Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - btswolf

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22
226
General Discussion / Newsletter?
« on: December 13, 2015, 02:21:08 pm »
Are there any plans to bring the monthly Newsletter back?

227
General Discussion / Re: BTSwolf.com General Thread
« on: December 13, 2015, 04:04:48 am »
thx roadscape

What about this one?

228
General Discussion / Re: BTSwolf.com General Thread
« on: December 13, 2015, 12:05:51 am »
I'd like to know if this diagram is put together correctly or if something is wrong or missing.
Topic: BitShares "Positions" based on http://docs.bitshares.eu/bitshares/user/index.html#blockchain-positions

229
General Discussion / BTSwolf.com General Thread
« on: December 13, 2015, 12:02:34 am »
This thread is all about BTSwolf.com.

230
Meta / Re: [POLL] Tipbot Yes/No
« on: December 12, 2015, 11:29:52 am »
I think it is good to try new features like the Tipbot on the forum but I it has to be regulated.
Recently some users are spamming the forum with useless UIA`s just for fun and yes that is very distracting when reading through the forum.
And no I can't ignore it because usually I'm not logged in when just reading here.

IMHO the Tipbot should be:
*limited to only one or a very well selected handful of UIA`s
*should not post himself
*it should not be used in a negative manner
*if not regulated it should be ceased

If people are reading our forum they should recognize that we are able to reward valuable content.
But they should not get the impression this forum is full of bored guys who have nothing better to do than playing ping pong with the Tipbot.

Thank you Fav and all other mods for taking care of this forum and helping to keep it clean.

231

The conclusion so far looks to me like this:
low fees -> trading bots -> liquidity -> most of us are satisfied
So lowering the trading fees is the key here.
I don't see a majority in your poll that says the fees are too high?!


If you want me to trade on the DEX I need the following things, sorted by priority:
  • Privacy (Stealth Accounts/Transfers per default)
  • Keep it sweet and simple (self-explanatory and at least midrange class UI)
  • Liquidity
  • FIAT Gateway
  • Make me feel I'm a Customer 'customer is king' (Support)
I have not yet claimed my main BTS1.0 stake cause of privacy concerns and the poor UI experience so far.
I also bought some BTS via Poloniex but I'm not gonna withdraw them until the reasons above are fixed.
- Well if Polo gets Goxed I'll lose some of my stake but I'm lazy and at the moment I trust Polo more than my own security measures to protect my OpenLedger wallet.
I don't trade often but if I do - I don't care much about fees as long as they are not impertinently high.
- I think if someone wants lower fees than the standard fees s/he should be able to buy a Flatrate or Premium package, like the annual or lifetime subscription.

So far I think BitShares 2.0 does not offer much more incentives to use it than 0.9 did.
BUT the foundation and ecosystem seems solid, fast and scalable enough for future improvements, that's why I'm still buying and holding till I'm dead or rich.

232
OpenLedger / Re: CCEDK now 10% of all BTS trade volume
« on: November 01, 2015, 12:37:22 pm »
But Ronny, aren't you offering rewards to people for placing bids and asks on CCEDK?  Why incentivize people to provide liquidity on CCEDK rather than OpenLedger?  OpenLedger is ALREADY suffering from fragmented liquidity with each gateway having separately traded UIAs representing the coins they make available for deposit into OL.  None of this makes sense.  As I mentioned in a previous post (and as it seems phillyguy is also saying), if I were you I would eliminate the centralized markets on CCEDK for which there are corresponding markets on OL.  Take BTS:BTC for example.  You can still have that order book on CCEDK, but just have it reflect the OL order book for that market.  Obviously you can't make this happen at this snap of your finger.  But it shouldn't be too difficult, and hopefully it's your plan in the near future. 

But regardless of that, and probably more importantly, there needs to be ONE token that all of the OL partner gateways use for each asset they are making available for deposit into (and for withdrawal out of) the wallet.  That should be the BitAsset version.  Why are you guys not doing it that way?  I can't figure it out.  But I know it's killing the promise of an OPEN ledger i.e. shared order books i.e. pooled liquidity.  Do you see what I'm saying.  This is not good.
+5% +5% +5%

233
Technical Support / Re: Confusion with Download links.
« on: October 30, 2015, 11:52:42 pm »
Not tech savvy? No problem
Go https://bitshares.org/wallet or https://bitshares.openledger.info ...
Anytime, any Device, everywhere

Just take care of your Wallet backup and password.

Edit: Welcome.

234
OpenLedger / Re: USD, EUR and CNY Gateway created on CCEDK.com
« on: October 27, 2015, 11:55:58 pm »
I'm not a daytrader so I'm not able to participate in Exchange actions to bring more volume.
But I'm willing to support the ecosystem by redirecting a part of my monthly FIAT savings into Pegged Assets like BitUSD/BitEUR etc.

Example process:
I send every month FIAT to CCEDK Account. (manually)
Exchange automatically converts my FIAT to BitEUR with a max predefined spread e.g. 1%.
BitEUR is automatically send to my own cryptosavings account.

If this process is highly automated you definitly got me and finally I can support the ecosys with just a classic FIAT transaction.

235
Technical Support / What is PlasmaOS?
« on: October 25, 2015, 12:42:14 pm »
What are the plans for PlasmaOS?
Will it be some kind of a atomic cross-chain protocol?
Is it going to be a upgrade for GrapheneOS or a new product independent from Graphene and BitShares?

236
Deutsch (German) / Re: BTSwolf ist online
« on: September 29, 2015, 09:21:47 pm »
Kurzes Lebenszeichen von mir, aber nicht direkt in eigener Sache.
Unterstützt doch bitte Bitcoinblog.de in dem ihr eure Stimme hier abgebt: http://finanzblog-award.de/community
EDIT: Oh seh grad der http://Coinspondent.de steht auch zur Auswahl. Wie auch immer, eure Stimme zählt.
Eine gute Platzierung hilft dem gesamten Cryptospace.

Persönlich bin ich grad etwas Land unter, Job, Abendschule etc.
Aber neue Blogbeiträge und eine Aktualisierung von btswolf.de ist nach dem BTS 2.0 Release geplant.

Gruß
T

237
Deutsch (German) / Re: Vortragsankündigung
« on: August 19, 2015, 05:52:23 pm »
@btswolf ?
Da "muss" ich auf die Wies'n. 8)

238
just burn it!

239
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Questions about Notes
« on: July 17, 2015, 05:49:02 pm »
Any suggestions from this incredibly smart community is welcome of course.
Actually I'm not from the smarter part of this community but if you would ask me...
I'd like to see MUSE launched as a separate Wallet/Website on the Graphene based BitShares Blockchain.
"Combine the extremes, and you will have the true center."

240
Very happy to see this happen.  +5%

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22