Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - xolokram

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
91
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 11, 2013, 08:13:38 pm »
bottleneck for the computation
your ram/cpu is not fast enough, it's nothing unusual

92
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 11, 2013, 07:34:34 pm »
@btc2084:
it would be possible to do this (one big file with all optimized code), but this is really difficult & complex, introducing more bugs/problems which i want to avoid atm as there's enough to do.

if you have a modern cpu you should use the avx version and it --should-- also activate avx on its own.
if you're unsure about your cpu then use the sse4 version and it --should-- also activate sse4 on its own, otherwise it will fallback (just like the avx version) to sphlib.

if you encounter multiple random crashs, then your cpu is not suitable for avx and sse4 at all (aka your cpu is old), then you should use the sph version.

@Harvester:
you should use the default of the ram usage parameter. if you're feeling lucky (aka you have very fast ram/cpu) and have enough ram then you can increase it. if you dont have enough ram, decrease it. but maxing it out with even more ram, just because you have enough ram is not very useful as the ram with rapidly become your new bottleneck for the computation.

@zvs:
thank you.

- xolokram

93
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 11, 2013, 08:44:19 am »
sorry, i forgot to activate the cronjobs again after the small maintenance yesterday evening
the 'missing' payouts should be executed within the next minutes

:slap:

 :o

94
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 09:48:24 pm »
system:10060 = timeout for connection
but the pool is definetely running and connectable
something's blocking your connection

(except you were "lucky" and tested your connection while i was working on the pool software for ~3 minutes...)

95
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 09:37:09 pm »
@nitrominer:
that looks fine, do you get any error message or output from the miner?

/edit: i can connect from my place with your .bat, just tested it

@drmyfore:
collision / minute <-- the actual work that's done to find a protoshares block (aka your performance, compare this to others)
shares / minute <-- the # of shares you're submitting, this is also depending on the server config (aka sharetarget, this is not a good measure to compare)

SMALL POOL MAINTENANCE INCOMING *done*

96
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 09:21:04 pm »
@gabbo+nitrominer:
what about showing us your .bat content?

ps. (very) small server downtime incoming due to some maintenance

97
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 03:11:05 pm »
proportional, if all miners submit 80% of the shares on share target 3fff.. than on share target 7fff.. than your payout is the same

98
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 02:56:12 pm »
pps. i've decreased the share target
sh/m is not important for your "performance"
col/m is (and shouldn't be affected by the share target)

99
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 01:39:09 pm »
@realtailer:
REMOVE THAT LINK FROM THIS THREAD NOW!!

if you want to 'promote' anything, create your own thread!

@testz:
can you remove the link from your post, please?

100
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 10:30:22 am »
LTC != PTS

fyi the pool is making around 550-800* PTS per day with >5000 miners

- xolokram

* = highly depending on randomness (aka luck) <-- this also applies to every single miner**
** = and miner configuration

101
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 10:19:58 am »
so are you comparing your hardware setups, software or (totally different) coins?
or all together?

all i see (from your screenshot):
you've recently made 0.00941 PTS in 6 hours
before that you've made 0.00965 PTS in 21 hours

i would call that an improvement  :o

- xolokram

/edit: ok, i see there are quite huge gaps in your stats so i guess you're not mining 24hours a day
what is your miner configuration for these two hardware setups???

102
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 09:55:30 am »
look at the timestamps
your proportion on a round is higher than before

103
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 10, 2013, 08:34:20 am »
libminiupnp is not needed too

@btc2084(+aleiprecht):
95% collisions? or rejects?
can you send me a log excerpt from your miners showing a few lines before and after rejected shares via PM?

- xolokram

ps. is one of you guys this address: Pg[...]BNWVJ ???
pps. i've decreased the share target

104
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 09, 2013, 09:29:11 pm »
sorry, for the rare posts, i'm currently focusing on upgrading the primecoin pool/webpage/stats etc.pp.
as i was focusing on pts too much the last couple of weeks (the todos were piling up :) )

@zzz111:
it's ok, you can do that.

@Gilligan:
per round

a round (to find a block) takes usually several thousands shares
this is your portion of this specific round

beeeer's pts pool is paying you proportional on a block/round (not like the XPM pool, where you're paid per share)

- xolokram

105
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool
« on: December 06, 2013, 06:04:18 pm »
hi,
I'm sorry for the late reply. i'm compiling the windows binaries right now, i'll update this (and the first) post when they're uploaded to mediafire

here's the hotfix #3: *CLICK* (Windows 64Bit Binaries)
containing the 'rejections-on-a-block-workaround-by-reconnecting'-fix :)

@macos:
i dont have a test environment, but let me know if you're able to fix something with the osx makefile.

@drmyfore:
i think you'll have to test the best value for you on your own, as the performance the miner is depending on your cpu & ram
and hypter-threading's additional performance is fluctuating too

- xolokram

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16