Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xolokram

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
16
Are you sure you're running a 64bit OS? (check the system status information)
Otherwise you should ask the author of the mining software.

- xolokram

17
...
i've added a link to your page on ptsweb info page

18
i just wanted to let you all know, that beeeeer has now its own *work-in-progress* board to gather all the good links/projects/faq/tutorials ets.pp.
it can be found here: board.beeeeer.org

although i dont expect everyone to switch to that board (i won't beg or force you), i hope i'll see some of the community members from here on beeeeer's board too.

no panic, i will be still here and answer your questions/PMs  :)

@justmwa:
could you give us at least some more details about your arguments, probably the pool name & mining software you're comparing with?
beeeeer's pts pool is quite small (compared to the overall network power), thus we're more depending on  luck, than other (=bigger) pools.

@totoleheros:
thank you for your miner stats page :thumbs-up:

regarding the payout barrier: yeah, sure, i can do that, but i don't think that 0.01 PTS is a good idea (atm), i think 0.1 would be a better next step.

@sharetarget&ypool:
i don't think that ypool & beeeer use the same share target, thus it's not useful to compare them directly
and secondly this is always a question of the used mining software and its efficiency

- xolokram

19
user stats are based on blocks & payouts
thus you'll have to wait until the first block you've been participated in will be found

(beeeeeer's pts pool is quite small (% of the network), thus this can take a few hours :-X)

20
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 27, 2014, 10:55:35 pm »
not only the pool is doing pretty poorly
the whole network is kinda slow atm -> https://coinplorer.com/PTS

transactions / payouts for everybody with more than 0.001 PTS and a valid PTS addres are out (for about an hour now!) and are currently in network limbo, we'll have to wait until a block is found and the transactions get their confirmations
Code: [Select]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/edit1:
beeeeer's pool just found block #57614, hopefully including some transactions

/edit2:
Quote from: anon
thank you, xolokram
you're welcome :P

21
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 26, 2014, 09:34:46 pm »
yep, we were a little bit unlucky today
but choosing the 22th for comparison is a kind of cherry-picking here
i would say the average is still something around ~10 blocks per day with the current difficulty and the # of miners

22
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 26, 2014, 07:44:01 am »
its a automatic payout? I mined 2 hours in my wallet still its zero ?
payout is exectued when your reach 0.2 pts

I'm wondering if the pool is okay? I know difficulty has gone up but I don't think they've mined a block for awhile? Any ideas?
57157 
Is this the last block found on Beeeeeeer?
Thanks
yep, pool is alright as far as i can tell
we're just 3-4% of the network (that's about 10 blocks per day on average, luck is a bitch)
and the difficult hit us hard (as everyone else)

- xolokram

ps. i plan to execute a dry-run for this evening/tonight to see if everything will work fine for tomorrow's big payout, just fyi
pps. how are the rejection rates atm?

23
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 23, 2014, 08:47:14 pm »
ok, share target updated.

also: if you see more stales instead of rejects than before (stales should be actually pretty rare) -> they are basically just rejects, i currently use the stale-value for statistical purpose to get a better understanding of the problem to finally fix it hopefully soon

24
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 23, 2014, 06:57:54 pm »
hi,

the pool had to struggle with some higher workload during the last days. i'll change the share difficulty to reduce the workload, thus the overall shares/minute will decrease (in total for everyone). payouts & blocks are not affected by this.

i hope this will also reduce the rejection problem.

i'll report back once the difficulty is changed. and once it has been changed: feel free to report your observation.

Although reject rate is very high, you wouldn't obtain better results on ypool. Everybody gets the same share of a block so you are not loosing 10% as in effect everybody is affected so everyone's share size remains the same with or without loss.
this ^

@wsnnwa:
regarding your disconnect problem: what hardware are you using?

- xolokram

25
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 22, 2014, 10:50:59 am »
Or could you just revert your fix?
you're aware of the fact, that this would mean it'll be exploitable?!
btw. that's why i want to see the #share/block needed, it should decrease with the new (actually old, but now re-activated) security-fix, although i admit that the higher rejection rate looks crappy on the miner's side.

I am using ptsminer v0.7. Is it have the issue you mentioned above? If yes, how to fix it
by fixing the code or thinking of a better solution for blocktemplate-creation.


and not all rejections are caused by the security-fix, some might by caused by the increased workload of the server & decreased block time that's currently happening due to the rising popularity of protoshares.

26
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 22, 2014, 09:17:00 am »
Hi,

first, i hope i won't miss a statement/message/question: i'm sorry if i'll do, post again pls :)

@rejection rate:
i've activated a few security measurements on the pool, this includes disconnecting spamming miners (very rare!) and rejecting shares that are identical clones of already submitted shares. i know that the original miner is having an issue with this on machines with a lot of computing power due to the blocktemplate-creating method. i don't know if this has been changed/updated/fixed/checked on the third-party miners?!?!

i hope (at least) one of the developer is reading this.

@Darkbane+wsnnwa&Co.:
I just checked "...kzse4B", from what i'm able to tell it doesn't look like a botnet. But you could never know, as there are enough ways to obfuscate the connections. Anyway, thanks for finding, i'll keep an eye on that.

it also could be already existing server farm that is currently (temporary?) switching to PTS due to the 28th February event.

@justmwa:
sorry :) but i think you're faster than me with this
feature request --> a general pool stats page with daily stats like: #shares / block

- xolokram

27
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 21, 2014, 05:44:41 pm »
hi,
sorry for the late and *spoiler* unstatisfying reply:
i'm currently busy fixing the primecoin pool backend

i'll come back here later and answer the questions once i'm done there. sorry.

- xolokram

ps. i'm available on the irc channel for easy questions, but i'm busy, so don't expect quick answers :)

28
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 21, 2014, 07:31:44 am »
can you specify some details, like: % of rejects before and now, what miner/os are you using?

is somebody else seeing effects like this?

the (security) changes i've made shouldn't result in more rejects. but if you encounter reconnects, that could be the effect of the changes yesterday.

- xolokram

29
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 20, 2014, 10:57:10 am »
pool should be up again, yes *pheww*

i could schedule a "big" payout for all addresses that have PTS left for the 27th of February
everybody should check they addresses for typos before that
i don't want to have dozens of messages of because someone used a invalid address on the miner on 27/28th of February :)

- xolokram

30
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: February 20, 2014, 08:41:45 am »
i'm working on it, something's broken on the network node (thx to anon for notification @ irc)
one moment please

- xolokram

ps. wallet/coins are safe
pps. i reset the network node, it might take a few minutes to re-download the blockchain, stay tuned

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16