Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ripplexiaoshan

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 151
1
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于建立社区多签投票账户的提议
« on: August 14, 2019, 03:40:06 am »
经过cn vote第一次选举,进入投票多签名单的是 教授 小宁大大 道枝 舞天非月 三胖 finn PTS中国

2
中文(Chinese) / Re: CTS 去掉全局黑天鹅测试
« on: August 12, 2019, 10:50:23 am »
提前警告一下哈。最近收到不少反馈,说CTS边黑BTS边拉人。正常的规则探讨和技术讨论没问题,但是如果涉及利益冲突,我将依照版规,做删帖处理哈,毕竟这是BTS论坛。

3
Greetings Alex, is this still on track? I just submitted a draft of a research paper for the academic track. If it's accepted by the conference, I'll plan to try to travel over there to give a talk on the research as long as my research worker proposal has been funded sufficiently by then to support a long-term project.

If it happens that I don't have sufficient levels of project funding by then but my paper is accepted anyway, will your worker be able to reimburse my travel to Greece for this? If so, the final published version of the paper would still reference BitShares as the source of funds for the work, if that's any concern to you.

Yes still on track.

I'm sure that wont be a problem...So get packing :)

Excellent, the paper is submitted and available for community review here.
I like your paper!

4
Can you post a summary of this worker in here as well please? If possible with links and references of media and social media coverage
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15

I am confused by the way you have setup the table there. You mention incoming and outgoing payments, and I can't identify where this workers own budget comes in. My questions:
  • How much funds have been collected through this worker?
  • Where are those funds shown in the table of https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15?
  • Is there anything left over that will be returned?
  • Can you please clarify what "market fee for huodongxing" and "safeguard service" is?

Please summarize and finalize this worker before tapping into funds of another worker.

I think you misunderstood something. The table in your link was for 1st Devcon, which was not covered by a worker. The accounting for 2nd Devcon, which is covered by this worker, will be reported for sure, just give them some time to relax. They need some time to summarize income/outcome, follow up all media, pay bills, etc.. I assume they will finish everything within a month after Devcon.

5
中文(Chinese) / Re: worker 可能是压垮价格的最后一根稻草
« on: August 02, 2019, 06:49:43 am »
在没有worker也没人干活,以及有worker干活但大家BTS被稀释,二者之间选一,你选哪个?

6
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于worker
« on: August 02, 2019, 06:48:49 am »
worker报告都有的,而且很详细,只是你没仔细去找。比如core team的Ui的这些都在foundation网站。
问题不在这。问题在于缺乏竞争,导致很多worker拿钱太舒服,价格高,效率低。

7
Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?

A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?

Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.

up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.

jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.

so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.

Wait, wait... Witness Still haven't provide transparency for worker accounting and told you in polite way to fuck off and use leftover on unmanaged worker funds ?

Im sorry if im too direct, no bad meaning towards yourself or Jademont.

The time flow is like this:
Before the worker was ended in 2018, witness.still confirmed to cover the expense of bitcrab for 1st Devcon by this worker.
Then witness.still has never provided transparency for this worker in this post since that.
bitcrab and me contacted him and asked him to provide transparency and reporting of this worker to end this worker, so bitcrab can get him money back.
Request was ignored.

8
Quote
jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.
I confirm this. The guy who is controlling account "still" has left BTS community and rejected to spend more time on the reporting of this worker. I appreciate his contribution on this worker but it is very unprofessional to ignore the report.


Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?

A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?

Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.

up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.

jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.

so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.

9
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts on new OMO fund
« on: July 26, 2019, 04:44:44 pm »
I support this proposal. BTS price is in a very safe region.

10
Congratulations to your new project!

11
I have looked into the introduction of this meeting, it seems pretty good, therefore I would like to see the presence of BitShares on this conference.

As for the budget, it's up to voters. Maybe you can create three proposals, and see which one get the highest votes in the end.

We need more activities and media exposures for BitShares.

12
Support, I have been waiting market fee sharing for a long time.

The remaining 20% goes to this proposal?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28508.0

13
中文(Chinese) / Re: BTS投资指南
« on: June 15, 2019, 05:26:56 am »
讨论这么热闹,我也发表下观点:
1、bitCNY作为BTS系统稳定币,增加其发行量不应该是首要目的。 发行量要跟需求匹配,“够市场用”即可。历史已经证明,发行再多的bitCNY,如果都用来加杠杆买入更多BTS,那么跌下来的时候发行量降低的速度比之前增加的还快,而这个过程对BTS系统的伤害很难修复。

2、“够市场用”的意思是各种应用对BTS的需求,比如百城百店商户的储备金,比如法币进出承兑商的储备金等等,绝不是赌徒们贴现抵押对bitCNY的需求。

3、目前很多调整都是侧重纯金融方面的奇技淫巧,而对BTS的基本面没有什么促进作用,这也就是BTS表现不佳的原因,因为无法传递给外部资金。相比而言,我对于即将上线的资产推广市场费分成,HTLC跨链交易,barter 交易等等比较看好。bitCNY永远是个为BTS服务的附属物,不应该是BTS的主角。把内盘体验做到足够好,把市场推广做好,用BTS来赚钱的人足够多,bitCNY供应量还会这么低?

14
I do not support this proposal.

comparing to the daily BTS release via worker proposal budget, the market fee accumulation is so few that can be ignored and will not generate obvious effect.

I prefer to set smartcoins 100% market fee sharing, I believe this will greatly encourage users to become lifetime member and invite more users to come to BTS ecosystem.

this is a much better way to use the smartcoin market fee than "buy back BTS and burn".

Agree on that
Sounds like a good suggestion. It can be done at the same time. The two plans do not conflict.

Agree, we can do both at the same time.

15
中文(Chinese) / Re: BTS回购销毁提案
« on: June 15, 2019, 04:40:27 am »
虽然我认为实际意义并不大,但也没有坏处,并且因为回购销毁是工会的第一个提案,我表示支持。

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 151