Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ripplexiaoshan

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 151
1
中文(Chinese) / Re: 比特股的未来,交易所还是稳定币?
« on: November 02, 2019, 05:29:55 pm »
从最近的交易大赛数据看,走交易的路子是对的。慢慢的会有人发现内盘深度还可以,就会充值来交易,同时网关能赚到钱,就会更有动力开发更好的客户端给用户,那么外部用户也会越来越多,形成正循环。

2
中文(Chinese) / Re: FOX是败类,对BTS持有者的利益伤害。
« on: October 31, 2019, 02:58:48 pm »
警告一次,论坛不得人身攻击

3
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于建立社区多签投票账户的提议
« on: October 11, 2019, 05:37:58 am »
这其中的人员建议就不要放理事会成员,高代理人员了,他们已经足够可以通过自己的账号表达意见了。留在cn-vote里面无法代表广大散户,反而有控制大家辛苦组建的账号嫌疑,影响cn-vote的决策,该帐号的公正性难以保证。


owner账户,active账户都已经移除观察员,完全由社区成员构成

4
Yes, I have reminded Jademont to edit the API node url to the new one ( wss://api.1hour.win/ws ). :)
Interesting. Jademont again? If I'm correct Jademont is behind quite a few witnesses. Ideally witnesses should be somewhat independent. The worst scenario is a hostile takeover, I wish it's not our case.
I take it as compliment.

As a long term BTS holder since day 1, I have helped many person including some witnesses thus have connection with some of them, that's why it seems "I am behind a few witnesses". However, none of the current active witnesses belongs to me. To avoid conflict of interest, ety001 is the only maintainer of server, and he is responsible for price feeding, block producing, etc..

BTW, I do think for some active witness, whose owner has been inactive in community for long time, should not have support anymore. Producing blocks is the basic job for witnesses, but witnesses need to do more, especially when worker budget is cut. I have seen a lot good examples in other projects, for example, EOS, GXC, COCOS, etc.. We should learn from them.


5
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于建立社区多签投票账户的提议
« on: August 14, 2019, 03:40:06 am »
经过cn vote第一次选举,进入投票多签名单的是 教授 小宁大大 道枝 舞天非月 三胖 finn PTS中国

6
中文(Chinese) / Re: CTS 去掉全局黑天鹅测试
« on: August 12, 2019, 10:50:23 am »
提前警告一下哈。最近收到不少反馈,说CTS边黑BTS边拉人。正常的规则探讨和技术讨论没问题,但是如果涉及利益冲突,我将依照版规,做删帖处理哈,毕竟这是BTS论坛。

7
Greetings Alex, is this still on track? I just submitted a draft of a research paper for the academic track. If it's accepted by the conference, I'll plan to try to travel over there to give a talk on the research as long as my research worker proposal has been funded sufficiently by then to support a long-term project.

If it happens that I don't have sufficient levels of project funding by then but my paper is accepted anyway, will your worker be able to reimburse my travel to Greece for this? If so, the final published version of the paper would still reference BitShares as the source of funds for the work, if that's any concern to you.

Yes still on track.

I'm sure that wont be a problem...So get packing :)

Excellent, the paper is submitted and available for community review here.
I like your paper!

8
Can you post a summary of this worker in here as well please? If possible with links and references of media and social media coverage
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15

I am confused by the way you have setup the table there. You mention incoming and outgoing payments, and I can't identify where this workers own budget comes in. My questions:
  • How much funds have been collected through this worker?
  • Where are those funds shown in the table of https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=25196.15?
  • Is there anything left over that will be returned?
  • Can you please clarify what "market fee for huodongxing" and "safeguard service" is?

Please summarize and finalize this worker before tapping into funds of another worker.

I think you misunderstood something. The table in your link was for 1st Devcon, which was not covered by a worker. The accounting for 2nd Devcon, which is covered by this worker, will be reported for sure, just give them some time to relax. They need some time to summarize income/outcome, follow up all media, pay bills, etc.. I assume they will finish everything within a month after Devcon.

9
中文(Chinese) / Re: worker 可能是压垮价格的最后一根稻草
« on: August 02, 2019, 06:49:43 am »
在没有worker也没人干活,以及有worker干活但大家BTS被稀释,二者之间选一,你选哪个?

10
中文(Chinese) / Re: 关于worker
« on: August 02, 2019, 06:48:49 am »
worker报告都有的,而且很详细,只是你没仔细去找。比如core team的Ui的这些都在foundation网站。
问题不在这。问题在于缺乏竞争,导致很多worker拿钱太舒服,价格高,效率低。

11
Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?

A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?

Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.

up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.

jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.

so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.

Wait, wait... Witness Still haven't provide transparency for worker accounting and told you in polite way to fuck off and use leftover on unmanaged worker funds ?

Im sorry if im too direct, no bad meaning towards yourself or Jademont.

The time flow is like this:
Before the worker was ended in 2018, witness.still confirmed to cover the expense of bitcrab for 1st Devcon by this worker.
Then witness.still has never provided transparency for this worker in this post since that.
bitcrab and me contacted him and asked him to provide transparency and reporting of this worker to end this worker, so bitcrab can get him money back.
Request was ignored.

12
Quote
jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.
I confirm this. The guy who is controlling account "still" has left BTS community and rejected to spend more time on the reporting of this worker. I appreciate his contribution on this worker but it is very unprofessional to ignore the report.


Okay. To have a precise statement. Do you mean A) or B) from below?

A) The BitShares account "still" pays the expenses? Background: On the blockchain, BTS with an equivalent value (at the time of transfers) of 130k bitUSD have been paid out already to "still".
B) The BitShares account "worker63fundholder" pays the expenses?

Furthermore, is there a budget overview of this worker somewhere? It has specifically asked for an equivalent value of 90k bitUSD, so the time when payments in BTS happen is very crucial. Sorry for the annoyance. How much equivalent value in bitUSD was already used from this worker in your opinion? Might be that this issue reduces to plain accounting, I simply don't understand it atm.

up to now the 147k CNY for 1st Devcon was paid by myself personally, without getting any fund from still or this worker.

jademont and I have talked about this with still several months ago, he rejected to provide more detail of the worker expense and just told us to get needed fund from what was left from the worker.

so one choice is to pay this 147k CNY to me from the left fund of the worker, as the expense detail is clear and is in plan of BTS Greater China Representative, and at the same time we will continue to request still to provide more clarification of the other expenses. although we are not 100% sure we can get this done.

13
General Discussion / Re: Thoughts on new OMO fund
« on: July 26, 2019, 04:44:44 pm »
I support this proposal. BTS price is in a very safe region.

14
Congratulations to your new project!

15
I have looked into the introduction of this meeting, it seems pretty good, therefore I would like to see the presence of BitShares on this conference.

As for the budget, it's up to voters. Maybe you can create three proposals, and see which one get the highest votes in the end.

We need more activities and media exposures for BitShares.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 151