Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - abit

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15
Sorry for mention this again and again in the forum, but I really don't like such kind of rush-for-voting.

Stakeholder Proposals / Questions about the refund400k worker proposal
« on: December 19, 2015, 12:57:00 pm »
As [member=31]fav[/member] mentioned,
[member=31]fav[/member] I wonder why you vote against worker refund400k (1.4.0)?
refund400k - intentional. there's no official written proposal or explanation on it - the bare minimum in my opinion.
It's strange that a proposal with no document could get voted in with high approval rate.

[member=120]xeroc[/member] would you please draft a document for the refund400k proposal? Or better help committee-account to create a refund proposal to replace the current one?

中文(Chinese) / 关于STEALTH投票
« on: December 19, 2015, 10:39:08 am »
STEALTH就是类似bts 0.9里面的TITAN账号功能,不过更高级一点,会隐藏转账金额。另外一个不同就是凭收据收款,不像0.9里靠暴力猜解(regenerate-rescan)


Xeroc已经发起了一个work proposal投票,见 的 1.4.18
建议中国社区特别是大户踊跃投票。 [member=23]bitcrab[/member] [member=20]ebit[/member] [member=34]Harvey[/member]

1. 这个proposal修改了STEALTH的底层费用分配,导致其他方式使用STEALTH(比如CLI、月石钱包)也要付费给Onceupatime。
2. 当前STEALTH底层实现不完善,通过对转账地址进行数据分析可以一定程度上跟踪资金流向,将这样不完善的功能通过GUI推出来,会留下隐患,对BTS名声不利。万一谁用STEALTH干了什么事被分析出来。。
3. 目前阶段,开发STEALTH界面的优先级不高,不如API优化等重要
4. proposal里把FBA开发和STEALTH费用重新分配捆绑在一起,虽然个人认为FBA比较重要,但更倾向于支持独立的FBA开发proposal

General Discussion / New features on CryptoFresh
« on: December 13, 2015, 05:21:52 pm »
Has anybody ever posted here about the new features on CrypotoFresh?
Voting Report

Technical Support / Price feed on CryptoFresh
« on: December 04, 2015, 03:34:49 pm »
[member=21903]roadscape[/member] Look like the price feeds displayed on are 5% more than which displayed on OpenLedger.

Technical Support / Issue with price feed script
« on: December 04, 2015, 03:32:25 pm »
[member=120]xeroc[/member] I'm using your latest script with this config:
Code: [Select]
                   "CNY" : {
                       "metric" : "weighted",
                       "sources" : ["btc38",
feedSources["yunbi"]    = feedsources.Yunbi(allowFailure=True,scaleVolumeBy=0.3)
feedSources["btc38"]    = feedsources.Btc38(allowFailure=True)
feedSources["btcchina"] = feedsources.BtcChina(allowFailure=True,scaleVolumeBy=0.2)
feedSources["okcoin"]   = feedsources.Okcoin(allowFailure=True,scaleVolumeBy=0.2)
feedSources["huobi"]    = feedsources.Huobi(allowFailure=True,scaleVolumeBy=0.2)
But the price of BTS/CNY is usually 5% higher than normal (e.g. result=0.023, should be 0.022)
After I disabled bts/btc pairs of btc38 and yunbi, then the result looks fine.

Since volumes of bts/btc on btc38 and yunbi are far less than those of bts/cny (about 1:1000), I don't know why the weighted result is so far from the bts/cny price only (even though price of bts/btc is somehow higher).

中文(Chinese) / 老狼进来看下,关于投票
« on: December 04, 2015, 09:07:47 am »
[member=34]Harvey[/member] 老狼

General Discussion / Best X% value of daily settlement limit?
« on: December 03, 2015, 11:28:10 am »
Update: after theoretical has confirmed that GRAPHENE_DEFAULT_FORCE_SETTLEMENT_MAX_VOLUME is indeed set to 20%, the committee has worked with the devs to create another update asset proposal to change the value to 2%.

We set the expiredate to the same as the other proposal, so both parameter changes will go live in roughly 14 hours from now.

You can review the proposal here:
Thx to [member=21903]roadscape[/member] for quickly adding this new view!
Thx to [member=3002]theoretical[/member] for reacting so quickly and creating the asset proposal!
Looks like the committee rushed changing the daily settlement limit for CNY from 20% to 2% just because "devs intended to set it to 2%, but made a mistake so it was set to 20%"? How do you know that 2% is not another mistake? BM has ever said that he doesn't know the best parameters.
Obviously high limit profits some people but hurt some other people, and vise versa.
We need more discussion before make decisions.

Just an idea, in order to encourage the using of bitAssets for payment:
1. Everyday (or every Saturday or so), start from an exact time, we offer that every account have the chance of transferring bitAssets N times for FREE (transfer fees will be fully refunded), with a pre-set total limit of T times, and maybe an amount limit with each transfer.
2. After that T times have been reached, we offer that the accounts which transferred bitAssets less than N times have the chance of transferring bitAssets X times at a fee discount of Y% (transfer fees will be partially refunded), with a pre-set total limit of Z times.
3. Maybe another (less) discount.

The budget needed for refund these fees comes from a worker position.

Does it make sense? The parameters need to be set after discussions.

(After seen lots of this kind of promotions in Chinese online-payment ecosystem)

Freebie / Possible to deposit to by issuing UIA?
« on: November 27, 2015, 03:18:32 pm »

Tx 1f4a34b5ed0d4ac3ec7ee9f463a6d92ca8557d0f@1287679
abit issued 1,000,000 THUMBSUP to sharebits
block 1,287,679

Will it reach my account @sharebits? I can't see it in the panel.
I thought the memo I entered is correct.
Or the deposit only works with transfer?

中文(Chinese) / 怎么现在才突然提出force settlement的问题
« on: November 27, 2015, 11:52:15 am »


Hi Everyone,

The BITUSD/BTC and BITCNY/BTC markets were added on Poloniex at 2015-11-24.

If we can keep them in the top 10 list of btc trade pairs, it could be a big advertisement.
To achieve this, we need a daily volume of about 20 btc, and the cost is 0.4%, aka 0.16 btc, about 16000 bts at today's rate.

Just an idea. Any input are appreciated.

中文(Chinese) / P网开通BTC/BITUSD和BTC/BITCNY交易对
« on: November 25, 2015, 03:14:25 pm »


General Discussion / Voting Power
« on: November 13, 2015, 05:06:06 pm »
According to the "Proxy Spotlight" section on, voting power of the community is now greater than of BM.

Random Discussion / Where is Arhag?
« on: November 03, 2015, 08:33:52 pm »
Long time no see.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15