看这些老帖子，再对比过去几年梓晨在BTS社区的所作所为，和星在飘比，这个奶王梓晨，的确是太可笑了，不过草根想上位，也只能嘴上一套，见多了不怪

这个梓晨攻击星在飘这些一面之词，不知道哪样不是梓晨擅长的，而且青出于蓝而胜于蓝？

做见证人是吃力不讨好的事情，为什么星在飘要去赔钱做? bts在14年的价格大概就2分，见证人所得够付服务器和api节点的吗？

真的，把哥整笑了。多年以后看星飘继续表演，依然令人叹为观止。

对比过去几年梓晨在BTS社区的所作所为，和星在飘比，这个奶王梓晨，的确是太可笑了，不过草根想上位，也只能嘴上一套，见多了不怪

这个梓晨攻击星在飘这些一面之词，不知道哪样不是梓晨擅长的，而且青出于蓝而胜于蓝？

做见证人是吃力不讨好的事情，为什么星在飘要去赔钱做? bts在14年的价格大概就2分，见证人所得够付服务器和api节点的吗？

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

嗯，我昨天把这些帖子都翻出来看了一下，感觉星在飘没有任何出格的事，而且大部分都是一面之词。市场本来就是各种消息混杂，比某些人利用规则私吞社区资金，藐视dpos约定要好多了。好好看看bts的历史，发表声明的家伙就是后来比特股社区臭名昭著私吞社区资金100多万的梓晨，也叫“扯淡”.他发表声明时义愤填膺，后来做的事情也让社区义愤填膺

一些旧往事，原贴在这里：https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10970.msg144496#msg144496

关于本人（浮壹白Allen）退出coin受托人团队的声明
« on: November 04, 2014, 01:41:59 am »
Quote
其实我在10月份的时候就已经退出了，但只是没有在论坛上发表声明。而最近几天sfinder在论坛、QQ群里散布谣言、忽悠新人、恶意唱空等行为，引起了很多人的愤慨，并且他使用多个马甲id发帖，自吹自捧，让不明真相的群众看不清事实的真相。我想，作为coin团队前成员，是时候该说明一下我所了解的前前后后，以及表明我的态度。

嗯，我昨天把这些帖子都翻出来看了一下，感觉星在飘没有任何出格的事，而且大部分都是一面之词。市场本来就是各种消息混杂，比某些人利用规则私吞社区资金，藐视dpos约定要好多了。好好看看bts的历史，发表声明的家伙就是后来比特股社区臭名昭著私吞社区资金100多万的梓晨，也叫“扯淡”.他发表声明时义愤填膺，后来做的事情也让社区义愤填膺
通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

abit欺骗社区，强取豪夺，破坏共识
现在我们讨论的问题是我们bts社区是否赞同abit藐视dpos共识的做法？我关心的是程序正义，社区声誉，共识尊严，严惩恶行。

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

这逼装的， 你那点事要我都说出来嘛？

星在飘当初也和abit一样协助很多人运行见证人，这点我很清楚。我认为当初社区相当不成熟，后来协助大票仓运行见证人的事情司空见惯了，还有这么远古的事情还是留给历史把，星在飘出事主要是说了500个比特币社区推广资金的事情

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

刚才看了英文帖子，发现这个星在飘还是个技术高手，也是一个人协助运行好几个见证人，见证人运营是吃力不讨好的事情，看来这个人对bts是有有热情的人。abit好像也帮别人运行见证人，不过阿逼都是收钱的，见钱眼开。。。

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

我看了一下星在飘的帖子,他做得对，那么早就质疑理事会，挥霍bts公款的情况，看来理事会早就烂了

通过我的 V1813A 上的 Tapatalk发言

Nice. i totally agree with you .  abit 's  new vote system is another big piece of shit

The new voting system is poorly done.

Jumping from one shit into another.

Remembers me of dumb voters who always jump from one party to another in hope it gets better.


The stacking mechanism in current form is wrong

The biggest paradox is BTS is core token of our ecosystem.

This voting system is in decline with that function.

A member who has 1000 BTS and participates in the ecosystem to make Bitshares great has less voting power than somebody who has 1000 BTS and does nothing in ecosystem other than stacking and receiving up to 8 times the voting power of the guy who actually brings the ecosystem forward and income.

These stupid stacking ideas are all based on theory and academic bs.

You know why chinese won economic battle against US ?
Because US is and was leaaded by academic idiots who only know theory unable to forcast the result of their actions.
China had/has old currency traders living in reality knowing what will be the result when doing a or b and able to forcast years in forward based on their planned actions.

You guys clearly represent the US academics who have completly no clue what you get in the end result.




But you are free to explain to me where the additional value comes from
the one guy with 1000 BTS stacking when he is not going to participate in ecosystem.Where will the income come from ?

And the guy who is trading 1000 BTS and knows the ecosystem well and pays fee's to the network will be dictated/controlled by the other guy who knows it only theoraticly.


But the inactive guy is worth more as he is "willing to sacrifice their personal interests for the benefit of the community"
What exectly did he sacrifice ?Did he worked more for bitshares than the active trader ?


What an idiotic logic based on an one time price pump and not growth

 
You guys have now the opportunity to chose between horseshit1 and horseshit2 as voting system.




Somebody going to explain to me what BTS exectly represents  ?A blockchain with high acitivity including a populated dex or just a blockchain with no activity and no populated dex but pure speculation token for a pump ?