31
General Discussion / Too many missed and forked blocks due to new wallet
« on: December 12, 2014, 08:24:13 am »
Will more tests before releasing avoid this in future?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Will more tests before releasing avoid this in future?
32
General Discussion / A lot of delegates are forking, is it because the new wallet?
« on: December 12, 2014, 07:31:04 am »
-5% , -5%
33
General Discussion / BitAsset market is going into chaos
« on: November 13, 2014, 04:34:56 am »
Some user issued assets includes bitEUR, bitUSD, bitCNY... these might bring confusion to new users and eventually bring chaos or possible fraud... So far, more than 50 new assets are created after the update.
I think there needs some rules for user issued assets, at least bitUSD can not be issued by users, because the USD in BTS market was originally called bitUSD...
I think there needs some rules for user issued assets, at least bitUSD can not be issued by users, because the USD in BTS market was originally called bitUSD...
34
中文 (Chinese) / 欢迎cn-members成为本版新版主
« on: November 10, 2014, 04:51:49 pm »
lib版主很久前已经辞职，也久未登录。最近社区的三位发言人，他们以公共帐号cn-members为大家做了很多贡献。因此，欢迎cn-members替代lib,成为本版的共同版主，从而可以更加方便的为大家服务，希望大家支持。 
35
Meta / Announcement: new moderator of Chinese subforum, cn-members
« on: November 10, 2014, 04:44:16 pm »
Just want everybody be informed, as a shared ID of the three representatives announced in
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10652.0
, "cn-members" now is the new moderator of Chinese subforum. Previous moderator "lib" has been removed from moderator position because he resigned long time ago.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10652.0
, "cn-members" now is the new moderator of Chinese subforum. Previous moderator "lib" has been removed from moderator position because he resigned long time ago.
36
General Discussion / A proposal regarding delegate payrate change&dilution, BM please consider
« on: November 01, 2014, 04:37:35 pm »
Obviously all BTS holders are very sensitive to dilution, even though the diluted BTS are used to pay developers and delegates.
On the other hand, we need fund to support developers by voting them as delegates. To maintain the balance between satisfaction of shareholders and requirement for developing, we need to minimize the dilution.
For the new proposal by BM about the delegate payrate change, he mentioned that the transaction fee and fees from issuing assets will be burned. Burning is in an opposite direction from dilution, then what's the meaning of burning while diluting? People are not grateful to burning but hate dilution.
My suggestion is that we keep the low income delegates as before, i.e. delegates get their pay still from transaction fee, asset issuing fee, etc.. Meanwhile, we have a few positions for high income delegates, who needs the approval by voting, and their income accounts for the dilution.
In the way, the dilution is minimized, then all share holders are satisfied, because they know how the newly issued bts are spent.
On the other hand, we need fund to support developers by voting them as delegates. To maintain the balance between satisfaction of shareholders and requirement for developing, we need to minimize the dilution.
For the new proposal by BM about the delegate payrate change, he mentioned that the transaction fee and fees from issuing assets will be burned. Burning is in an opposite direction from dilution, then what's the meaning of burning while diluting? People are not grateful to burning but hate dilution.
My suggestion is that we keep the low income delegates as before, i.e. delegates get their pay still from transaction fee, asset issuing fee, etc.. Meanwhile, we have a few positions for high income delegates, who needs the approval by voting, and their income accounts for the dilution.
In the way, the dilution is minimized, then all share holders are satisfied, because they know how the newly issued bts are spent.
37
Meta / suspicious ID is spamming fake info, please frezee or kill his ID
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:22:30 pm »
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=25620
It's a newly registered ID. So, if administrator can see his IP, I would like know which ID is related to it.
Thanks.
It's a newly registered ID. So, if administrator can see his IP, I would like know which ID is related to it.
Thanks.
38
General Discussion / New proposal: Blockchain based Apple OS, a better solution to resolve everything
« on: October 22, 2014, 03:50:59 am »
Translated from https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10235.0
If it's technically feasible, all new DACs can be based on the blockchain of BTSX, then bidUSD can be used among those DACs, just like XCP and MSC are BTC blockchain based. Then cross chain transaction can be realized.
Then a DAC can issue bitasset in btsx, whereas this bta is the basic currency of that DAC, like the current NXT asset.
All DACs are independent, so their wallets are independent, development team is independent, but blockchain are shared.
New DAC will honor ags, pts 10% and can still IPO, etc...
There is only one DPOS/delegates system, because all other DAC are based on BTSX blockchain, and transaction fee is btsx.
All IDs in different DACs are indentical, mailing system supports cross chain communication
PTS is still liquid, but as bitasset in BTSX
AGS is still inliquid.
The only disadvantage is a bigger blockchain, but can be resolved by light wallet or other technique, anyway BTS is going to do that.
The above is not my opinion, but translated as requested by a few users in Chinese board.
Any discussion is appreciated.
If it's technically feasible, all new DACs can be based on the blockchain of BTSX, then bidUSD can be used among those DACs, just like XCP and MSC are BTC blockchain based. Then cross chain transaction can be realized.
Then a DAC can issue bitasset in btsx, whereas this bta is the basic currency of that DAC, like the current NXT asset.
All DACs are independent, so their wallets are independent, development team is independent, but blockchain are shared.
New DAC will honor ags, pts 10% and can still IPO, etc...
There is only one DPOS/delegates system, because all other DAC are based on BTSX blockchain, and transaction fee is btsx.
All IDs in different DACs are indentical, mailing system supports cross chain communication
PTS is still liquid, but as bitasset in BTSX
AGS is still inliquid.
The only disadvantage is a bigger blockchain, but can be resolved by light wallet or other technique, anyway BTS is going to do that.
