent from community. so you even don't know his exist.
there is a world in China: a baby who cried louder can get more candies.

and I guess you also don't know, bitcrab is one of the guys who first translate bitshares whitepaper to Chinese,  almost all Chinese fans got to known BTS because of him.

Ironically, you call this guy  toxic to bitshares
you don't learn to respect our old friend, no new friend will come
you don't learn to respect share holders(how many times you have said, fork it  if you not satisfied), no money will support us
Agree, our community is far too un friendly to everyone and no good listener  at all

120
I would suggest to add intrest for not moving bts in your wallet instead of lower transaction fee. Low transaction fee means easier to spam . Keep in mind ,bts is a platform for assets trading not just a simple bank account

If you had all of BTS in your possession, you would run out of them in about one month, if you try to spam 1000 tps network with 1 BTS per transaction fee. Who is going to do this?
High-frequency stock trading. Have you heard it  before

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 19