226
General Discussion / Newsletter?
« on: December 13, 2015, 02:21:08 pm »
Are there any plans to bring the monthly Newsletter back?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The conclusion so far looks to me like this:I don't see a majority in your poll that says the fees are too high?!
low fees -> trading bots -> liquidity -> most of us are satisfied
So lowering the trading fees is the key here.
But Ronny, aren't you offering rewards to people for placing bids and asks on CCEDK? Why incentivize people to provide liquidity on CCEDK rather than OpenLedger? OpenLedger is ALREADY suffering from fragmented liquidity with each gateway having separately traded UIAs representing the coins they make available for deposit into OL. None of this makes sense. As I mentioned in a previous post (and as it seems phillyguy is also saying), if I were you I would eliminate the centralized markets on CCEDK for which there are corresponding markets on OL. Take BTS:BTC for example. You can still have that order book on CCEDK, but just have it reflect the OL order book for that market. Obviously you can't make this happen at this snap of your finger. But it shouldn't be too difficult, and hopefully it's your plan in the near future.
But regardless of that, and probably more importantly, there needs to be ONE token that all of the OL partner gateways use for each asset they are making available for deposit into (and for withdrawal out of) the wallet. That should be the BitAsset version. Why are you guys not doing it that way? I can't figure it out. But I know it's killing the promise of an OPEN ledger i.e. shared order books i.e. pooled liquidity. Do you see what I'm saying. This is not good.
Any suggestions from this incredibly smart community is welcome of course.Actually I'm not from the smarter part of this community but if you would ask me...