The above is not my opinion, but translated as requested by a few users in Chinese board.
Any discussion is appreciated.
39
中文 (Chinese) / 对BM提案作出的最佳解释：Gold 2.0 vs. Shares 2.0: Lets Talk Metaphors
« on: October 20, 2014, 08:40:31 pm »
我看了英文帖子很多文章，觉得对于增发BTSX，解释最合理的一个帖子，翻译过来，大家看看：
原帖地址:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10215.0
a)中本聪创建了比特币，想把它变为去中心化的数字黄金，黄金2.0
b）BM 创立了比特股，想把它变为去中心化自冶公司，股份2.0
如果你想成为一个类似比特币的去中心化的全球货币通缩（或者可控的通胀）是有道理的，但如果你尝试重新定义一个公司是什么，会怎样呢？
事实是：通常的中心化公司会一直发行新股份以促进自己的增长。而对一个DAC来说，要想跟传统公司竞争，它必须也有发行新股份的能力，否则，永远别想有竞争力，因为中心化的公司总会赢的，因为它有能力资助自己的增长。
在BM的最近提议中，持股人必须通过投票的方式达成大多数人共识，新股份才能被发行。 这是完全有道理的，如果我们想让DAC能够自筹资金与世界上真正公司竞争的话。 而如果我们作为一个社区，如果不支持这个增发股份的主意，那么整个DAC离死亡就不远了。
原帖地址:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10215.0
a)中本聪创建了比特币，想把它变为去中心化的数字黄金，黄金2.0
b）BM 创立了比特股，想把它变为去中心化自冶公司，股份2.0
如果你想成为一个类似比特币的去中心化的全球货币通缩（或者可控的通胀）是有道理的，但如果你尝试重新定义一个公司是什么，会怎样呢？
事实是：通常的中心化公司会一直发行新股份以促进自己的增长。而对一个DAC来说，要想跟传统公司竞争，它必须也有发行新股份的能力，否则，永远别想有竞争力，因为中心化的公司总会赢的，因为它有能力资助自己的增长。
在BM的最近提议中，持股人必须通过投票的方式达成大多数人共识，新股份才能被发行。 这是完全有道理的，如果我们想让DAC能够自筹资金与世界上真正公司竞争的话。 而如果我们作为一个社区，如果不支持这个增发股份的主意，那么整个DAC离死亡就不远了。
40
General Discussion / Main reason of FUD from Chinese Community
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:24:46 am »
As everyone may see, the price of btsx is high diving now. As the local moderator of Chinese subforum, first of all, I want to say that most of us are still supporting BM and 3I.
However, some of our friends are indeed selling their BTSX. Part of them choose to sell, because they turn to other investment which seems more profiting in short term. The other portion, from my understanding, is due to the cracking of their belief in BTSX. People liked BTSX, because it is a DAC and it has great potential. A DAC will always run by itself, even the dev teams abandons it, and a DAC doesn't change its consensus. However, what BM proposed in his previous a few posts are huge to its consensus. These change might be good in long term, but "inflating","diluting", those words sound very serious, and scare those guys. Anyway, they expect the change of BTSX is only about the function of wallet, not the consensus. I strongly suggest that next BM when BM announces something big which is non technical, he needs to rephrase every sentence and explain every points clearly. Actually, regarding this point, Stan can be a very good teacher, because Stan is very good at communication skills.
However, some of our friends are indeed selling their BTSX. Part of them choose to sell, because they turn to other investment which seems more profiting in short term. The other portion, from my understanding, is due to the cracking of their belief in BTSX. People liked BTSX, because it is a DAC and it has great potential. A DAC will always run by itself, even the dev teams abandons it, and a DAC doesn't change its consensus. However, what BM proposed in his previous a few posts are huge to its consensus. These change might be good in long term, but "inflating","diluting", those words sound very serious, and scare those guys. Anyway, they expect the change of BTSX is only about the function of wallet, not the consensus. I strongly suggest that next BM when BM announces something big which is non technical, he needs to rephrase every sentence and explain every points clearly. Actually, regarding this point, Stan can be a very good teacher, because Stan is very good at communication skills.
41
中文 (Chinese) / 新手注册帐号，免费送1BTSX，由antchina 蚂蚁基金和Overthetop提供帮助，长期有效！
« on: October 13, 2014, 07:12:37 pm »
虽然现在几个交易网站都提供长地址提现，但如果你是新手，且没有交易所的账户的话，可以在此留下地址，antchina 蚂蚁基金和Overthetop会及时发给你注册所需要的1BTSX。
42
KeyID / Who is maintaining keyid-faucet? you are causing others to miss blocks
« on: October 13, 2014, 03:09:29 am »Latency:-17.00s
Block # 98177
Block # 98034
Block # 97883
....
44
中文 (Chinese) / MOVED: 来来来，DNS受托人一句话拉票贴。wallet_account_set_approval 要投票的受托人id true
« on: October 03, 2014, 05:43:32 pm »45
General Discussion / Is BTSX inflating?
« on: October 01, 2014, 04:31:44 am »
"blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,980,098.06896 BTSX",
If I remember correctly, a few days ago, this number was much smaller, and it should be reducing, because many delegates are burning their income. For example, my delegate is burning 50%. However, the share supply suddenly increased. Did I miss something or the consensus was changed?
BTW, I like the previous "OVERVIEW" page of wallet, because users can see the daily burning, daily expense, etc..
If I remember correctly, a few days ago, this number was much smaller, and it should be reducing, because many delegates are burning their income. For example, my delegate is burning 50%. However, the share supply suddenly increased. Did I miss something or the consensus was changed?
BTW, I like the previous "OVERVIEW" page of wallet, because users can see the daily burning, daily expense, etc..
